Abstract
Information technology-enabled business process outsourcing (BPO) is a growing phenomenon; yet, little research has been conducted to understand the factors that determine its appropriateness for organisations and what capabilities they should seek in potential suppliers. A multi-perspective approach to the BPO decision, encompassing the transaction, the organisation and its context, is proposed and a set of supplier capabilities to deliver upon it is outlined. A case study of outsourced call centres in Australia, based upon interviews with three suppliers and three clients, suggests such a multi-perspective approach is useful but that the interaction between the factors shaping the BPO decision is more complex than envisaged. The case also suggests that a common set of capabilities is sought from suppliers – though it is narrower than first proposed.
Keyword
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Dibbern et al. (2004) identified 28 papers in the what category, 46 in the why and 36 in the how for the period 1988–2000.
- 2.
Melville et al. (2004) suggest that adopting such a synthesising approach is beneficial. While the existence of multiple competing theoretical approaches can provide varied insights, the resulting fragmentation and isolation can also limit the overall development of understanding in an area.
- 3.
Porter argued that five forces determine the attractiveness of an industry to a firm: bargaining power of buyers; bargaining power of suppliers; threat of new entrants; threat of substitute products or services and rivalry among existing firms.
- 4.
A commingled rival approach according to Yin (1984).
- 5.
With regard to the capabilities sought of suppliers, the underlying proposition in each case was that the capability was sought.
- 6.
Together they represent over 50% of the market.
- 7.
For example, codes related to Transaction cost theory included: TC-C (cost), TC-IT (information technology), TC-AS (asset specificity) and TC-U (uncertainty).
- 8.
See the section related to Proposition 4 for details on how these cost savings arise.
- 9.
By contrast, SUPPLIER3 and CLIENT3 were focused on changing the organisational culture.
- 10.
It might be interesting to determine whether this is because the working environment is largely irrelevant or whether clients take it for granted.
- 11.
The cases thus appear to lend support to the aside of Dibbern et al. (2004) that the why and what of outsourcing are interdependent.
References
Alborz, S, Seddon, P.B, and Scheepers, R (2004). Impact of Configuration on IT Outsourcing Relationships, Proceedings of the Tenth Americas Conference on Information Systems, (New York, August 2004). 3551–3560.
Ang, S, and Cummings, L.L (1997). Strategic Responses to Institutional Influences on Information Systems Outsourcing, Organization Science 8(3): 235–256.
Ang, S, and Straub, D (2002). Costs, Transaction Specific Investments and Vendor Dominance of the Marketplace: The economics of IS outsourcing, In R. Hirschheim, A. Heinzl, and J. Dibbern (eds.) Information Systems Outsourcing, Berlin: Springer, pp. 47–76.
Benbasat, I, Goldstein, D.K, and Mead, M (1987). The Case Study Research Strategy in Studies of Information Systems, MIS Quarterly 11(3): 369–386.
Bousfield, P. (2003). The Business Case for Call Centre Outsourcing, Interactive Marketing 5(2): 111–116.
Cheon, M.J, Grover, V, and Teng, J.T.C (1995). Theoretical Perspectives on the Outsourcing of Information Systems, Journal of Information Technology 10(4): 209–220.
Ciborra, C.U (1987). Research Agenda for a Transaction Costs Approach to Information Systems, In R.J. Boland and R.A. Hirschheim (eds.) Critical Issues in Information Systems Research, London: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 253–274.
Clemons, E.K, Reddi, S.P, and Row, M.C (1993). The Impact of Information Technology on the Organization of Economic Activity: The move to the middle hypothesis, Journal of Management Information Systems 10(2): 9–35.
Codling, P, and Miller, A (2004). Trends and Opportunities in the UK Market, London: Ovum.
Coyne, K.P (1986). The Anatomy of Sustainable Competitive Advantage, The McKinsey Quarterly 22(2): 50–65.
Dibbern, J., Goles, T., Hirschheim, R., and Jayatilaka, B. (2004). Information Systems Outsourcing: A survey and analysis of the literature, The Data Base for Advances in Information Systems 35(4): 6–102.
Dubé, L., and Paré, G (2003). Rigor in Information Systems Positivist Case Research: Current practices, trends, and recommendations, MIS Quarterly 27(4): 597–635.
Duncan, N.B (2002). IS Integration in the Internet Age, In R. Hirschheim, A. Heinzl, and J. Dibbern (eds.) Information Systems Outsourcing, Berlin: Springer, pp. 395–414.
Edwards, B. (2004). A World of Work, Economist 3–16 13th November.
Eisenhardt, K.M (1989). Building Theories form Case Study Research, Academy of Management Review 14(4): 532–550.
Feeny, D, Willcocks, L, and Lacity, M (2003). Business Process Outsourcing: The promise of the ‘enterprise partnership’ model, (http://www.templeton.ox.ac.uk/oxiim/bpo.htm) Templeton College, University of Oxford.
Feeny, D, Lacity, M, and Willcocks, L. (2005). Taking the Measure of Outsourcing Providers: Successful outsourcing of back office business functions requires knowing not only your company’s needs but also the 12 core capabilities that are key criteria for screening suppliers, Sloan Management Review 46(3): 41–49.
Feeny, D, and Willcocks, L. (1998). Core IS Capabilities for Exploiting Information Technology, Sloan Management Review 39(3): 9–20.
Goles, T. (2001). The Impact of the Client/Vendor Relationship on Outsourcing Success, unpublished dissertation, University of Houston.
Grover, V., Cheon, M.J, and Teng, J.T.C (1994). An Evaluation of the Impact of Corporate Strategy and the Role of Information Technology on IS Functional Outsourcing, European Journal of Information Systems 3(3): 179–190.
Hagel, J, and Seely Brown, J. (2001). Your Next IT Strategy, Harvard Business Review 79(9): 105–113.
Halvey, J.K, Halvey, J.H, and Melby, B.M (1996). Information Technology Outsourcing Transactions: Process, strategies and contracts, New York: John Wiley.
Hancox, M., and Hackney, R. (1999). Information Technology Outsourcing: Conceptualizing practice in the public and private sector, Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Science (Maui, Hawaii, January 1999) 5–8.
Jiang, J, Klein, G, and Carr, C (2002). Measuring Information System Service Quality: SERVQUAL from the other side, MIS Quarterly 26(2): 145–166.
Kakabadse, A., and Kakabadse, N (2005). Outsourcing: Current and future trends, Thunderbird International Business Review 47(2): 183–204.
Kern, T., and Willcocks, L. (2000). Exploring Information Technology Outsourcing Relationships: Theory and practice, Journal of Strategic Information Systems 9(4): 321–350.
Klein, H (2002). On the Theoretical Foundations of Current Outsourcing Research, In R. Hirschheim, A. Heinzl, and J. Dibbern (eds.) Information systems outsourcing, Berlin: Springer, pp. 24–44.
Kotter, J.P (1979). Managing External Dependence, Academy of Management Review 4(1): 87–92.
Lacity, M, and Hirschheim, R (1993). Information Systems Outsourcing: Myths, metaphors and realities, Wiley: Chichester.
Lacity, M.C, Willcocks, L.P, and Feeny, D.F (1996). The Value of Selective IT Sourcing, Sloan Management Review 37(3): 13–25.
Larsson, R, Brousseau, K.R, Driver, M.J, Holmquist, M, and Tarnovskaya, V (2003). International Growth through Co-operation: Brand driven strategies, leadership and career development in Sweden, Academy Management Executive 17(1): 45–51.
Levina, N, and Ross, J.W (2003). From the Vendor’s Perspective: Exploring the value proposition in information technology outsourcing, MIS Quarterly 27(3): 331–364.
Mata, F.J, Fuerst, W.L, and Barney, J.B (1995). Information Technology and Sustained Competitive Advantage, MIS Quarterly 19(4): 487–505.
McFarlan, F.W, and Nolan, R.L (1995). How to Manage an IT Outsourcing Alliance, Sloan Management Review 36(2): 9–23.
Melville, N, Kraemer, K, and Gurbaxani, V (2004). Information Technology and Organizational Performance: An integrative model of IT business value, MIS Quarterly 28(2): 283–322.
Michell, V., and Fitzgerald, G. (1997). The IT Outsourcing Market-Place: Vendors and their selection, Journal of Information Technology 12(3): 223–237.
Miles, M.B, and Huberman, A.M (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An expanded sourcebook, 2nd edn., Thousand Oaks: Sage.
North, D.C (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Patton, M.Q (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods, 3rd edn., Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Perez, C (1983). Structural Change and Assimilation of New Technologies in the Economic and Social Systems, Futures 15(5): 357–375.
Poppo, L., and Zenger, T. (1998). Testing Alternative Theories of the Firm: Transaction cost, knowledge based and measurement explanations for make-or-buy decisions in information services, Strategic Management Journal 19: 853–877.
Porter, M.E (1985). Competitive Advantage, New York: The Free Press.
Ramachandran, K., and Voleti, S. (2004). Business Process Outsourcing (BPO): Emerging scenario and strategic options for IT-enabled services, Interfaces 29(1): 49–62.
Rouse, A.C, and Corbitt, B. (2004). IT Supported Business Process Outsourcing (BPO): The good, the bad and the ugly, Proceedings of Eighth Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (Shanghai, China, July 2004) 8–11.
Sabherwal, R., Hirschheim, R., and Goles, T. (2001). The Dynamics of Alignment: Insights from a punctuated equilibrium model, Organization Science 12(2): 179–197.
Saunders, C, Gebelt, M, and Hu, Q (1997). Achieving Success in Information Systems Outsourcing, California Management Review 39(2): 63–79.
Sengupta, K., and Zviran, M. (1997). Measuring User Satisfaction in an Outsourcing Environment, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 44(4): 414–421.
Sharma, R., and Yetton, P. (1996). Interorganizational Cooperation to Develop Information Systems, Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Information Systems (Cleveland, OH, 16–18 December 1996) 122–132.
Sheffi, Y (2005). The Resilient Enterprise: Overcoming vulnerability for competitive advantage, Boston: MIT Press.
Tas, J, and Sunder, S. (2004). Financial Services Business Process Outsourcing, Communications of the ACM 47(5): 50–52.
Technology Partners (2004). BPO/IT Bundling:, Position paper, Dallas Texas: Technology Partners.
Thompson, R.L. (1967). Organizations in Action, New York: McGraw-Hill.
Tornbohm, C, and Andrault, M. (2005). User Survey: Business process outsourcing, Western Europe, 2004 (executive summary), Report ID: G00126191, Gartner Group.
Wernerfelt, B (1984). A Resource-Based View of the Firm, Strategic Management Journal 5(2): 171–180.
Williamson, O.E (1986). Economic Organization: Firms, markets and policy, Brighton: Wheatsheaf.
Yin, R (1984). Case Study Research: Design and methods, Beverly Hills: Sage.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Borman, M. (2017). Applying Multiple Perspectives to the BPO Decision: A Case Study of Call Centres in Australia. In: Willcocks, L., Lacity, M., Sauer, C. (eds) Outsourcing and Offshoring Business Services. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52651-5_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52651-5_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-52650-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-52651-5
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)