Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Using System Dynamics for Agile Cloud Systems Simulation Modelling

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Strategic Engineering for Cloud Computing and Big Data Analytics

  • 1087 Accesses

Abstract

Cloud Systems Simulation Modelling (CSSM) combines three different topic areas in software engineering , apparent in its constituting keywords: cloud system , simulation and modelling. Literally, it involves the simulation of various units of a cloud system—functioning as a holistic body. CSSM addresses various drawbacks of physical modelling of cloud systems, such as time of setup, cost of setup and expertise required. Simulation of cloud systems to explore potential cloud system options for ‘smarter’ managerial and technical decision-making help to significantly eradicate waste of resources that would otherwise be required for physically exploring cloud system behaviours. This chapter provides an in-depth overview of System Dynamics, the most widely adopted implementation of CSSM. This chapter provides an in-depth background to CSSM and its applicability in cloud software engineering—providing a case for the apt suitability of System Dynamics in investigating cloud software projects. It discusses the components of System Dynamic models in CSSM, data sources for effectively calibrating System Dynamic models, role of empirical studies in System Dynamics for CSSM, and the various methods of assessing the credibility of System Dynamic models in CSSM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Forrester, J. W. (1961). Industrial dynamics. Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Harrell, C., Ghosh, B., & Bowden, R. (2004). Simulation using Promodel with CD-ROM (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill Science/Engineering/Math.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zeigler, B. P. (2000). Theory of modeling and simulation (2nd ed.). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Shull, F., Singer, J., & Sjøberg, D. I. K. (2007). Guide to advanced empirical software engineering (2008th ed.). London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jedlitschka, A., Ciolkowski, M., & Pfahl, D. (2008). reporting experiments in software engineering. In F. Shull, J. Singer & D. I. K. Sjøberg (Eds.), Guide to advanced empirical software engineering (pp. 201–228). London: Springer. Retrieved September 8, 2014, from http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-84800-044-5_8.

  6. Wohlin, C., Runeson, P., Höst, M., Ohlsson, M.C., Regnell, B., & Wesslén, A. (2012) Operation. In Experimentation in software engineering (pp. 117–122). Berlin: Springer. Retrieved September 7, 2014, from http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-29044-2_9.

  7. Weiss, D. M. (1984). Evaluating software development by error analysis: The data from the architecture research facility. The Journal of Systems and Software, 1, 57–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Law, A. M. (2006). Simulation modeling and analysis (4th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Akerele, O., Ramachandran, M., & Dixon, M. (2013). Testing in the cloud: Strategies, risks and benefits. In Z. Mahmood & S. Saeed (Eds.), Software engineering frameworks for the cloud computing paradigm (pp. 165–185)., Computer communications and networks London: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Abdel-Hamid, T. (1984). The dynamics of software project staffing: An integrative system dynamics perspective, Ph.D. dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Madachy, R. J. (2008). Software process dynamics (1st ed.). Piscataway, NJ, Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-IEEE Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang, H. (2012) Simulation modeling of evolving software processes. In 2012 International Conference on Software and System Process (ICSSP) (pp. 228–230).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Akerele, O., Ramachandran, M., & Dixon, M. (2014a). Investigating the practical impact of agile practices on the quality of software projects in continuous delivery. International Journal of Software Engineering (IJSSE), 7(2), 3–38.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Munch, J., & Armbrust, O. (2003). Using empirical knowledge from replicated experiments for software process simulation: A practical example. In 2003 International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering, 2003. ISESE 2003. Proceedings (pp. 18–27).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Akerele, O., Ramachandran, M., & Dixon, M. (2014). Evaluating the impact of critical factors in agile continuous delivery process: A system dynamics approach, (IJACSA). International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 5(3), 2014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Korn, G. A. (2007). Advanced dynamic-system simulation: Model-replication techniques and Monte Carlo simulation (1st ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Interscience.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Kellner, M. I., Madachy, R. J., & Raffo, D. M. (1999). Software process simulation modeling: Why? What? How? Journal of Systems and Software, 46(2–3), 91–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Abdel-Hamid, T., & Madnick, S. (1991). Software project dynamics: An integrated approach (1st ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fowler, M., Beck, K., Brant, J., Opdyke, W., & Roberts, D. (1999). Refactoring: Improving the design of existing code (1st edn.). Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Humble, J., & Farley, D. (2010). Continuous delivery: Reliable software releases through build, test, and deployment automation. Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sterman, J. (2000). Business dynamics: Systems thinking and modeling for a complex world with CD-ROM (p. 192). Boston, Mass, London: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hammond, A., & Jeffrey, S. (2011). Five ways to streamline release management. Forrester Research Inc. Retrieved June 12, 2014, from http://www.serena.com/docs/repository/solutions/Forrester-Five_Ways_to_Streamline_Release_Management-from_Serena_Software.pdf.

  23. Glaiel, F., Moulton, A., Manick, S. (2013). Agile dynamics: A system dynamics investigation of agile software development methods. Working Papers, Composite Information Systems Laboratory (CISL) Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Oorschot, K. E. (2009). Dynamics of agile software development. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference of the System Dynamics, July 26–30, Massachusetts, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Cohn, M. (2009). Succeeding with agile: Software development using scrum (1st ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hughes, B., & Cotterell, M. (2005). Software project management (4th ed.). London: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Perry, D. E., Porter, A. A., & Votta, L. G. (2000). Empirical studies of software engineering: A roadmap. In Proceedings of the Conference on the Future of Software Engineering, ICSE’00 (pp. 345–355). New York, NY, USA: ACM. Retrieved August 15, 2014, from http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/336512.336586.

  28. Kong, X., Liu, L., & Chen, J. (2011). Modeling agile software maintenance process using analytical theory of project investment. Procedia Engineering, 24, 138–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Blanchard, B. S. (2008). System engineering management (4th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Forrester, J. W. (2013). Industrial dynamics. Martino Fine Books.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Daellenbach, H. G. (1994). Systems and decision making: A management science approach. Chichester. Madachy, R. J. (2008). Software process dynamics (1st ed.). Hoboken, NJ ; Piscataway, NJ: Wiley-IEEE Press; Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Armbrust, O. (2003). Using empirical knowledge for software process simulation: A practical example. Retrieved June 12, 2014 from, http://ove-armbrust.de/downloads/Armbrust-da.pdf.

  33. Sterman, J. (2000). Business dynamics: Systems thinking and modeling for a complex world with CD-ROM (p. 192). Boston, Mass; London: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Akerele, O., & Ramachandran, M. (2014b). Continuous delivery in the cloud: An economic evaluation using system dynamics. In M. Ramachandran (Ed.), Advances in cloud computing research. Hauppauge, New York: Nova Science Pub Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Akerele, O., Ramachandran, M., & Dixon, M. (2013a). System dynamics modeling of agile continuous delivery process. In Agile Conference (AGILE), 2013 (pp. 60–63).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Coyle, G. (2000). Qualitative and quantitative modelling in system dynamics: Some research questions. System Dynamics Review, 16(3), 225–244.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  37. Münch, J. (2012). Software process definition and management (2012th ed.). Heidelberg: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  38. Richardson, G. P. (1991). System dynamics: Simulation for policy analysis from a feedback perspective. In P. A. Fishwick & P. A. Luker (Eds.), Qualitative simulation modeling and analysis. Advances in simulation (pp. 144–169). New York: Springer. Retrieved August 18, 2014, from http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4613-9072-5_7.

  39. Tvedt, J., & Collofello, J. (1995). Evaluating the effectiveness of process improvements on software development cycle time via system dynamics modeling, Ph.D. thesis, University of Arizona.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Lane, D. C. (1998). Can we have confidence in generic structures? The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 49(9), 936.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. Box, G. E. P., & Draper. (1987). Empirical model-building and response surfaces (1st edn.). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Forrester, J. W. (1994). System dynamics, systems thinking, and soft OR. System Dynamics Review, 10(2–3), 245–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Sargent, R. G. (1998). Verification and validation of simulation models. In Proceedings of the 30th Conference on Winter Simulation. WSC’98, Los Alamitos, CA, USA (pp. 121–130). IEEE Computer Society Press. Retrieved September 11, 2014, from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=293172.293216.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Parexel International, Nottingham, UK

    Olumide Akerele

Authors
  1. Olumide Akerele
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olumide Akerele .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. School of Computing, Creative Technologies and Engineering, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, United Kingdom

    Amin Hosseinian-Far

  2. School of Computing, Creative Technologies and Engineering, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, United Kingdom

    Muthu Ramachandran

  3. School of Computing, Creative Technologies and Engineering, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, United Kingdom

    Dilshad Sarwar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Akerele, O. (2017). Using System Dynamics for Agile Cloud Systems Simulation Modelling. In: Hosseinian-Far, A., Ramachandran, M., Sarwar, D. (eds) Strategic Engineering for Cloud Computing and Big Data Analytics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52491-7_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52491-7_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-52490-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-52491-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation