Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Religion, Spirituality and Health: A Social Scientific Approach ((RELSPHE,volume 1))

Abstract

The chapter reviews research findings on the degree to which religion faith, including religious beliefs, are associated with death anxiety (i.e., fear of death and the unknown after death). The research shows that Americans who practice their faith as an end in itself (internal religious motivation) have less fear of death than those who view religion as a means to achieve social goals (external religious motivation), and that the salutary association between internal religiosity and fear of death is mediated by the fact that individuals who have internalized their religious faith are more likely to believe in life-after-death. The findings of numerous, relatively small U.S. studies, which primarily surveyed Christians, indicate that belief in life-after-death tends to be negatively associated with death anxiety/fear of death. The results of four large-scale studies that specifically examined the positive and negative association of other religious beliefs with death anxiety also are described. However, research indicates that people have various fears about death, some of which are not affected by their belief in an afterlife and some of which seem to be affected more by other aspects of religious faith.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The studies were grouped into tables by whether they reported a statistically significant inverse (or negative) association, a statistically significant direct (or positive negative) association, or no statistically significant association between religious motivation and death anxiety. The term “statistically significant” means that the observed result is very unlikely to have occurred by chance.

  2. 2.

    The term “significant” is often used as shorthand for “statistically significant.”

  3. 3.

    Two studies were excluded because they did not report bivariate correlations and the third study was excluded because it was conducted in Hong Kong.

  4. 4.

    Correlation is a statistical procedure that measures the degree of association between two numerical variables. A positive correlation means that when one variable increases in magnitude the other variable also increases in magnitude. A negative correlation means that when one variable increases the other variable decreases. Pearson’s correlation coefficient is the most commonly used correlation measure; its coefficient is symbolized as r. A positive correlation coefficient ranges between 0 and 1; a negative correlation coefficient ranges between 0 and −1.

  5. 5.

    I took a closer look at the U.S. samples to see if the differences in the findings might be attributable to differences in the samples or other features of the study. Based on their differences in methodology, four general factors might have accounted for the different results: the dependent variables, the independent variables, the sample size, and the sample composition with respect to religion. Statistical analyses of these four factors found no evidence that any of them affected the proportion of studies reporting significant correlations, or the direction or size of the correlations.

  6. 6.

    The first three studies used probability (i.e., randomly selected) samples. The sample sizes of the first two studies were N = 1211 and N = 1154 (N is the number of persons in a sample from a population.).

  7. 7.

    The first two studies analyzed the data with Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) regression; the demographic variables in both studies were age, education, gender, and race. Regression is a statistical procedure that measures the degree of association of one numerical variable with one or more other numerical variables.

  8. 8.

    The belief that one collaborates with God was measured with three items:“I rely on God to help me control my life”; “I can succeed with God’s help”; and “All things are possible when I work together with God.”

  9. 9.

    Beta (β) is a measure of association that is very similar to Pearson’s r, and it is identical to r when there are only two variables in an OLS regression analysis.

  10. 10.

    The data came from the 2013–2014 “Landmark Spirituality and Health Survey,” which was conducted by the National Opinion Research Center (NORC). The sample size for this study was 2783. The NORC also conducts the biennial “General Social Survey.”

  11. 11.

    Religious hope was measured by three items: “My religious or spiritual beliefs help me see that things will turn out well in the future”; “My religious or spiritual beliefs help me see that the future will bring opportunities for a better life”; and “My religious or spiritual beliefs help me see that the future looks bright for me.”

  12. 12.

    The third and fourth studies analyzed their data using structural equation modeling (SEM), which combines OLS regression with factor analysis. The third study controlled for the same variables controlled in the first and second studies.

  13. 13.

    N = 634; The study used OLS regression, controlling for age, gender, and multiple measures of religion. Religious doubt was measured with a 15-item scale, which included items about questioning the existence of God, wondering why God allows suffering and evil to exist in the world, dissatisfaction with clergy and church leaders, and the disparate viewpoints of the world offered by science and religion.

  14. 14.

    This is different from the measure of association in correlation (e.g., Pearson’s r) and the measure of association in OLS regression (β), in which values closer to 1 represent stronger associations and values farther away from 1 represent weaker associations.

References

  1. Becker, E. (1973). The denial of death. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Heidegger, M. (1949). Existence and being. Chicago: Henry Regnery Co.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Stolorow, R. D. (1973). Perspectives on death anxiety: A review. Psychiatric Quarterly, 47(4), 473–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Malinowski, B. (1954). Magic, science and religion. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Oates, W. E. (1973). The psychology of religion. Waco, TX: Word Books.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jung, C. (1934/1969). The soul and death. In The collected works of C. G. Jung (Vol. 8). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rosenblatt, A., Greenberg, J., Solomon, S., Pyszczynski, T., & Lyon, D. (1989). Evidence for terror management theory: I. The effects of mortality salience on reactions to those who violate or uphold cultural values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 57(4), 681–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, T., Solomon, S., Rosenblatt, A., Veeder, M., Kirkland, S., et al. (1990). Evidence for terror management theory II: The effects of mortality salience on reactions to those who threaten or bolster the cultural worldview. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 58(2), 308–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Solomon, S., Greenberg, J., & Pyszczynski, T. (1991). A terror-management theory of self-esteem. In C. R. Snyder, & D. Forsyth (Eds.), Handbook of social and clinical psychology: The health perspective (pp. 21–40). New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Vail, K. E., 3rd, Rothschild, Z. K., Weise, D. R., Solomon, S., Pyszczynski, T., & Greenberg, J. (2010). A terror management analysis of the psychological functions of religion. Personality and Social Psychology Review , 14(1), 84–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jonas, E., & Fischer, P. (2006). Terror management and religion: Evidence that intrinsic religiousness mitigates worldview defense following mortality salience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 91(3), 553–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Templer, D. I., & Dotson, E. (1970). Religious correlates of death anxiety. Psychological Reports , 26, 895–897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Neimeyer, R. A., Wittkowski, J., & Moser, R. P. (2004). Psychological research on death attitudes: An overview and evaluation. Death Studies , 28(4), 309–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fortner, B. V., & Neimeyer, R. A. (1999). Death anxiety in older adults: A quantitative review. Death Studies , 23(5), 387–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wink, P., & Scott, J. (2005 ). Does religiousness buffer against the fear of death and dying in late adulthood? Findings from a longitudinal study. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences , 60B(4), P207-P214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Koenig, H. G. (1988). Religious behaviors and death anxiety in later life. Hospice Journal, 4(1), 3–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ellis, L., & Wahab, E. (2013). Religiosity and fear of death: A theory-oriented review of the empirical literature. Review of Religious Research , 55(1), 149–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Allport, G. W. (1962). Prejudice: Is it societal or personal? Journal of Social Issues , 18(2), 120–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Allport, G. W. (1966). Religious context of prejudice. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion , 5(3), 447–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Allport, G. W., & Ross, J. M. (1967). Personal religious orientation and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 5(4), 432–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Feagin, J. R. (1964). Prejudice and religious types: A focused study of southern fundamentalists. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion , 4(1), 3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Falkenhain, M., & Handal, P. J. (2003). Religion, death attitudes, and belief in afterlife in the elderly: Untangling the relationships. Journal of Religion and Health , 42(1), 67–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Spilka, B., Stout, L., Minton, B., & Sizemore, D. (1977). Death and personal faith: A psychometric investigation. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion , 16(2), 169–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Cohen, A. B., Pierce, J. D., Jr., Chambers, J., Meade, R., Gorvine, B. J., & Koenig, H. G. (2005). Intrinsic and extrinsic religiosity, belief in the afterlife, death anxiety, and life satisfaction in young Catholics and Protestants. Journal of Research in Personality , 39(3), 307–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Krause, N. (2005). God-mediated control and psychological well-being in late life. Research on Aging , 27(2), 136–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Krause, N. (2015). Trust in God, forgiveness by God, and death anxiety. Omega – Journal of Death and Dying , 72(1), 20–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Krause, N., Pargament, K. I., & Ironson, G. (2016). In the shadow of death: Religious hope as a moderator of the effects of age on death anxiety. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, Retrieved from http://psychsocgerontology.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2016/04/10/geronb.gbw039.long

  28. Henrie, J., & Patrick, J. H. (2014). Religiousness, religious doubt, and death anxiety. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development , 78(3), 203–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hoelter, J. W. (1979). Multidimensional treatment of fear of death. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology , 47(5), 996–999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hoelter, J. W., & Epley, R. J. (1979). Religious correlates of fear of death. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion , 18(4), 404–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Silton, N. R., Flannelly, K. J., Ellison, C. G., Galek, K., Jacobs, M. R., Marcum, J. P., et al. (2011). The association between religious beliefs and practices and end-of-life fears among members of the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A). Review of Religious Research , 53, 357–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Arndt, J., Routledge, C., Cox, C. R., & Goldenberg, J. L. (2005). The worm at the core: A terror management perspective on the roots of psychological dysfunction. Applied and Preventive Psychology , 11(3), 191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Flannelly, K.J. (2017). Religion and Death Anxiety. In: Religious Beliefs, Evolutionary Psychiatry, and Mental Health in America. Religion, Spirituality and Health: A Social Scientific Approach, vol 1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52488-7_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52488-7_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-52487-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-52488-7

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics