Skip to main content

The Presidential Debates 2016

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The 2016 US Presidential Campaign

Part of the book series: Political Campaigning and Communication ((PCC))

  • 1673 Accesses

Abstract

Ben Voth examines the 2016 presidential debates. He begins by noting the rhetorical significance of the 2016 debates and identifies four essential ingredients of a debate. In reviewing the presidential primary debates, Voth explains why 2016 was a blockbuster year with so many initial candidates among the Republicans and a surprisingly tough contest for the Democrats between Clinton and Sanders. Voth addresses the unprecedented role and impact of the media on the debates. Trump received overwhelmingly more negative press than Clinton and the moderators became active participants during the debates. Voth concludes with considerations of why Trump’s vulgarity and offensive arguments worked and five lessons from the debates that will influence the 2020 presidential debates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Mitchell McKinney, “Debating Democracy: The History and Effects of the U.S. Presidential Debates,” Spectra, 48 (3), September 2012.

  2. 2.

    Robert V. Friedenberg, Rhetorical Studies of National Political Debates, 1960–1992, 2nd edition, (Santa Barbara, Praeger, 1993).

  3. 3.

    Brian Stelter, “Convention ratings: Democrats beat Republicans, and cable tops broadcast,” CNN Money, July 27, 2016, http://money.cnn.com/2016/07/27/media/democratic-convention-night-two-ratings/.

  4. 4.

    “Historical TV Ratings For Presidential Debates 1960–2008 Presidential Campaigns,” http://uspolitics.about.com/od/elections/l/bl_historical_tv_ratings_prez_debates.htm.

  5. 5.

    Lydia Saad, “Presidential Debates Rarely Game-Changers But have moved voter preferences in several elections,” Gallup, September 25, 2008. http://www.gallup.com/poll/110674/Presidential-Debates-Rarely-GameChangers.aspx.

  6. 6.

    Mitchell McKinney and Ben Warner, “Do Presidential Debates Matter? Examining a Decade of Campaign Debate Effects,” Argumentation and Advocacy 49, Spring 2013, 245–6.

  7. 7.

    Chris Cizilla, “The Thirteen Most Amazing Findings in the Exit Polls,” The Washington Post, November 10, 2016, https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/11/10/the-13-most-amazing-things-in-the-2016-exit-poll/?utm_term=.01b23d4e2bee.

  8. 8.

    Leigh Holmwood, “Sarah Palin helps Saturday Night Live to best ratings in 14 years,” The Guardian, October 20, 2008.

  9. 9.

    Gabriel Debenedetti, “Disappointing debate ratings spark Democratic campaign complaints: The DNC comes under fire for Saturday’s low viewership figures,” Politico. November 15, 2015, http://www.politico.com/story/2015/11/democratic-debates-cbs-clinton-sanders-omalley-215909.

  10. 10.

    Gabriel Debenedetti, “Disappointing debate ratings spark Democratic campaign complaints: The DNC comes under fire for Saturday’s low viewership figures,” Politico. November 15, 2015, http://www.politico.com/story/2015/11/democratic-debates-cbs-clinton-sanders-omalley-215909.

  11. 11.

    Thomas E. Patterson, Research: Media Coverage of the 2016 Election. Shorenstein Center, Harvard University, September 7, 2016. https://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/.

  12. 12.

    Theodore White, The Making of the President, 1972, New York: Bantam Books, 1973.

  13. 13.

    “Confidence in Institutions,” Gallup, 2016. http://www.gallup.com/poll/1597/confidence-institutions.aspx.

  14. 14.

    Art Swift, “Americans Trust Mass Media Sinks to New Low,” Gallup, September 14, 2016, http://www.gallup.com/poll/195542/americans-trust-mass-media-sinks-new-low.aspx.

  15. 15.

    Art Swift, “Americans Trust Mass Media Sinks to New Low,” Gallup, September 14, 2016, http://www.gallup.com/poll/195542/americans-trust-mass-media-sinks-new-low.aspx.

  16. 16.

    Jim Kuyper, Partisan Journalism: A History of Media bias in America, (Lanham, Maryland: Rowman and Littlefield, 2014).

  17. 17.

    Chris Cilliza, “Just 7 Percent of Journalists are Republicans. That’s Far Fewer than even a Decade Ago,” The Washington Post, May 6, 2014, http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2014/05/06/just-7-percent-of-journalists-are-republicans-thats-far-less-than-even-a-decade-ago/.

  18. 18.

    Ernest Bormann, “Fantasy and Rhetorical Vision: The Rhetorical Criticism of Social Reality,” Quarterly Journal of Speech, 58, (1972): 396–407.

  19. 19.

    Thomas E. Patterson, Research: Media Coverage of the 2016 Election. Shorenstein Center, Harvard University, September 7, 2016. https://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/.

  20. 20.

    “Alan Keyes Barred from Presidential Debate and “Kidnapped” by Atlanta Police—1996,” YouTube, 2015, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SehAtMQPNmQ.

  21. 21.

    Michael Calvin McGee, “The “ideograph”: A link between rhetoric and ideology.” Quarterly Journal of Speech, 66, (1980): 1–16.

  22. 22.

    Thomas E. Patterson, Research: Media Coverage of the 2016 Election. Shorenstein Center, Harvard University, September 7, 2016, https://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/.

  23. 23.

    Thomas E. Patterson, Research: Media Coverage of the 2016 Election. Shorenstein Center, Harvard University, September 7, 2016, https://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/.

  24. 24.

    Thomas E. Patterson, Research: Media Coverage of the 2016 Election. Shorenstein Center, Harvard University, September 7, 2016, https://shorensteincenter.org/news-coverage-2016-general-election/.

  25. 25.

    Hadas Gold, “Brazile under siege after giving Clinton debate question,” Politico, October 31, 2016, http://www.politico.com/story/2016/10/donna-brazile-wikileaks-fallout-230553; Glenn Kesler, “Donna Braziles Misleading Statements on Sharing Questions with the Clinton Campaign,” The Washington Post, November 2, 2016, https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2016/11/02/donna-braziles-misleading-statements-on-sharing-questions-with-the-clinton-campaign/.

  26. 26.

    Marisa Schultz, “CNN Drops Brazile for Feeding Debate Questions to Clinton,” The New York Post, October 31, 2016, http://nypost.com/2016/10/31/cnn-drops-brazile-for-feeding-debate-questions-to-clinton/.

  27. 27.

    Ellen Powell, Christian Science Monitor. “Why Google News is adding a ‘Fact Check’ label; While pundits are in disagreement about the role the media should play in vetting politicians’ statements, readers are bringing record traffic to fact-checking websites like Politifact,” October 14, 2016, LEXIS/NEXIS December 30, 2016.

  28. 28.

    Dave Levinthal and Michael Beckel, Center for Public Integrity, “Buying the President 2016: Journalists shower Hillary Clinton with campaign cash/ Far fewer making contributions to Donald Trump, analysis shows,” October 17, 2016, https://www.publicintegrity.org/2016/10/17/20330/journalists-shower-hillary-clinton-campaign-cash.

  29. 29.

    Robert Denton and Benjamin Voth, Social Fragmentation and the Decline of American Democracy: The End of the Social Contract, (Palgrave Macmillan, 2016): 85–112.

  30. 30.

    Molly Moorhead, “Obama: Romney Called Russia Our Top Geopolitical Threat.” Politifact, October 22, 2012, http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2012/oct/22/barack-obama/obama-romney-called-russia-our-top-geopolitical-fo/.

  31. 31.

    David Sanger, December 29, 2016, “Obama Strikes Back at Russia for Election Hacking,” The New York Times, http://www.nytimes.com/2016/12/29/us/politics/russia-election-hacking-sanctions.html?_r=0.

  32. 32.

    Olivia Nuzzi, Donald Trump Brings Five Bill Clinton Accusers to Debate Definitely Not Sorry about Tape,” The Daily Beast, October 9, 2016, http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/10/09/donald-trump-brings-five-bill-clinton-accusers-to-debate-definitely-not-sorry-about-tape.html.

  33. 33.

    Ben Voth, “Ain’t I a Woman: The Political Economy of Sexism and Racism,” American Thinker. October 21, 2016, http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2016/10/aint_i_a_woman_the_political_economy_of_sexism_and_racism.html.

  34. 34.

    Emily Wagster Pettus, “Mississippi church member charged in ‘Vote Trump’ arson,” The Washington Post, December 21, 2016, https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/religion/arrest-in-vote-trump-burning-of-mississippi-black-church/2016/12/21/b3641010-c7bd-11e6-acda-59924caa2450_story.html?utm_term=.1eb77d5c21ed; Jonathan Dienst and Ray Villeda, “Muslim Student Who Said She Was Harassed by Trump Supporters Charged With Filing False Report: Sources,” NBC News New York, December 15, 2016, http://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/local/Missing-Muslim-Student-Baruch-College-Arrested-False-Alert-Trump-Subway-406606865.html.

  35. 35.

    Karthick Ramakrishnan, “Trump Got More Votes from People of Color than Romney Did Here’s the Data,” The Washington Post, November 11, 2016, https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/monkey-cage/wp/2016/11/11/trump-got-more-votes-from-people-of-color-than-romney-did-heres-the-data/?utm_term=.c40775527717.

  36. 36.

    Stephen Toulmin, 1958, The Uses of Argument, Cambridge University Press.

  37. 37.

    Jacob Pramuk, “Trump Spent About Half of What Clinton Did on His Way to the Presidency,” CNBC, November 16, 2016.

  38. 38.

    David E. Weisberg, “Democrats Complained about Citizens United Until the Cash Rolled In,” The Hill, December 4, 2016.

  39. 39.

    Ben Voth, “Blue Privilege,” American Thinker, July 11, 2013, http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2013/07/blue_privilege.html.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ben Voth .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Voth, B. (2017). The Presidential Debates 2016. In: Denton Jr, R. (eds) The 2016 US Presidential Campaign. Political Campaigning and Communication. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52599-0_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics