Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics ((SAPERE,volume 36))

  • 639 Accesses

Abstract

One of the limitations of rational design as a model of good design is that it omits moral considerations. Recall Dieter Rams’s view that good design is aimed at making the world more humane. This criterion is not about how optimal a design is in the achievement of its function but rather about the quality of that function itself. The question is: Is the world that a design helps to bring about a good world? The concept of the social contract is relevant to addressing this question. A social contract is, typically, a body of rights that people observe so that they may thrive through collaboration and cooperation. Through cooperation, people may become better off than they would be by simply acting individually on their own behalf. On this view, the question of good design comes down to a matter of how well designs respect people’s rights within some applicable social contract. Social contracts are often reflected in legal codes, such as safety regulations, that spell out how designs are expected to perform.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Livingston (2007), p. 170.

  2. 2.

    Alphabet (2015).

  3. 3.

    Selinger (2014).

  4. 4.

    Selinger (2014).

  5. 5.

    Selinger (2014).

  6. 6.

    Horn (1995).

  7. 7.

    Churchill (2008), p. 574.

  8. 8.

    Locke (1689/1988).

  9. 9.

    Cf. Xie (2014).

  10. 10.

    The City of San Francisco, where the service was launched in the United States, deemed it illegal and ordered it to cease operations (Maddaus 2014).

  11. 11.

    The Economist (2014).

  12. 12.

    The Economist (2016).

  13. 13.

    Patterson (2012).

  14. 14.

    Hewitt (nd).

  15. 15.

    The Economist (2012).

  16. 16.

    Steele and Hermiston (2015).

  17. 17.

    Johnson and Goldstein (2003).

  18. 18.

    Singh (2015).

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cameron Shelley .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Shelley, C. (2017). Social Contract. In: Design and Society: Social Issues in Technological Design. Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics, vol 36. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52515-0_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52515-0_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-52514-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-52515-0

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics