Abstract
For typical shales (void ratio 0.15 to 0.42), modal pore throat sizes range from a few nm to a few tens of nm. Unstressed shales, even when fully saturated, have negative pore water pressure (capillary tension). However, the total suction is often greater than this, especially for highly-compacted shales with extremely small pore size. The additional suction is due to effects associated with clay surfaces. Osmotic pressures can be directly measured, and they can easily be several MPa, a combination of solute suction and clay-related effects. The small pore sizes in shales also result in extremely low values of permeability and of consolidation coefficient. All these characteristics directly impact testing protocols. The first step in any test should be to apply sufficient confining stress to raise the pore pressure up to a positive, measured value. Undrained consolidation, combined with undrained triaxial compression and with small sample sizes (and drainage screens when necessary), results in acceptable test durations. A range of effective consolidation stress values is attained by first equilibrating shale samples in varying amounts of suction, to vary the water content. Non-aqueous fluids are required when sampling, to avoid swelling, and are often necessary for pore lines if osmotic pressures are to be avoided.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Ewy RT, Stankovich RJ (2000) Pore pressure change due to shale-fluid interactions: Measurements under simulated wellbore conditions. In: Pacific Rocks 2000, 4th North American rock mechanical symposium, Seattle, USA, 31 July–3 August. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 147–154
Ewy RT, Stankovic RJ (2010) Shale swelling, osmosis, and acoustic changes measured under simulated downhole conditions. SPE Drilling & Completion, SPE 78160, pp 177–186, June
Ewy RT (2014) Shale swelling/shrinkage and water content change due to imposed suction and due to direct brine contact. Acta Geotech 9:869–886
Ewy RT (2015) Shale/claystone response to air and liquid exposure, and implications for handling, sampling and testing. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 80:388–401
Head KH (1998) Manual of soil laboratory testing: Effective stress tests, vol 3. Wiley, Chichester
Steiger RP, Leung PK (1991) Consolidated undrained triaxial test procedure for shales. In: Proceedings of 32nd U.S. rock mechanical symposium, Norman, OK, USA, pp 637–646. Balkema, Rotterdam
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ewy, R.T. (2017). Shale Capillarity, Osmotic Suction and Permeability, and Solutions to Practical Testing Issues. In: Ferrari, A., Laloui, L. (eds) Advances in Laboratory Testing and Modelling of Soils and Shales (ATMSS). ATMSS 2017. Springer Series in Geomechanics and Geoengineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52773-4_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52773-4_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-52772-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-52773-4
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)