Skip to main content

Researching Male Sexual Victimisation: ‘The Personal Is Political’

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Male Rape, Masculinities, and Sexualities

Part of the book series: Palgrave Hate Studies ((PAHS))

  • 906 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter critically discusses the research methods used in this book. The empirical research took on a qualitative approach. Because male rape is a sensitive issue, it is important and essential to give some consideration to the literature on researching sensitive topics, and the difficulties for the writer researching such a sensitive topic, such as the stigma it creates for the writer in a professional and personal capacity. This will be supplemented with a discussion of the importance of reflexivity; the author talks about his own experience of rape and places this in an academic context, using sociological and criminological literature on reflexivity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Qualitative researchers rarely do a 9 a.m.–5 p.m. working day and often our work is taken home.

References

  • Abdullah-Khan, N. (2008). Male Rape: The Emergence of a Social and Legal Issue. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Allport, G. W. (1963). Forward. In N. L. Farberow (Ed.), Taboo Topics. New York: Atherton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Attwood, F. (2010). Dirty Work: Researching Women and Sexual Representation. In R. Ryan-Flood & R. Gill (Eds.), Secrecy and Silence in the Research Process (pp. 177–187). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloor, M., Fincham, B., & Sampson, H. (2010). Unprepared for the Worst: Risks of Harm for Qualitative Researchers. Methodological Innovations Online, 5(1), 45–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bondi, L. (2003). Empathy and Identification: Conceptual Resources for Feminist Fieldwork. ACME: An International e-Journal for Critical Geographies, 2(1), 64–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V. (1999). Breaking a Taboo? Talking (and Laughing) About the Vagina. Feminism and Psychology, 9(3), 367–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bullock, C. M., & Beckson, M. (2011). Male Victims of Sexual Assault: Phenomenology, Psychology, Physiology. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 39, 197–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, J. N. (2014). A Crime of Identity: Rape and Its Neglected Victims. Journal of Human Rights, 13(2), 146–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, C., & Bochner, A. P. (2000). Autoethnography, Personal Narrative, Reflexivity: Researcher as Subject. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (2nd ed., pp. 733–768). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, C., Adams, T. E., & Bochner, A. P. (2011). Autoethonography: An Overview. Qualitative Social Research, 12(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1976). Truth and Power. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), Essential Works of Foucault (Vol. 3, pp. 111–133). New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, H. G. (1995). Truth and Method. New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerrish, K., & Lacey, A. (2006). The Research Process in Nursing (5th ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2007). Ethnography: Principles in Practice (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • hooks, B. (1999). Remembered Rapture: The Writer at Work. New York: Henry Holt and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • hooks, B. (2004). The Will to Change: Men, Masculinity, and Love. New York: Washington Square Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huff, J. (1997). The Sexual Harassment of Researchers by Research Subjects: Lessons from the Field. In M. Schwartz (Ed.), Researching Sexual Violence Against Women: Methodological and Personal Perspectives (pp. 115–128). London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Irvine, J. M. (2012). “Can’t Ask, Can’t Tell”: How Institutional Review Boards Keep Sex in the Closet. Contexts, 11(2), 28–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Israel, T. (2002). Studying Sexuality: Strategies for Surviving Stigma. Feminism and Psychology, 12(2), 256–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaspal, R. (2017). Coping with Perceived Ethnic Prejudice on the Gay Scene. Journal of LGBT Youth, 14(2), 172–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Javaid, A. (2018a). Out of Place: Sexualities, Sexual Violence, and Heteronormativity. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 39, 83–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Javaid, A. (2018b). Masculinities, Sexualities and Love. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, R. M. (1993). Doing Research on Sensitive Topics. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee-Treweek, G., & Linkogle, S. (Eds.). (2000). Danger in the Field: Risk and Ethics in Social Research. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumsden, K., & Winter, A. (2014). Reflexivity in Criminological Research. In K. Lumsden & A. Winter (Eds.), Reflexivity in Criminological Research: Experiences with the Powerful and the Powerless. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J. (2002). Qualitative Researching. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIlveen, P. (2008). Autoethnography as a Method for Reflexive Research and Practice in Vocational Psychology. Australian Journal of Career Development, 17(2), 13–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messerschmidt, J. (2017). ‘Masculinities and Femicide’. Qualitative Sociology Review, XIII(3), 71–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreno, E. (1995). Rape in the Field: Reflections From a Survivor. In D. Kulick & M. Wilson (Eds.), Taboo: Sex, Identity, and Erotic Subjectivity in Anthropological Fieldwork (pp. 166–189). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrow, S. L. (2006). Honor and Respect: Feminist Collaborative Research with Sexually Abused Women. In C. T. Fischer (Ed.), Qualitative Research Methods for Psychologists: Introduction Through Empirical Studies (1st ed., pp. 143–172). London: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Morse, J. M., & Field, P. A. (1995). Qualitative Research Methods for Health Professionals. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Motsemme, N. (2004). The Mute Always Speak: On Women’s Silences at the Truth and Reconciliation Commission. Current Sociology, 52(5), 909–932.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narayan, K. (1993). How Native Is a ‘Native’ Anthropologist? American Anthropologist, 95(3), 671–686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oakley, A. (1981). Interviewing Women: A Contradiction in Terms. In H. Roberts (Ed.), Doing Feminist Research. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, I. (1999). Critical Reflexive Humanism and Critical Constructionist Psychology. In D. Nightingale & J. Cromby (Eds.), Social Constructionist Psychology a Critical Analysis of Theory and Practice (1st ed., pp. 23–36). Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pattillo-McCoy, M., & Buford, R. (2000). Do You See What I See? Examining a Collaborative Ethnography. Qualitative Inquiry, 6(1), 65–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pomeroy, W. B. (1963). Human Sexual Behaviour. In N. L. Farberow (Ed.), Taboo Topics. New York: Atherton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinharz, S. (1992). Feminist Methods in Social Research. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumney, P. (2008). Policing Male Rape and Sexual Assault. Journal of Criminal Law, 72(1), 67–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rumney, P. (2009). Gay Male Rape Victims: Law Enforcement, Social Attitudes and Barriers to Recognition. The International Journal of Human Rights, 13(2), 233–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scarce, M. (1997). Male on Male Rape: The Hidden Toll of Stigma and Shame. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, L., & Wise, S. (1983). Breaking Out: Feminist Consciousness and Feminist Research. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, L., & Wise, S. (1993). Breaking Out Again: Feminist Ontology and Epistemology. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sultana, F. (2007). Reflexivity, Positionality and Participatory Ethics: Negotiating Fieldwork Dilemmas in International Research. An International e-Journal for Critical Geographies, 6(3), 374–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walby, K. (2010). Interviews as Encounters: Issues of Sexuality and Reflexivity When Men Interview Men About Commercial Same Sex Relations. Qualitative Research, 10(6), 639–657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, K. G. (2010). Male Sexual Victimization: Examining Men’s Experiences of Rape and Sexual Assault. Men and Masculinities, 12(3), 275–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aliraza Javaid .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Javaid, A. (2018). Researching Male Sexual Victimisation: ‘The Personal Is Political’. In: Male Rape, Masculinities, and Sexualities. Palgrave Hate Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52639-3_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52639-3_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-52638-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-52639-3

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics