Exploring Future Rural Development in the Poyang Lake Region

Part of the SpringerBriefs in Geography book series (BRIEFSGEOGRAPHY)


An agent-based computer model is developed to explore the effects of different subsidy policies and resilience of rural development in the PLR. The model represents land-use and livelihood decision making of farmer households in three types of villages that have poor, average, and rich farmland. Household agents allocate their labor between nonfarm and agricultural work, and make rice cropping choices. They also exchange farmland in a land rental market. Three policy scenarios are examined: subsidies to rice growers, subsidies to large farms, and subsidies to households that rent out their farmland for the long term. The model experiments are not intended to make quantitative predictions but to aid our understanding about (1) the nature and potential effects of these policies across different villages at different stages of development, and (2) how rural development may be affected by economic and environmental shocks. I discuss how policy may need to differentiate across locations and adapt in the near future to effectively promote rural development amid social and environmental changes.


Subsidy policy Rural development Land rental markets Agent-based modeling Economic and environmental shocks Resilience 


  1. Axtell, R., & Epstein, J. M. (1994). Agent-based modeling: Understanding our creations. The Bulletin of the Santa Fe Institute, 9(2), 28–32.Google Scholar
  2. Bloomberg Businessweek (2016, June 11). 东莞的周末静悄悄:机器人来了,工厂灯灭了. Retrieved September 01, 2016, from (in Chinese).
  3. Brown, D. G., Robinson, D. T., An, L., Nassauer, J. I., Zellner, M., Rand, W., et al. (2008). Exurbia from the bottom up: Confronting empirical challenges to characterizing complex systems. Geoforum, 39, 805–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Deng, X., Huang, J., Rozelle, S., & Uchida, E. (2006). Cultivated land conversion and potential agricultural productivity in China. Land Use Policy, 23(4), 372–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gale, H. F., Lohmar, B., & Tuan, F. C. (2005). China’s new farm subsidies. USDA-ERS WRS-05-01.Google Scholar
  6. Gale, H. F. (2013). Growth and evolution in China’s agricultural support policies (USDA-ERS Economic Research Report, 153). Washington, D.C.: United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. Retrieved from
  7. Gao, L., Huang, J., & Rozelle, S. (2012). Rental markets for cultivated land and agricultural investments in China. Agricultural Economics, 43, 391–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Grimm, V., Revilla, E., Berger, U., Jeltsch, F., Mooij, W. M., Railsback, S. F., et al. (2005). Pattern-oriented modeling of agent-based complex systems: Lessons from ecology. Science, 310, 987–991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hazell, P. B., & Rahman, A. (Eds.). (2014). New directions for smallholder agriculture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Heerink, N., Kuiper, M., & Shi, X. (2006). China’s new rural income support policy: Impacts on grain production and rural income inequality. China & World Economy, 14(6), 58–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Huang, J., Wang, X., Zhi, H., Huang, Z., & Rozelle, S. (2011). Subsidies and distortions in China’s agriculture: Evidence from producer-level data. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 55, 53–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Huang, J., Wang, X., & Rozelle, S. (2013). The subsidization of farming households in China’s agriculture. Food Policy, 41, 124–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lichtenberg, E., & Ding, C. (2008). Assessing farmland protection policy in China. Land Use Policy, 25(1), 59–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Liu, J., Liu, M., Tian, H., Zhuang, D., Zhang, Z., Zhang, W., & Deng, X. (2005). Spatial and temporal patterns of China’s cropland during 1990–2000: An analysis based on Landsat TM data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 98(4), 442–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ma, X., Heerink, N., van Ierland, E., Lang, H., & Shi, X. (2015). Land rental market development in rural China—Impact of tenure security and trust. Paper presented at the Annual World Bank Conference on Land and Poverty, Washington DC, March 23–27, 2015. Retrieved from
  16. Otsuka, K. (2013). Food insecurity, income inequality, and the changing comparative advantage in world agriculture. Agricultural Economics, 44(s1), 7–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Otsuka, K., Liu, Y., & Yamauchi, F. (2014). The future of small farms in Asia. In Paper for Future Agricultures Consortium.Google Scholar
  18. Rigg, J., Salamanca, A., & Thompson, E. C. (2016). The puzzle of East and Southeast Asia’s persistent smallholder. Journal of Rural Studies, 43, 118–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Robinson, S. (1997). Simulation model verification and validation: increasing the users’ confidence. In Proceedings of the 29th conference on winter simulation (pp. 53–59). IEEE Computer Society.Google Scholar
  20. Seto, K. C., Fragkias, M., Güneralp, B., & Reilly, M. K. (2011). A meta-analysis of global urban land expansion. PLoS One, 6(8), e23777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tian, Q., Holland, J. H., & Brown, D. G. (2016). Social and economic impacts of subsidy policies on rural development in the Poyang Lake Region, China: Insights from an agent-based model. Agricultural Systems, 148, 12–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Varian, H. R. (2002). Intermediate microeconomics: A modern approach. 6th ed. W. WNorton & Company. New York.Google Scholar
  23. World Agricultural Organization (FAO’s). (1990, 2000, and 2010). World Census of Agriculture (WCA). Retrieved from
  24. Yi, F., Sun, D., & Zhou, Y. (2015). Grain subsidy, liquidity constraints and food security-Impact of the grain subsidy program on the grain-sown areas in China. Food Policy, 50, 114–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Computational Social Science Program, Department of Computational and Data Sciences, College of ScienceGeorge Mason UniversityFairfaxUSA

Personalised recommendations