Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Using Model-Based Learning to Promote Computational Thinking Education

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Emerging Research, Practice, and Policy on Computational Thinking

Abstract

Digital technology in the twenty-first century is characterized by omnipresent smart devices and ubiquitous computing that enable computation to occur almost anytime and anywhere. This contributes to increased complexity, rapidly changing technologies, and big data challenges to professionals in most every disciplinary field. In this environment, computational thinking (CT) becomes a fundamental skill to empower our next generation of the American workforce. Consequently, CT education across all disciplines and grade levels is being advocated by academic institutions, governmental agencies, and private industrial corporations. However, existing academic programs in K-12 schools and small teaching universities are inadequately structured to prepare students with the needed computational thinking skills and knowledge. In addition, there is a scarcity in research on learning CT to guide development of CT curriculum and instructional practices across all grade levels. To mitigate this problem, we propose several model-based learning programs that the authors have been exploring since 2012 to promote active learning of CT for students of different age groups. Most of the programs were designed to exploit out-of-school time education and hands-on team research projects to advance CT education from K6 to K16 students. Under the CT context, the proposed and existing programs emphasize cultivating student problem solving ability through problem-based learning (PBL) in which students learn computational thinking by completing team projects. We also illustrate how small universities and K-12 schools can cost-effectively offer CT education by forming coalitions, leveraging emerging cyberlearning technology, and sharing educational resources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • ACE. (2016). Instructional Software and Materials. Retrieved from: http://www.data-harvest.co.uk/catalogue/technology/primary/software/primary-software.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alfieri, L., Higashi, R., Shoop, R., & Schunn, C. D. (2015). Case Study of a robot-based game to shape interests and home proportional reasoning skills. International Journal of STEM Education, 2(4). doi:10.1186/s40594-015-0017-9.

  • Andrew, V. (1998). The purpose of mathematical models is insight, not numbers. Decision Line, 29(1), 20–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barr, V., & Stephenson, C. (2011). Bringing computational thinking to K-12: what is involved and what is the role of the computer science education community? ACM Inroads, 2(1), 48–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benitti, F. B. V. (2012). Exploring the educational potential of robotics in schools: a systematic review. Computers & Education, 58(3), 978–988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blikstein, P., & Wilensky, U. (2007). Bifocal modeling: a framework for combining computer modeling, robotics and real-world sensing. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA 2007), Chicago, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blikstein, P., Fuhrmann, T., Greene, D., & Salehi, S. (2012). Bifocal modeling: mixing real and virtual labs for advanced science learning. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC ‘12) (pp. 296–299). ACM: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgman, C. L., Abelson, H., Drinks, L., Johnson, R., Koedinger, K. R., Linn, M. C., & Szalay, A. (2008). Fostering Learning in the Networked World: The Cyberlearning Opportunity and Challenge. Retrieved from: http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2008/nsf08204/nsf08204.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryan, K., & Leise, T. (2006). The $25,000,000,000 eigenvector: the linear algebra behind google. SIAM Review, 48(3), 569–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carnegie Foundation. (2016). Using improvement science to accelerate learning and address problems of practice. Downloaded 04/14/2016 from http://www.carnegiefoundation.org/our-ideas/.

  • Carnegie Mellon Robotics Academy. (2016). http://education.rec.ri.cmu.edu/roboticscurriculum/.

  • Chai, J., Friedler, L. M., Wolff, E. F., Li, J., & Rhea, K. (2014). A cross-national study of calculus. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 46(4), 481–494. doi:10.1080/0020739X.2014.990531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuny, J., Snyder, L., & Wing, J.M. (2010). Demystifying Computational Thinking for Noncomputer Scientists. Unpublished manuscript in progress. Retrieved from: http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~CompThink/resources/TheLinkWing.pdf

  • Eseryel, D., & Law, V. (2012). Effect of cognitive regulation in understanding complex science systems during simulation-based inquiry learning. Technology, Instruction, Cognition and Learning, 9, 111–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finegold, D., & Notabartolo, A. S. (2011). 21st Competencies and Impact. Retrieved from http://www.hewlett.org/uploads/21st_Century_Competencies_Impact.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuhrmann, T., Salehi, S., & Blikstein, P. (2013). Meta-modeling knowledge: Comparing model construction and model interaction in bifocal modeling. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC ’13) (pp. 483–486). New York: ACM. doi: 10.1145/2485760.2485810

    Google Scholar 

  • GUTS. (2016). Computer Science in Science. Retrieved from: http://www.projectguts.org/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental Models: Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference, and Consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joint Mathematical Meetings. (2015). Transforming Post-Secondary Education in Mathematics., San Antonio, TX.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: an analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41, 75–86. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lesh, R., Post, T., & Behr, M. (1988). Proportional reasoning. In J. Hiebert & M. Behr (Eds.), Number Concepts and Operations in the Middle Grades (pp. 93–118). National Council of Teachers of Mathematics: Reston, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, L., & Ludu, A. (2012). ACE – a model centered reu program standing on the three legs of cse: analysis, computation and experiment. In H. Ali, Y. Shi, D. Khazanchi, M. Lee, G. D. van Albada, J. Dongarra, et al. (Eds.), Proceeding of the ICCS 2012, Omaha, NE. Procedia Computer Science (Vol. 9, pp. 1773–1782).

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, H., & Klein, J. (2013). Using REU project and crowdsourcing to facilitate learning on demand. In Proceedings of the IADIS International Conference on Cognition and Explorative Learning at Digit Ages (pp. 251–258). Fort Worth, TX: International Assn for Development of the Information Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, H., Ludu, M., & Holton, D. (2015a). Can K-12 math teachers train students to make sound logic reasoning? – A question affecting 21st century skills. In X. Ge, M. Spector, & D. Ifenthaler (Eds.), Emerging Technologies for STEAM Education (pp. 331–353). Switzerland: Springers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, H., & Raghavan, J. (2009). A mathematical modeling module with system engineering approach for teaching undergraduate students to conquer complexity. In The Proceedings of the Conference ICCS 09, Baton Rouge, LA, USA, Part II, LNCS5545 (pp. 93–102).

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, H., Shi, X., Shao, J., Zhou, Q., Joseph-Ellison, S., Jaworski, J., & Wen, C. (2015b). The mechatronic system of eco-dolphin – a fleet of autonomous underwater vehicles. In Proceeding of the International Conference of Advanced Mechatronics System 2015 (pp. 108–113). Beijing, China: IEEE. doi:10.1109/ICAMechS.2015.7287138.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McGivney-Burelle, J., & Xue, F. (2015). Flipping Calculus. PRIMUS, Problems, Resources, and Issues in Mathematics Undergraduate Studies, 23(5), 477–486. doi:10.1080/10511970.2012.757571.

    Google Scholar 

  • ModelSim Project. (2016). Enabling Modeling and Simulation-Based Science in the Classroom. Retrieved from: http://modelsim.tech.northwestern.edu/info/

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2010). Report of a Workshop on the Scope and Nature of Computational Thinking. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi:10.17226/12840.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (NRC). (2011). Report of a Workshop of Pedagogical Aspects of Computational Thinking. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=13170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirnay-Dummer, P., Ifenthaler, D., & Spector, J. M. (2010). Highly integrated model assessment technology and tools. Educational Technology Research & Development, 58(1), 3–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, S., & Kuhn, D. (2012). Developing multivariable. Cognitive Development, 35, 92–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, E. F. (1968). Short Biograph of Richard W. Hamming, For His Work on Numerical Methods, Automatic Coding Systems, and Error-detecting and Error-correcting Codes. Retrieved from: http://amturing.acm.org/award_winners/hamming_1000652.cfm

  • Sabelli, N. (2008). Applying What We Know to Improve Teaching and Learning, the Carnegie/IAS Commission on Math Science Education. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeld, A. H. S. (1995). A brief biography of calculus reform. UME Trends: News and Reports on Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 6(6), 3–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seel, N. M., & Blumschein, P. (2009). Modeling and Simulation in Learning and Instruction: A Theoretical Perspective, “Model-based Approaches to Learning: Using Systems Models and Simulations to Improve Understanding and Problem Solving in Complex Domains”. In P. Blumschein, W. Hung, D. Jonassen, & J. Strobel (Eds.), Modeling and Simulations for Learning and Instruction, 4. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics. (2015). Modeling across the curriculum II. Philadelphia, PA: 2nd SIAM-NSF Workshop. Retrieved from: https://www.siam.org/reports/ModelingAcross%20Curr_2014.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spector, M. (2009). Foreword, “Model-based approaches to learning: using systems models and simulations to improve understanding and problem solving in complex domains”. In P. Blumschein, W. Hung, D. Jonassen, & J. Strobel (Eds.), Modeling and Simulations for Learning and Instruction, 4. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, P., & Petzold, L. (2011). Undergraduate computational science and engineering education. SIAM Review, 53(3), 561–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, P., Levy, R., & Fowler, K. (2015). Collaboration in the Mathematical Sciences Community on Mathematical Modeling Across the Curriculum, Chance, Using Data to Advance Science, Education, and Society. Retrieved from: http://chance.amstat.org/2015/11/math-modeling.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vollstedt, A. M., Robinson, M., & Wang, E. (2007). Using robotics to enhance science, technology, engineering, and mathematics curricula. In Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Pacific Southwest Annual Conference, Honolulu, HI

    Google Scholar 

  • Wing, J. M. (2006). A vision for the 21st century: computational thinking. Communication of ACM, 49(3), 33–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zorn, P., Bailer, J., Braddy, L., Carpenter, J., Jaco, W., & Turner, P. (2014). The INGenIOuS project-mathematics, statistics, and preparing the 21st century workforce. Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America. Paper presented at the 7th World Conference on Educational Sciences, (WCES-2015), 05–07 February 2015, Novotel Athens Convention Center, Athens, Greece.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The cyberlearning project for CSE and summer REU workshops described in section “Coalition for Undergraduate CSE Education” was sponsored by the NSF TUES grant (1244967), and the Eco-Dolphin project described in “Eco-Dolphin Project” was partially sponsored by the Air Force Research Lab under award FA8750-15-1-0143.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Daytona Beach, FL, 32114, USA

    Hong P. Liu & Sirani M. Perera

  2. Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, 13244, USA

    Jerry W. Klein

Authors
  1. Hong P. Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sirani M. Perera
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jerry W. Klein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hong P. Liu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. 150K MCKB, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USA

    Peter J. Rich

  2. Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, Georgia, USA

    Charles B. Hodges

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Liu, H.P., Perera, S.M., Klein, J.W. (2017). Using Model-Based Learning to Promote Computational Thinking Education. In: Rich, P., Hodges, C. (eds) Emerging Research, Practice, and Policy on Computational Thinking. Educational Communications and Technology: Issues and Innovations. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52691-1_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52691-1_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-52690-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-52691-1

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation