Skip to main content

Reactions to Darwin’s Origin of Species

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 752 Accesses

Part of the book series: Religion, Spirituality and Health: A Social Scientific Approach ((RELSPHE,volume 1))

Abstract

The chapter describes the initial reaction of the British general public to the 1859 publication of Charles Darwin’s Origin of Species, the immediate and later reactions of the scientific community, and the 20th Century response of Conservative Christians in the U.S. The British public had a generally favorable reaction to Origin of Species when it was first published, and it has been said that the British public widely accepted that the theory of evolution was true within a decade of the book’s publication. As the chapter explains, Darwin’s “theory of descent with modification” was widely accepted among scientists in Britain and the U.S. by the 1870s, but many biologists were not convinced that Darwin’s “theory of Natural Selection” was the mechanism of evolution until the early 20th Century, when the field of genetics showed that individual characteristics were expressed through and transmitted by genes and that random mutations in genes could produce significant changes in genetic characteristics upon which Natural Selection could act. The chapter also describes that most Christian denominations came to accept the theory of evolution, but strong objections to the theory arose among Conservative Christians in America in the early 1920s. Their objection to the concept of evolution, which is predicated on their literal interpretation of the description of God’s creation of the world in the Book of Genesis, has been expressed in educational movements in the U.S. that oppose the teaching of evolution in the public schools, including “Creation Science” and “Intelligent Design.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The first amendment to the U.S. Constitution begins with the following clause, which has come to be known as the “Establishment Clause”: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.” The U.S. Supreme Court has interpreted this clause to mean than no government entity in the U.S. should promote or hinder the practice of religion, and that allowing the expression of religious beliefs and practices in public schools constitutes the promotion of religion by the government. Banning the teaching of evolution in public schools because it is contrary to the story of creation in the “Book of Genesis” thereby constitutes the promotion of religion by the government. The first ten amendments to the U.S. Constitution are called, collectively, the “Bill of Rights.”

References

  1. Colp, R., Jr. (1986). The relationship of Charles Darwin to the ideas of his grandfather, Dr. Erasmus Darwin. Biography, 9(1), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Larson, E. J. (2004). Evolution: The remarkable history of a scientific theory. New York: The Modern Library.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fleming, C., & Goodall, J. (2002). Dangerous Darwinism. Public Understanding of Science, 11, 259–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Francis, K. A. (2007). Charles Darwin and the origin of species. Westport: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Singer, C. (1950). A history of biology (Revised ed..). New York: Henry Schuman.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bowler, P. J. (2004). The specter of Darwinism: The popular image of Darwinism in early twentieth century Britain. In A. Lustig, R. J. Richards, & M. Ruse (Eds.), Darwinian heresies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Huxley, T. H. (1880). The coming of age of “The origin of species.” Science, 1(2), 15–17., 20.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Waller, J. (2005). Evolution’s inside man: Other people could have had Darwin’s insights, but no one else could have gotten them accepted by the establishment. New Scientist, 187(2513), 42–44.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pennock, R. T. (2003). Creationism and intelligent design. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics, 4(1), 143–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dixon, T. (2009). America’s difficulty with Darwin. History Today, 59(2), 22–28.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bailey, D. H. (2010). Creationism and intelligent design: Scientific and theological difficulties. Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought, 43(3), 62–87.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Brown, S. (2014). The evolution of creationism. Church and State, 67(3), 9–12.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wald, D. (2000). Special section on intelligent design: The new creationism. Skeptic, 8(2), 12.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Melott, A. L. (2002). Intelligent design is creationism in a cheap tuxedo. Physics Today, 55(6), 48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Blancke, S., Hjermitslev, H. H., Braeckman, J., & Kjaergaard, P. C. (2013). Creationism in Europe: Facts, gaps, and prospects. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 81(4), 996–1028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Coyne, J. A. (2012). Science, religion, and society: The problem of evolution in America. Evolution, 66(8), 2654–2663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Masci, D., & Lipka, M. (2009). Fighting of Darwin, state by state. Washington, DC.: Pew Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Winchester, A. M. (1966). Genetics: A survey of the principles of heredity (3rd ed.). New York: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Olby, R. C. (1966). Origins of Medelsim. New York: Schocken Books.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mendel, G. (1866/1996). Experiments on plant hybridization (W. Bateson, Trans.). Electronic scholarly publishing project. In Mendel Retrieved from http://www.esp.org/foundations/genetics/classical/gm-65.pdf

  21. Dobzhansky, T. (1937). Genetics and the origin of species. New York: Columbia Univsersity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mayr, E. (2002). What is evolution. London: Phoenix.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Mayr, E. (1991). One long argument: Charles Darwin and the genius of modern evolutionary thought. Cambridge, MA: Hazen University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Gould, S. J., & Eldredge, N. (1977). Punctuated equilibria: The tempo and mode of evolution reconsidered. Paleobiology, 3(2), 115–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Simpson, G. G. (1944/1984). Tempo and mode in evolution. New York Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Flannelly, K.J. (2017). Reactions to Darwin’s Origin of Species . In: Religious Beliefs, Evolutionary Psychiatry, and Mental Health in America. Religion, Spirituality and Health: A Social Scientific Approach, vol 1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52488-7_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52488-7_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-52487-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-52488-7

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics