Chemical Influence of Pore Pressure on Brine Flow in Clay-Rich Material

  • Etienne CassiniEmail author
  • Danila Mylnikov
  • Roman Makhnenko
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Series in Geomechanics and Geoengineering book series (SSGG)


Hydromechanical properties of shales are complex due to the involved material structure, with the solid matrix being mainly formed by swelling clays and porosity dominated by nanometer scale tortuous voids with large aspect ratios. Intrinsic permeability of restructured Opalinus Clay (Swiss shale) brought to shallow geological storage conditions was measured with in situ brine. Under constant temperature, vertical stress, and downstream fluid pressure, steady-state flow experiments show a significant trend of permeability decrease with increasing differential (upstream minus downstream) fluid pressure, thus contradicting the conventional Darcy’s description. To interpret these experimental measurements, brine permeability is derived using a one-step self-consistent homogenization scheme based on the knowledge of material’s pore structure. While mechanical and thermal effects cannot explain the permeability decrease, the trend is reproduced with the correct order of magnitude by considering a chemical effect: a pore size reduction in the sample due to water adsorption at mineral surface.


Intrinsic Permeability Intact Material Klinkenberg Effect Accessible Porosity Pore Size Reduction 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



Opalinus clay cores were provided by Swisstopo in the framework of Mont Terri project, CS-C experiment. R. Makhnenko acknowledges the support from SCCER-SoE (Switzerland) grant KTI.2013.288 and Swiss Federal Office of Energy (SFOE) project CAPROCK #810008154.


  1. ASTM D4767 (2011) Standard Test Method for Consolidated Undrained Triaxial Compression Test for Cohesive SoilsGoogle Scholar
  2. Bossart P (2012) Characteristics of the Opalinus Clay at Mont Terri.
  3. Botan A, Rotenberg B, Marry V, Turq P, Noetinger B (2011) Hydrodynamics in clay nanopores. J Phys Chem C 115(32):16109–16115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cariou S (2010) Couplage hydro-mécanique et transfert dans l’argilite de Meuse/Haute-Marne: approches expérimentale et multi-échelle (Doctoral dissertation, Ecole des Ponts ParisTech)Google Scholar
  5. Dormieux L, Kondo D, Ulm FJ (2006) Microporomechanics. Wiley, Chichester 327 pCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Romero E, Senger R, Marschall P, Gomez R (2013) Air tests on low-permeability claystone formations. Experimental results and simulations. In: Laloui L, Ferrari A (eds) Multiphysical Testing of Soils and Shales., Springer Series in Geomechanics and Geoengineering, Springer, Heidelberg, pp 69–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Giraud A, Sevostianov I, Chen F, Grgic D (2015) Effective thermal conductivity of oolitic rocks using the Maxwell homogenization method. Int J Rock Mech Mining Sci 80:379–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Makhnenko RY, Labuz JF (2016) Elastic and inelastic deformation of fluid-saturated rock. Phil Trans R Soc A 374:20150422. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2015.0422 MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Pearson FJ (2002) PC experiment: recipe for artificial pore water. Mont Terri Project, Technical Note 2002–17Google Scholar
  10. Toth J (1971) State equations of the solid-gas interface layers. Acta Chim Acad Sci Hungar 69(3):311–328Google Scholar
  11. Weaver CE (1988) Clays, Muds, and Shales. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 819 pGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Etienne Cassini
    • 1
    Email author
  • Danila Mylnikov
    • 1
  • Roman Makhnenko
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Laboratory of Soil Mechanics – Chair “Gaz Naturel” PetrosvibriSwiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL)LausanneSwitzerland
  2. 2.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignUrbanaUSA

Personalised recommendations