Attractor Density Clustering

  • T. L. CarrollEmail author
  • J. M. Byers
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems book series (LNNS, volume 6)


Stationary dynamical systems have invariant measures (or densities) that are characteristic of the particular dynamical system. We develop a method to characterize this density by partitioning the attractor into the smallest regions in phase space that contain information about the structure of the attractor. To accomplish this, we develop a statistic that tells us if we get more information about our data by dividing a set of data points into partitions rather than just lumping all the points together. We use this method to show that not only can we detect small changes in an attractor from a circuit experiment, but we can also distinguish between a large set of numerically generated chaotic attractors designed by Sprott


Gaussian Mixture Model Chaotic Attractor Dirichlet Distribution Attractor Density Gaussian Mixture Model Method 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    J.D. Farmer, J.J. Sidorowich, Predicting chaotic time series. Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 845–848 (1987)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    G. Sugihara, R.M. May, Nonlinear forecasting as a way of distinguishing chaos from measurement error in time series. Nature 344, 734–741 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    M. Casdagli, Nonlinear prediction of chaotic time series. Phys. D 35, 335–356 (1989)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    B.R. Hunt et al., Efficient data assimilation for spatiotemporal chaos: a local ensemble transform Kalman filter. Phys. D 230, 112–126 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    R. Brown et al., Modeling and synchronizing chaotic systems from time-series data. Phys. Rev. E 49, 3784–3800 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    G.P. King et al., Phase portraits from a time series: a singular system approach. Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 2, 379–390 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    T. Buzug, G. Pfister, Optimal delay time and embedding dimension for delay-time coordinates by analysis of the global static and local dynamical behavior of strange attractors. Phys. Rev. A 45, 7073 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    P. Grassberger, I. Procaccia, Measuring the strangeness of strange attractors. Phys. D Nonlinear Phenom. 9, 189–208 (1983)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. Wood et al., A behavioral modeling approach to nonlinear model-order reduction for RF/microwave ICs and systems. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theor. Tech. 52, 2274–2284 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    J.-P. Eckmann, D. Ruelle, Ergodic theory of chaos and strange attractors. Rev. Modern Phys. 57, 617–656 (1985)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    N.H. Packard et al., Geometry from a time series. Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 712–716 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    R.V. Donner et al., Recurrence-based analysis by means of complex network methods. Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos 21, 1019–1046 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    H. Suetani et al., Manifold learning approach for chaos in the dripping faucet. Phys. Rev. E 86, 036209 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    J.D. Farmer, Information dimension and the probabilistic structure of chaos. Zeitschrift fur Naturforschung A (Astrophysik, Physik und Physikalische Chemie) 37A, 1304–1325 (1982)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    M.D. Todd et al., Using chaotic interrogation and attractor nonlinear cross-prediction error to detect fastener preload loss in an aluminum frame. Chaos Interdiscip. J. Nonlinear Sci. 14, 387–399 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    T.L. Carroll, J.M. Byers, Grid-based partitioning for comparing attractors. Phys. Rev. E 93, 042206 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    H.D.I. Abarbanel et al., The analysis of observed chaotic data in physical systems. Rev. Modern Phys. 65, 1331–1392 (1993)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    T.M. Cover, J.M. Thomas, Elements of Information Theory (Wiley, New York, 2006)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    S. Kullback, R.A. Leibler, On information and sufficiency. Ann. Math. Stat. 22, 79–86 (1951)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    J.C. Sprott, Some simple chaotic flows. Phys. Rev. E 50, 647–650 (1994)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    L.M. Pecora, L. Moniz, J. Nichols, T.L. Carroll, Chaos: an interdisciplinary. J. Nonlinear Sci. 17, 013110-9 (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.US Naval Research LabWashington, DCUSA

Personalised recommendations