Abstract
The dominant concept in the moral philosophy of the past three centuries in Western countries has been the pursuit of happiness. The main interpretation of this concept, which found complete expression in neo-liberalism , is the conception of John Locke, according to whom the pursuit of happiness can be obtained in particular through private initiative, i.e. the private use of land and natural resources. This is at the root of some of the moral dilemmas facing us today, which come from what we could call the “individualist turn” of neo-liberalism. This tendency is translated at the level of government/institutions in the individualised promotion of health rather than in structural actions to prevent disease; in the at times uncritical spread of predictive medicine (including genetic tests); in the privatisation of water; and even in the patentability of genes and parts of the body.
Another philosophical issue—related to liberal thinking—that is relevant to health and particularly to primary prevention is the interference of the State with individual choices, which is contemptuously defined “the role of the nanny-State ”. Stuart Mill coined the “harm principle ”; i.e. as a general rule a government cannot exercise coercion on the individual to protect her from herself. The only purpose for which power can be exercised on any member of a civilised community, against her will, is to prevent harm to others. The debate around the nanny-State has become hot in recent years after the implementation of public health measures, e.g. in New York. This chapter discusses critically the concept of “freedom of choice ”, which is often at odds with public health promotion. Also, following the teaching of a contemporary American philosopher, Michael Sandel, we have to reflect whether by entrusting the potential of biomedical technologies only to market forces we want to aim more for the individual skill of adaptation and self-promotion or reinforce everyone, including the less fortunate.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Bibliography
Conly, S. (2013). Against autonomy: Justifying coercive paternalism. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Ebrahim, S., & Smith, G. D. (2001). Exporting failure? Coronary heart disease and stroke in developing countries. International Journal of Epidemiology, 30(2), 201–205.
Hawkes, C., et al. (2009). Globalisation, trade and the nutrition transition. In R. Labonté et al. (Eds.), Globalisation and health: Pathways, evidence and policy. New York: Routledge.
Judt, T. (2011). Ill fares the land. London: Penguin Books.
Kevles, D. J. (2013, March 7). Can they patent your genes? New York Review of Books.
Magnusson, R. (2014). Bloomberg, Hitchens, and the libertarian critique. Hastings Center Report, 44(1), 3–4.
Marmot, M., et al. (2012). WHO European review of social determinants of health and the health divide. Lancet, 380(9846), 1011–1029.
Rothman, K. J., Adami, H. O., & Trichopoulos, D. (1998). Should the mission of epidemiology include the eradication of poverty? Lancet, 352(9130), 810–813.
Sandel, M. (2005). Public philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Sandel, M. (2010). Justice. London: Penguin Books.
Sandel, M. (2012). What money can’t buy: The moral limits of markets. London: Penguin Books.
Sanderson, S. C., et al. (2009). Responses to online GSTM1 genetic test results among smokers related to patients with lung cancer: A pilot study. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention, 18(7), 1953–1961.
Sunstein, C. R. (2013, March 7). It’s for your own good! New York Review of Books.
Vineis, P., Ahsan, H., & Parker, M. (2005). Genetic screening and occupational and environmental exposures. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 62(9), 657–662, 597.
Vineis, P., & Christiani, D. C. (2004). Genetic testing for sale. Epidemiology, 15(1), 3–5.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Vineis, P. (2017). Public Health as a Common Good. In: Health Without Borders. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52446-7_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52446-7_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-52445-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-52446-7
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)