Advertisement

Enterprise Architecture Context Analysis Proposal

  • Małgorzata Pańkowska
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation book series (LNISO, volume 22)

Abstract

The enterprise architecture (EA) is defined as a coherent and consistent set of principles and rules that guide system design. In the EA modelling methods, an enterprise is identified with institution, business or administrative unit. The EA development methods mostly focus on the EA internal problem visualization, as well as on the procedural and different viewpoint approaches. However, in this paper, author would like to emphasize the EA context specification. The first part of the paper covers presentation of different meanings of context in information science. Next, the discussion on the EA context in related publications is included. The third part comprises a proposal of considering EA stakeholders, principles and other information technology (IT) systems as an EA context. Finally, a short case study is included for the context visualization.

Keywords

Enterprise architecture Context Stakeholder Principle Archimate 

References

  1. 1.
    Zimmermann, A., Lorenz, A., Oppermann, R.: An operational definition of context. In: Kokinov, B., Richardson, D.C., Roth-Berghofer, T.R., Vieu, L. (eds.) Modeling and using context, pp. 558–573. Springer, Berlin (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    ISO/IEC 25063:2014, http://www.iso.org/iso/. Accessed May 2012
  3. 3.
    Ben Mena, T., Bellamine-Ben Saoud, N., Ben Ahmed, M., Pavard, B.: Towards a methodology for context sensitive systems development. In: Kokinov, B., Richardson, D.C., Roth-Berghofer, T.R., Vieu, L. (eds.) Modeling and Using Context, pp. 56–68. Springer, Berlin (2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zachman, J.A.: Frameworks standards: what’s it all about? In: Kappelman, L.A. (ed.) The SIM Guide to Enterprise Architecture, pp. 66–70. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Federal Enterprise Architecture Framework: Version 1.1, September (1999), CIO Council. http://www.cio.gov/documents/fedarch1.pdf. Accessed May 2012
  6. 6.
    Perks, C., Beveridge, T.: Guide to Enterprise IT Architecture. Springer, New York (2003)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Spadoni, M., Abdmouleh, A.: Information systems architecture for business process modelling. In: Saha, P. (ed.) Handbook of Enterprise Systems Architecture in Practice, pp. 366–382. Information Science Reference, Hershey (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lankhorst, M.: Enterprise Architecture at Work. Springer, Berlin (2005)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shron, M.: Thinking with Data, How to Turn Information into Insights. O’Reilly, Beijing (2014)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Martini, A., Aloini, D.: Unpacking exploratory innovation: search practices, organizational context and performance. In: Augsdorfer, P., Bessant, J., Moslein, K., von Stamm, B., Piller, F. (eds.) Discontinuous Innovation, pp. 105–139. Imperial College Press, London (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Anthopoulos, L.G., Tougountzoglou, T.E.: Viability model for digital cities: economic and acceptability factors. In: Reddick, Ch., Aikins, S.K. (eds.) Web 2.0 Technologies and Democratic Governance, pp. 79–98. Springer, New York (2012)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Duffy, D.: Domain Architecture, Models and Architectures for UML Applications. Wiley, Chichester (2004)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tarantino, A.: Manager’s Guide to Compliance, Sarbanes-Oxley, COSO, ERM, COBIT, IFRS, BASEL II, OMB A-123, ASX 10, OECD Principles, Turnbull Guidance, Best Practices and Case Studies. Wiley, Hoboken (2006)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Callon, M., Latour, B.: Unscrewing the big leviathan: how actors macro-structure reality and how sociologists help them to do so. In: Knorr-Cetina, K.D., Cicourel, A.V. (eds.) Advances in Social Theory and Methodology: Towards an Integration of Micro and Macro-Sociologies, pp. 203–277. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London (1981)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mitra, T.: Practical Software Architecture, Moving from System Context to Deployment. IBM Press, Old Tappan (2016)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hervas, R., Nava, S.W., Fontech, J., Casero, G., Laguna, J., Bravo, J.: Exploring context semantics for proactive cooperative visualization. In: Luo, Y. (ed.) Cooperative Design Visualization and Engineering, pp. 52–55. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg (2009)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wasson, Ch.: System Analysis. Design and Development, Hoboken (2006)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Stair, R., Reynolds, G.: Principles of Information Systems, Course Technology. Cengage Learning, Walldorf (2010)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kazem Haki, M., Legner, Ch.: New avenues for theoretical contributions in enterprise architecture principles—a literature review. In: Aier, S., Ekstedt, M., Matthes, F., Proper, E., Sanz, J.L. (eds.) Trends in Enterprise Architecture, Research and Practice Driven Research on Enterprise Transformation, pp. 182–197. Springer, Berlin (2012)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Greefhorst, D., Proper, E.: Architecture Principles, The Cornerstones of Enterprise Architecture. Springer, Berlin (2011)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Op’t Land, M., Proper, E., Waage, M., Cloo, J., Steghuis, C.: Enterprise Architecture, Creating Value by Informed Governance. Springer, Berlin (2009)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    COBIT 5. A Business Framework for the Governance and Management of Enterprise IT, An ISACA Framework. ISACA, Rolling Meadows (2012)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sandkuhl, K., Simon, D., Wisotzki, M., Starke, Ch.: The nature and a process for development of enterprise architecture principles. In: Abramowicz, W. (ed.) Business Information Systems, pp. 260–272. Springer, Heidelberg (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    McDonald, K.J.: Beyond Requirements, Analysis with the Agile Mindset. Addison Wesley, New York (2016)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ahlemann, F., Legner, Ch., Schafczuk, D.: Introduction. In: Ahlemann, F., Stettiner, E., Messerschmidt, M., Legner, Ch. (eds.) Strategic enterprise architecture management, pp. 1–33. Springer, Berlin (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Economics in KatowiceKatowicePoland

Personalised recommendations