Understanding the Complex Processes Underlying Well-Being of Rural Households

Part of the SpringerBriefs in Geography book series (BRIEFSGEOGRAPHY)


An analysis of rural livelihoods is carried out to understand the micro- and macro-level processes that shape the well-being of rural households during urbanization. The analysis is based on quantitative surveys and qualitative interviews and field observations across eight villages around Poyang Lake. I examine rural households’ livelihoods against the broad development background in China, and within their local environmental contexts, which also define their exposure to flood hazards. While urbanization has a positive effect on reducing the sensitivity of rural livelihoods to flooding, a variety of constraints, including some institutional factors and macro-level processes, confront rural households in developing viable livelihoods. I discuss how development programs and policy may simultaneously promote rural development and mitigate flood impacts in the Poyang Lake area.


Rural livelihoods Rural-urban connection Policy and institutions Urbanization Flood impact mitigation • Understanding processes 


  1. Anjaria, J. S. (2006). Street hawkers and public space in Mumbai. Economic and Political Weekly, 2140–2146.Google Scholar
  2. Bebbington, A. (1999). Capitals and capabilities: A framework for analyzing peasant viability, rural livelihoods and poverty. World Development, 27, 2021–2044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berdegué, J. A., & Fuentealba, R. (2011, January). Latin America: The state of smallholders in agriculture. Paper presented at the IFAD Conference on New Directions for Smallholder Agriculture (Vol. 24, p. 25).Google Scholar
  4. Ellis, F. (1998). Household strategies and rural livelihood diversification. Journal of Development Studies, 35, 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cai, F. (2010). Demographic transition, demographic dividend, and Lewis Turning Point in China. China Economic Journal, 3(2), 107–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chi, F. (Ed.). (2000). China’s rural land system reform into 21st century. Beijing: China Economics Press (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  7. Cousins, B., Cousins, T., Hornby, D., Kingwill, R., Royston, L., & Smit, W. (2005). Will formalising property rights reduce poverty in South Africa’s ‘second economy?’ Questioning the mythologies of Hernando de Soto. Plaas Policy Brief, 18.Google Scholar
  8. Dandekar, H. (1997). Changing migration strategies in Deccan Maherashtra, India, 1885–1990. In J. Gugler (Ed.), Cities in the developing world: Issues, theory, and policy (pp. 48–62).Google Scholar
  9. Davis, M. (2006). Planet of slums. New Perspectives Quarterly, 23(2), 6–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. De Soto, H. (2000). Mystery of capital: Why capitalism triumphs in the West and fails everywhere else. New York: Basic books.Google Scholar
  11. Dong, S. (2008). The optimization path of reformation in rural land of China. Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press (In Chinese).Google Scholar
  12. Domeher, D., & Abdulai, R. (2012). Access to credit in the developing world: Does land registration matter? Third World Quarterly, 33(1), 161–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gilbert, A. (2002). On the mystery of capital and the myths of Hernando de Soto: What difference does legal title make? International Development Planning Review, 24(1), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Glauben, T., Herzfeld, T., Rozelle, S., & Wang, X. (2012). Persistent poverty in rural China: Where, why, and how to escape? World Development, 40(4), 784–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jellinek, L. (1997). Displaced by modernity: The saga of a Jakarta street-traders family from the 1940s to the 1990s. In J. Gugler (Ed.), Cities in the developing world: Issues, theory, and policy (pp. 139–155). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Johnston, B. F., & Mellor, J. W. (1961). The role of agriculture in economic development. The American Economic Review, 51(4), 566–593.Google Scholar
  17. Holstein, J. A., & Gubrium, J. F. (1995). The active interview. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Huang, P., & Peng, Y. (2007). The confluence of three historical trends and the prospects for small-scale agriculture in China. Social Sciences in China, 4, 006 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  19. Lewis, W. A. (1954). Economic development with unlimited supplies of labor. The Manchester School, 22, 139–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Li, Y., & Li, S. (1989). Deep barriers to rural reform on land rights. Chinese Rural Economy, 6, 43–49 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  21. Liu, Y. S., Fang, F., & Li, Y. H. (2014). Key issues of land use in China and implications for policy making. Land Use Policy, 40, 6–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Liu, L., & Han, X. (2006). Recommendations, issues and current status of the game between public and private rights of rural land Institutions. Jing Ji Zong Heng, 9, 10–12 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  23. Nurkse, R. (1961). Problems of capital formation in underdeveloped countries. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Palomar, J. (2002). Land tenure security as a market stimulator in China. Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law, 12, 7–74.Google Scholar
  25. Payne, G., Durand-Lasserve, A., & Rakodi, C. (2009). The limits of land titling and home ownership. Environment and Urbanization, 21(2), 443–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ray, D. (1998). Development economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Sjaastad, E., & Cousins, B. (2009). Formalisation of land rights in the South: An overview. Land Use Policy, 26(1), 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tan, S., Heerink, N., Kuyvenhoven, A., & Qu, F. (2010). Impact of land fragmentation on rice producers’ technical efficiency in South-East China. NJAS-Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 57, 117–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tian, Q., Brown, D. G., Zheng, L., Qi, S., Liu, Y., & Jiang, L. (2015). The role of cross-scale social and environmental contexts in household-level land-use decisions, Poyang Lake Region. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 105(6), 1240–1259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tian, Q., Guo, L., & Zheng, L. (2016). Urbanization and rural livelihoods: A case study from Jiangxi province, China. Journal of Rural Studies.Google Scholar
  31. Tian, Q., & Lemos, M. (in review). Rural vulnerability to climatic hazards in the context of urbanization: Evidence from China. World Development.Google Scholar
  32. Veeck, G., & Pannell, C. W. (1989). Rural economic restructuring and farm household income in Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 79(2), 275–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wei, Z. (1989). Discussion on agricultural land privatization under state management. Chinese Rural Economics, 5, 15–22 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  34. Wong, K., Fu, D., Li, C. Y., & Song, H. X. (2007). Rural migrant workers in urban China: Living a marginalised life. International Journal of Social Welfare, 16(1), 32–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Yao, Y., & Zhang, K. (2010). Has China passed the Lewis turning point? A structural estimation based on provincial data. China Economic Journal, 3(2), 155–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Yin, P. (2008). Study of China rural poverty under social exclusion. Beijing, China: Knowledge Rights Publishing House (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  37. Zhang, H. (2002). China’s rural land distributions and transfer of land use rights: Some comments. Guan Li Shi Jie, 5, 76–87 (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  38. Zhang, X., & Chen, L. (2005). Economic development at the village level. Wuhan, China: Wuhan University Press (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  39. Zhang, X., Yang, J., & Wang, S. (2011). China has reached the Lewis turning point. China Economic Review, 22(4), 542–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Computational Social Science Program, Department of Computational and Data Sciences, College of ScienceGeorge Mason UniversityFairfaxUSA

Personalised recommendations