Abstract
Through current research evidence, anecdotal experiences portrayed in the research to praxis sections and country-specific images of practice, we hope the chapters of this book have highlighted the tremendous potential and power of the adolescent developmental period. Education systems, schools and teachers all play important roles in how the schooling experience of adolescents unfolds. Since such a significant portion of their sense of self develops through their interactions and explorations with people and ideas at school, we can no longer leave to chance what happens during the middle years of learning. Bringing the science and research of adolescence and adolescent schooling to life through the lens of story was the best way we believed we could help our readers see just what is possible when we deliberately create a learning environment suited to the unique developmental needs of these learners. The images of practice brought to life in the pages of this book cross cultural and linguistic borders of countries, whose education systems reflect policies and practices deeply rooted in long-held beliefs about what it means to be an educated citizen of the country. Common to the images of practice from all three countries, however, is the constant search for how to ameliorate the schooling experience for adolescent learners by challenging the existing discourse on what is believed to be possible during the middle years of learning.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The average German teacher teaching adolescents in a secondary school has a teaching load of 26 lessons of 45 minutes duration. Many of these lessons are combined to 90 minute block lessons today, but the overall teaching load in Germany is still comparatively high by international standards.
References
Alberta Education. (2010). Inspiring education: A dialogue with Albertans. Retrieved from https://inspiring.education.alberta.ca/what-is-inspiring-education/
Alberta Education. (2013). Ministerial Order (#001/2013) goals and standards applicable to the provision of education. Retrieved from http://education.alberta.ca/department/policy/standards/goals.aspx
Altrichter, H., et al. (2017). Lehrerinnen und Lehrer erforschen ihren Unterricht: Unterrichtsentwicklung und Unterrichtsevaluation durch Aktionsforschung. Stuttgart: UTB.
Buchhaas-Birkholz, D. (2009). Die “empirische Wende” in der Bildungspolitik und in der Bildungsforschung. Zum Paradigmenwechsel des BMBF im Bereich der Forschungsfonsforsc. Erziehungswissenschaft, 20(39), 27–33.
City, E., Elmore, R., Fiarman, S., & Teitel, L. (2009). Instructional rounds in education: A network approach to improving teaching and learning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Educational Press.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.
Dunleavy, J., Milton, P., & Willms, J. D. (2012). Trends in intellectual engagement. What did you do in School Today? Research Series Report Number Three. Toronto: Canadian Education Association.
Felten, M. (2016). Nur Lernbegleiter? Unsinn, Lehrer!: Lob der Unterrichtslenkung. Berlin: Cornelsen.
Friesen, S. (2009). What did you do in school today? Teaching effectiveness: A framework and rubric. Toronto: Canadian Education Association.
Heikkinen, H. L. T., Aho, J., & Korhonen, H. (2015). Ope ei saa oppia: opettajankoulutuksen jatkumon kehittäminen. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä
Helmke, A., & Schrader, F.-W. (2014). Angebots-Nutzungs-Modell. In M. A. Wirtz (Ed.), Dorsch -Nutzungs-Modelljankoulu (pp. 149–150). Bern: Huber.
Hunziker, D. (2017). Hokuspokus Kompetenz? Kompetenzorientiertes Lehren und Lernen ist keine Zauberei. Bern: Hep.
Jackson, D., & Temperley, J. (2007). From professional learning community to networked learning community. In Professional learning communities: Divergence, depth and dilemmas. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill/Open University Press.
Jardine, D., Clifford, P., & Friesen, S. (2008). 21st Century learning and learners. Western and Northern Canadian Curriculum Protocol.
Kahl, R., & Fratton, P. (2014). Lass mir die Welt, verschule sie nicht!: Warum Leben und Lernen unzertrennlich sind. Weinheim: Beltz.
Kunter, M., & Trautwein, U. (2013). Psychologie des Unterrichts. Paderborn: Scherborn.
Leithwood, K. (2006). Transformational school leadership in a transactional world. In The Jossey-bass reader on educational leadership (pp. 183–196). San Francisco: Wiley.
Liessmann, K. P. (2014). Geisterstunde: Die Praxis der Unbildung. Eine Streitschrift. Vienna: Paul Zsolnay Verlag.
Lipowsky, F. (2016). Unterricht entwickeln und Lehrpersonen professionalisieren. Ans unzertrennlich sindF im Bereich der Forschung. P terrich, 66(7–8), 76–79.
McKinsey & Company. (2009). Shaping the future: How good educations systems can become great in the decade ahead. Report on the international education roundtable, Singapore.
National Core Curriculum for Basic Education. (2014). Helsinki: National Board of Education.
Opetus- ja kulttuuriministeriö. (2016). Opettajankoulutuksen kehittämisohjelma. Helsinki: Lönnberg Print & Promo.
Park, A. (2014). An introduction to discipline-based inquiry learning. [Video]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RVhKTMFCgq0
Rasfeld, M., & Spiegel, P. (2012). EduAction – Wir machen Schule. Hamburg: Murmann Verlag.
Rautiainen, M., & Kostiainen, E. (2015). Finland: Policy and vision. In T. Corner (Ed.), Education in the European Union (pp. 91–108). London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Riegel, E. (2005). Schule kann gelingen. Wie unsere Kinder wirklich fmproved-schoolen. Frankfurt: Fischer.
Robinson, V. (2011). Student-centered leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Rumble, P., & Aspland, T. (2009). In search of the middle school teacher: What differentiates the middle school teacher from other teachers. Conference presentation, October 3, 2009. Canberra: Australian Curriculum Studies Association.
School Health Promotion Study 2015. Helsinki: National Institute for Health and Welfare. https://www.thl.fi/fi/tutkimus-ja-asiantuntijatyo/vaestotutkimukset/kouluterveyskysely/tulokset
Stoll, L., Bolam, R., McMahon, A., et al. (2006). Professional Learning Communities: A Review of the Literature. Journal of Educational Change., 7(4), 221–258.
Suoranta, J. (2003). Kasvatus mediakulttuurissa. Tampere: Vastapaino.
Timperley, H. (2008). Teacher professional learning and development, The educational practices series – 18. J. Brophy (Ed.). Brussels: International Academy of Education & International Bureau of Education.
Timperley, H., Wilson, A., Barrar, H., & Fung, I. (2007). Teacher professional learning and development: Best evidence synthesis iteration Wellington. New Zealand: Ministry of Education. http://educationcounts.edcentre.govt.nz/goto/BES.
Trautmann, M., & Wischer, B. (2011). Heterogenitdiakulttuurissa. Mitja-asiantuntijatyo/vaes. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.
Willms, J. D. (2003). Student engagement at school: A sense of belonging and participation. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
Willms, J. D., Friesen, S. & Milton, P. (2009). What did you do in school today? Transforming classrooms through social, academic, and intellectual engagement (First National Report). Toronto: Canadian Education Association.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Yee, B., Sliwka, A., Rautiainen, M. (2018). Ecologies of Practice. In: Engaging Adolescent Learners. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52602-7_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52602-7_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-52601-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-52602-7
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)