Advertisement

Sustainability Reporting in Latvia: Management Views

  • Dzineta DimanteEmail author
  • Agnese Alksne
Chapter
Part of the MIR Series in International Business book series (MIRSIB)

Abstract

Sustainability reporting in Latvia is a comparatively recent development. In spite of a growing number of companies undertaking different social responsibility activities, only few of them report this. Mostly, companies choose to communicate their sustainability activities through their web page. Mainly large companies with considerable environmental and social impact and listed joint-stock companies, which are required to do so by stock exchange regulation, undertake efforts to communicate their responsibility activities.

Both the lack of resources and stock exchange activity and a lack of interest from civil society explain why so few companies in Latvia invest in sustainability reporting, even if they pursue sustainability practices. Society’s awareness of corporate sustainability issues is raised by different public events, e.g., the annual CSR conference and Responsible Business Week, the national competition Sustainability Index, and others.

The aim of this research is to understand the attitude of the management of Latvian enterprises toward sustainability issues to better explain the low level of activity in sustainability reporting. The results of the study show that approximately half of the respondents consider sustainability issues important for their business, but only around 40% of the respondents’ companies have developed CSR strategies. The main sustainability activities concern employee work conditions, job satisfaction, and relations with the clients, and sustainability reporting is frequently considered a tool for enhancing the company’s image. The increasing attention to sustainability issues in business education and NGO’s activities suggest that sustainability actions and reporting will be pursued by more companies in Latvia.

Keywords

Corporate Social Responsibility Corporate Governance Global Reporting Initiative Corporate Sustainability Sustainability Issue 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Aguilera, R. V., Williams, C. A., Conley, J. M., & Rupp, D. E. (2006). Corporate governance and social responsibility: A comparative analysis of the UK and the US. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 14(3), 147–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alksne, A., Alijosiute, A., & Esop, K. (2015). Comparing state of CSR in Baltics and Finland by CSR Latvia, CSR Lithuania—LAVA, CSR Estonia. Accessed September 5, 2016, from http://ksalatvija.lv/lv/jaunumi/petijums-latvijas-uznemumiem-var-rasties-sarezgijumi-dalibai-starptautiskajas-piegades-kedes
  3. Baltaca, B., Strautmanis, J., & Atstaja, D. (2016). Social responsibility education in Latvia. In D. Turker et al. (Eds.), Social responsibility education across Europe: A comparative approach (pp. 71–90). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Directive 2014/95/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22. (2014, October). Retrieved August 12, 2016, from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:32014L0095&from=EN
  5. Employers’ Confederation of Latvia. (2014). Corporate social responsibility memorandum (in Latvian). Accessed September 20, 2016, from http://www.lddk.lv/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/memorands-par-ksa-principiem-latvij_2010.pdf
  6. Institute of Corporate Sustainability and Responsibility. (2015). Resursi. Accessed September 27, 2016, from http://incsr.eu/lv/resursi/parskati/ (in Latvian)
  7. Law on Governance of Capital Shares of a Public Person and Capital Companies. (2016). Accessed August 30, 2016, from http://www.vvc.gov.lv/export/sites/default/docs/LRTA/Likumi/Governance_of_Capital_Shares_of_a_Public_Person_and_Capital_Companies.pdf
  8. Lielgaidina, L., Berzina, L., & Geipele, I. (2012). Corporate social responsibility and mass media: Latvian case. Economics and Management, 17(1), 335–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lozano, R. (2015). A holistic perspective on corporate sustainability drivers. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 22, 32–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lursoft Data Bases. (2016). Accessed September 27, 2016, from https://www.lursoft.lv/lursoft_statistika/?&id=197
  11. NASDAQ OMX. (2016). Accessed September 27, 2016, from http://www.nasdaqbaltic.com/market/?pg=mainlist&lang=en
  12. Rodriguez-Fernandez, M. (2016). Social responsibility and financial performance: The role of good corporate governance. Business Research Quarterly, 19, 137–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Sauka, A. (2012). Corporate Social Responsibility of Latvian Companies (in Latvian). Technical report. Accessed August, 29, 2016, from http://www.nordea.lv/sitemod/upload/root/www.nordea.lv%20-%20lv/PB/Nordea_vitametrs.pdf

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of LatviaRigaLatvia

Personalised recommendations