Skip to main content

Ecologies of Practice

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Engaging Adolescent Learners

Abstract

Through current research evidence, anecdotal experiences portrayed in the research to praxis sections and country-specific images of practice, we hope the chapters of this book have highlighted the tremendous potential and power of the adolescent developmental period. Education systems, schools and teachers all play important roles in how the schooling experience of adolescents unfolds. Since such a significant portion of their sense of self develops through their interactions and explorations with people and ideas at school, we can no longer leave to chance what happens during the middle years of learning. Bringing the science and research of adolescence and adolescent schooling to life through the lens of story was the best way we believed we could help our readers see just what is possible when we deliberately create a learning environment suited to the unique developmental needs of these learners. The images of practice brought to life in the pages of this book cross cultural and linguistic borders of countries, whose education systems reflect policies and practices deeply rooted in long-held beliefs about what it means to be an educated citizen of the country. Common to the images of practice from all three countries, however, is the constant search for how to ameliorate the schooling experience for adolescent learners by challenging the existing discourse on what is believed to be possible during the middle years of learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The average German teacher teaching adolescents in a secondary school has a teaching load of 26 lessons of 45 minutes duration. Many of these lessons are combined to 90 minute block lessons today, but the overall teaching load in Germany is still comparatively high by international standards.

References

  • Alberta Education. (2010). Inspiring education: A dialogue with Albertans. Retrieved from https://inspiring.education.alberta.ca/what-is-inspiring-education/

  • Alberta Education. (2013). Ministerial Order (#001/2013) goals and standards applicable to the provision of education. Retrieved from http://education.alberta.ca/department/policy/standards/goals.aspx

  • Altrichter, H., et al. (2017). Lehrerinnen und Lehrer erforschen ihren Unterricht: Unterrichtsentwicklung und Unterrichtsevaluation durch Aktionsforschung. Stuttgart: UTB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchhaas-Birkholz, D. (2009). Die “empirische Wende” in der Bildungspolitik und in der Bildungsforschung. Zum Paradigmenwechsel des BMBF im Bereich der Forschungsfonsforsc. Erziehungswissenschaft, 20(39), 27–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • City, E., Elmore, R., Fiarman, S., & Teitel, L. (2009). Instructional rounds in education: A network approach to improving teaching and learning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Educational Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunleavy, J., Milton, P., & Willms, J. D. (2012). Trends in intellectual engagement. What did you do in School Today? Research Series Report Number Three. Toronto: Canadian Education Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felten, M. (2016). Nur Lernbegleiter? Unsinn, Lehrer!: Lob der Unterrichtslenkung. Berlin: Cornelsen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friesen, S. (2009). What did you do in school today? Teaching effectiveness: A framework and rubric. Toronto: Canadian Education Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heikkinen, H. L. T., Aho, J., & Korhonen, H. (2015). Ope ei saa oppia: opettajankoulutuksen jatkumon kehittäminen. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmke, A., & Schrader, F.-W. (2014). Angebots-Nutzungs-Modell. In M. A. Wirtz (Ed.), Dorsch -Nutzungs-Modelljankoulu (pp. 149–150). Bern: Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunziker, D. (2017). Hokuspokus Kompetenz? Kompetenzorientiertes Lehren und Lernen ist keine Zauberei. Bern: Hep.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, D., & Temperley, J. (2007). From professional learning community to networked learning community. In Professional learning communities: Divergence, depth and dilemmas. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill/Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jardine, D., Clifford, P., & Friesen, S. (2008). 21st Century learning and learners. Western and Northern Canadian Curriculum Protocol.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahl, R., & Fratton, P. (2014). Lass mir die Welt, verschule sie nicht!: Warum Leben und Lernen unzertrennlich sind. Weinheim: Beltz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunter, M., & Trautwein, U. (2013). Psychologie des Unterrichts. Paderborn: Scherborn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K. (2006). Transformational school leadership in a transactional world. In The Jossey-bass reader on educational leadership (pp. 183–196). San Francisco: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liessmann, K. P. (2014). Geisterstunde: Die Praxis der Unbildung. Eine Streitschrift. Vienna: Paul Zsolnay Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipowsky, F. (2016). Unterricht entwickeln und Lehrpersonen professionalisieren. Ans unzertrennlich sindF im Bereich der Forschung. P terrich, 66(7–8), 76–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinsey & Company. (2009). Shaping the future: How good educations systems can become great in the decade ahead. Report on the international education roundtable, Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Core Curriculum for Basic Education. (2014). Helsinki: National Board of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Opetus- ja kulttuuriministeriö. (2016). Opettajankoulutuksen kehittämisohjelma. Helsinki: Lönnberg Print & Promo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, A. (2014). An introduction to discipline-based inquiry learning. [Video]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RVhKTMFCgq0

  • Rasfeld, M., & Spiegel, P. (2012). EduAction – Wir machen Schule. Hamburg: Murmann Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rautiainen, M., & Kostiainen, E. (2015). Finland: Policy and vision. In T. Corner (Ed.), Education in the European Union (pp. 91–108). London: Bloomsbury Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riegel, E. (2005). Schule kann gelingen. Wie unsere Kinder wirklich fmproved-schoolen. Frankfurt: Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, V. (2011). Student-centered leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumble, P., & Aspland, T. (2009). In search of the middle school teacher: What differentiates the middle school teacher from other teachers. Conference presentation, October 3, 2009. Canberra: Australian Curriculum Studies Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • School Health Promotion Study 2015. Helsinki: National Institute for Health and Welfare. https://www.thl.fi/fi/tutkimus-ja-asiantuntijatyo/vaestotutkimukset/kouluterveyskysely/tulokset

  • Stoll, L., Bolam, R., McMahon, A., et al. (2006). Professional Learning Communities: A Review of the Literature. Journal of Educational Change., 7(4), 221–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suoranta, J. (2003). Kasvatus mediakulttuurissa. Tampere: Vastapaino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timperley, H. (2008). Teacher professional learning and development, The educational practices series – 18. J. Brophy (Ed.). Brussels: International Academy of Education & International Bureau of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timperley, H., Wilson, A., Barrar, H., & Fung, I. (2007). Teacher professional learning and development: Best evidence synthesis iteration Wellington. New Zealand: Ministry of Education. http://educationcounts.edcentre.govt.nz/goto/BES.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trautmann, M., & Wischer, B. (2011). Heterogenitdiakulttuurissa. Mitja-asiantuntijatyo/vaes. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willms, J. D. (2003). Student engagement at school: A sense of belonging and participation. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willms, J. D., Friesen, S. & Milton, P. (2009). What did you do in school today? Transforming classrooms through social, academic, and intellectual engagement (First National Report). Toronto: Canadian Education Association.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Yee, B., Sliwka, A., Rautiainen, M. (2018). Ecologies of Practice. In: Engaging Adolescent Learners. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52602-7_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52602-7_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-52601-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-52602-7

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics