Skip to main content

Demystifying Facilitation: A New Approach to Investigating the Role of Facilitation in Group Decision Support Processes

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Group Decision and Negotiation. Theory, Empirical Evidence, and Application (GDN 2016)

Abstract

We believe there are still gaps in our knowledge of the facilitator role in group decision support processes and these must be “de-mystified” if use of these methods is to become more widespread. We use the design and analysis of online group model building to form a better understanding of the facilitator role. Our experimental configuration makes use of Group Explorer (Decision Explorer), configured to be delivered across the Internet in a distributed manner. The facilitator is thus no more or less visible in the workshop as any other participant. Data from a workshop is analysed and the findings discussed in relation to the following works; (i) Callon on translation, (ii) Hiltz et al. on the problem of animating methodology, and (iii) White and Taket’s “death of the expert”. We conclude by discussing one possible end-point of this work – the rise of a participant-led group decision support process model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The initial issue explored was how to support asynchronous modelling too. The Group Explorer setup was left running all weekend, hence the date range, to enable issues to be added and connected in the model without the facilitator being present at the client console. Whilst it worked technically, it was decided fairly quickly that this mode of working would not be explored further. However, we already have requirements for distributed workshops that will involve stakeholders separated by many time zones and the methodological issues raised by periods of un-facilitated participation could thus be investigated with the same experimental setup.

References

  1. Eden, C.E., Radford, J.E.: Tackling Strategic Problems: The Role of Group Decision Support. SAGE, London (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rosenhead, J.: What’s the problem? An introduction to problem structuring methods. Interfaces 26, 117–131 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Eden, C., Ackermann, F.: Where next for problem structuring methods. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 57, 766–768 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bell, S., Morse, S.: Groups and facilitators within problem structuring processes. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 64, 959–972 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Joldersma, C., Roelofs, E.: The impact of soft OR-methods on problem structuring. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 152, 696–708 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Morton, A., Ackermann, F., Belton, V.: Problem structuring without workshops? Experiences with distributed interaction within a PSM process. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 58, 547–556 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Montibeller, G., Shaw, D., Westcombe, M.: Using decision support systems to facilitate the social process of knowledge management. Knowl. Manag. Res. Pract. 4, 125–137 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Eden, C., Ackermann, F.: Cognitive mapping expert views for policy analysis in the public sector. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 152, 615–630 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ackermann, F., Eden, C.: Making Strategy: Mapping Out Strategic Success. SAGE, London (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Garfinkel, H.: Ethnomethodology’s program. Soc. Psychol. Q. 59, 5–21 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. White, L., Burger, K., Yearworth, M.: Understanding behaviour in problem structuring methods interventions with activity theory. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 249, 983–1004 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. White, L., Yearworth, M., Burger, K.: Understanding PSM interventions through sense-making and the mangle of practice lens. In: Kamiński, B., Kersten, Gregory, E., Szapiro, T. (eds.) GDN 2015. LNBIP, vol. 218, pp. 13–27. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-19515-5_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Tavella, E., Franco, A.L.: Dynamics of group knowledge production in facilitated modelling workshops: an exploratory study. Group Decis. Negot. 24, 451–475 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Franco, A.L., Greiffenhaggen, C.: Unpacking the complexity of group problem structuring. In: Kamiński, B., Kersten, G., Szufel, P., Jakubczyk, M., Wachowicz, T. (eds.) 15th International Conference on Group Decision and Negotiation Letters, pp. 33–34. Warsaw School of Economics Press, Warsaw (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Callon, M.: Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. In: Law, J. (ed.) A New Sociology of Knowledge?, pp. 196–229. Routledge, London (1986). Power, action & belief

    Google Scholar 

  16. White, L.: Understanding problem structuring methods interventions. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 199, 823–833 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hiltz, S.R., Dufner, D., Fjermestad, J., Kim, Y., Ocker, R., Rana, A., Turoff, M.: Distributed group support systems: theory development and experimentation. In: Olson, G.M., Malone, T.W., Smith, J.B. (eds.) Coordination Theory and Collaboration Technology. Psychology Press, UK (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  18. White, L., Taket, A.: The death of the expert. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 45, 733–748 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Schein, E.H.: Process Consultation: Lessons for Managers and Consultants, vol. 2. Addison-Wesley, Boston (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tavella, E., Papadopoulos, T.: Expert and novice facilitated modelling: a case of a viable system model workshop in a local food network. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 66, 247–264 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Scott, R.J., Cavana, R.Y., Cameron, D.: Recent evidence on the effectiveness of group model building. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 249, 908–918 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ventura, A., Dias, L., Clímaco, J.: On facilitating group decision making processes with VIP analysis. In: Zaraté, P., Kersten, G.E., Hernández, J.E. (eds.) GDN 2014. LNBIP, vol. 180, pp. 246–253. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-07179-4_28

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rouwette, E.A.J.A.: Facilitated modelling in strategy development: measuring the impact on communication, consensus and commitment. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 62, 879–887 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rouwette, E., Bastings, I., Blokker, H.: A comparison of group model building and strategic options development and analysis. Group Decis. Negot. 20, 781–803 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Papamichail, K.N., Alves, G., French, S., Yang, J.B., Snowdon, R.: Facilitation practices in decision workshops. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 58, 614–632 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Belton, V., Harvey, P., Rouwette, E., van Zijderveld, E.J.A., Morrill, N., Shaw, D.: Transferring PSM craft skills in a 2 hour session. In: 49th Annual Conference of the Operational Research Society, OR49, pp. 93–105 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Henning, P., Chen, W.C.: Systems thinking: common ground or untapped territory? Syst. Res. Behav. Sci. 29, 470–483 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Buckle-Henning, P., Wilmshurst, J., Yearworth, M.: Understanding systems thinking: an agenda for applied research in industry. In: 56th Meeting of the International Society for the Systems Sciences, San Jose, USA (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Keys, P.: OR as technology: some issues and implications. In: Keys, P. (ed.) Understanding the Process of Operational Research: Collected Readings. Wiley, Chichester (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Keys, P.: On becoming expert in the use of problem structuring methods. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 57, 822–829 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Keys, P.: OR as technology - some issues and implications. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 40, 753–759 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Keys, P.: OR as technology revisited. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 49, 99–108 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. White, L., Burger, K., Yearworth, M.: Big data and behaviour in OR: towards a ‘Smart OR’. In: Kunc, M., Malpass, J., White, L. (eds.) Behavioral Operational Research: Theory, Methodology and Practice. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Yearworth, M., White, L., Ormerod, R.: The performative idiom and PSMs. In: 27th European Conference on Operational Research (EURO 2015), Glasgow, Scotland (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  35. White, L., Yearworth, M., Burger, K.: Understanding PSM interventions through sense-making and the mangle of practice lens. In: Kamiński, B., Kersten, G., Szapiro, T. (eds.) 15th International Conference on Group Decision and Negotiation (GDN 2015). Warsaw, Poland (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Connell, N.A.D.: Evaluating soft OR: some reflections on an apparently ‘unsuccessful’ implementation using a Soft Systems Methodology (SSM) based approach. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 52, 150–160 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Packer, M.J., Goicoechea, J.: Sociocultural and constructivist theories of learning: ontology, not just epistemology. Educ. Psychol. 35, 227–241 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. White, L.: Evaluating problem-structuring methods: developing an approach to show the value and effectiveness of PSMs. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 57, 842–855 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Callon, M.: The role of lay people in the production and dissemination of scientific knowledge. Sci. Technol. Soc. 4, 81–94 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. White, L.: Behavioural operational research: towards a framework for understanding behaviour in OR interventions. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 249, 827–841 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Midgley, G., Cavana, R.Y., Brocklesby, J., Foote, J.L., Wood, D.R.R., Ahuriri-Driscoll, A.: Towards a new framework for evaluating systemic problem structuring methods. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 229, 143–154 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Davis, J., MacDonald, A., White, L.: Problem-structuring methods and project management: an example of stakeholder involvement using hierarchical process modelling methodology. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 61, 893–904 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Checkland, P., Scholes, J.: Soft Systems Methodology in Action: Including a 30-Year Retrospective. Wiley, Chichester (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Westcombe, M., Franco, L.A., Shaw, D.: Where next for PSMs - a grassroots revolution? J. Oper. Res. Soc. 57, 776–778 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Ranyard, J.C., Fildes, R., Hu, T.-I.: Reassessing the scope of OR practice: the influences of problem structuring methods and the analytics movement. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 245, 1–13 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the four anonymous reviewers for their useful review of our paper. We are indebted to Colin Eden for providing Group Explorer software and his patience, and that of Iain Small, in supporting a very non standard installation. We would also like to thank Paul Shabajee who helped with the first online workshop and provided input based on experience in investigating the user requirements for the STEEP collaborative stakeholder engagement platform (https://tools.smartsteep.eu/wiki/STEEP_Platform). We would also like to thank Alberto Franco and Ashley Carreras for their tutorial on Group Explorer at Euro 2015. This work was supported in part by (i) the EPSRC funded Industrial Doctorate Centre in Systems (Grant EP/G037353/1), (ii) the Innovate UK/NERC project Healthy Resilient Cities: Building a Business Case for Adaptation (Grant NE/N007360/1) and (iii) the EU FP7-ENERGY-SMARTCITIES-2012 (314277) project STEEP (Systems Thinking for Comprehensive City Efficient Energy Planning).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mike Yearworth .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

Appendix A Installation Notes for Group Explorer in MS Azure

These notes are designed to help installing Group Explorer in Microsoft’s Azure cloud computing environment using Windows Server 2008 R2 SP1 Virtual Machines (VMs) and refers to Group Explorer V2.1 User’s Guide v2.1.3 and install files PublicSetup-v2.exe dated 28th March 2013 and ChauffeurSetup-v2.exe dated 9th December 2012.

Part 1 – Creating the VMs, network, and assigning correct IP addresses

  • Create a suitable Microsoft Azure subscription

  • Create a virtual network

    • Name: netnameXXXX

    • start address 192.168.0.0

    • CIDR/24(251) - creates a submask of 255.255.255.0

  • Create the first virtual machine to host the Public computer

    • Compute->Virtual Machine->From Gallery->Windows Server 2008 R2 SP1

    • Name: PublicXXXX (whatever is needed to guarantee a unique name)

    • Region/Affinity: netnameXXXX

    • Endpoint: HTTP

    • Endpoint: GroupExplorerXXXX 8085

  • Download the RDP connection file for PublicXXXX

  • Connect to PublicXXXX

  • Install dropbox

  • Install Azure Powershell

  • Shutdown Public

  • Create the second virtual machine to host the Chauffeur computer

    • Compute->Virtual Machine->From Gallery->Windows Server 2008 R2 SP1

    • Name: ChauffeurXXXX (whatever is needed to guarantee a unique name)

    • Region/Affinity: netnameXXXX

    • Endpoint: HTTP

    • Endpoint: GroupExplorerXXXX 8085

  • Download the RDP connection file

  • Install dropbox

  • Install Azure Powershell

  • get credentials

  • Configure IP address of PublicXXXX using Azure Powershell

  • Shutdown ChauffeurXXXX

  • Startup Public

  • Check IP address of PublicXXXX

  • Connect PublicXXXX

  • Configure IP address of ChauffeurXXXX using Azure Powershell

  • Startup ChauffeurXXXX

  • Check IP address of ChauffeurXXXX

Part 2 – Installing Public

  • On PublicXXXX

  • Find the SQL Server 2008 R2 installer download page on the Microsoft website

  • Download the installation file SQLEXPR_x86_ENU.EXE

  • Start the SQL Server 2008 R2 install process by running SQLEXPR_x86_ENU.EXE

  • Kill the install process to preserve extracted distribution

  • Find and copy the extracted distribution tree for SQL Server 2008 R2 to Downloads

  • Start Public Install as per the Group Explorer Install Manual

  • When Group Explorer Installer starts the SQL Server installer change location of source to Downloaded file

  • Let Public install finish

Part 3 – Installing Chauffeur

  • Login to ChauffeurXXXX

  • Start Chauffeur Install as per the Group Explorer Install Manual

  • Let Chauffeur install finish

Appendix B Joining Instructions for an Online Meeting

Appendix C Online Meeting Configuration Checklist

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Yearworth, M., White, L. (2017). Demystifying Facilitation: A New Approach to Investigating the Role of Facilitation in Group Decision Support Processes. In: Bajwa, D., Koeszegi, S., Vetschera, R. (eds) Group Decision and Negotiation. Theory, Empirical Evidence, and Application. GDN 2016. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 274. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52624-9_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics