Abstract
Human development is driven by an individual’s genetics. Alterations in genetic information may lead to abnormal growth and development, including abnormalities affecting reproductive potential. This chapter reviews several genetic disorders associated with gonadal dysfunction and their corresponding fertility preservation and restoration options. Special considerations are noted regarding genetic risk to future offspring and family members. Conditions highlighted in this chapter include ataxia-telangiectasia, fragile X-associated primary ovarian insufficiency, galactosemia, GAPO syndrome, and 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (aka DiGeorge syndrome).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Chun H, Gatti R. Ataxia-telangiectasia, an evolving phenotype. DNA Repair. 2004;3(8-9):1187–96.
Swift M et al. The incidence and gene frequency of ataxia-telangiectasia in the United States. Am J Hum Genet. 1986;39:573–83.
Biton S, Barzilai A, Shiloh Y. The neurological phenotype of ataxia-telangiectasia: solving a persistent puzzle. DNA Repair (Amst). 2008;7(7):1028–38.
Perlman S, Becker-Catania S, Gatti R. Ataxia telangiectasia: a diagnosis and treatment. Semin Pediatr Neurol. 2003;10(3):173–82.
Swift M et al. Malignant neoplasms in the families of patients with ataxia-telangiectasia. Cancer Res. 1976;36(1):209–15.
Morrell D, Chase C, Swift M. Cancers in 44 families with ataxia-telangiectasia. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 1990;50:119–23.
Athma P, Rappaport R, Swift M. Molecular genotyping shows that ataxia-telangiectasia heterozygotes are predisposed to breast cancer. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 1996;92:130–4.
Easton D. Cancer risks in A-T heterozygotes. Int J Radiat Biol. 1994;66:S177–82.
FitzGerald M et al. Heterozygous ATM mutations do not contribute to early onset breast cancer. Nat Genet. 1997;15:307–10.
Broeks A et al. ATM-heterozygous germline mutations contribute to breast cancer-susceptibility. Am J Hum Genet. 2000;66:494–500.
Renwick A et al. ATM mutations that cause ataxia-telangiectasia are breast cancer susceptibility alleles. Nat Genet. 2006;38:873–5.
Jones K. Smith’s recognizable patters of human malformation. 6th ed. Philadelpia: Elsevier Saunders; 2006.
Zadik Z et al. Gonadal dysfunction in patients with ataxia telangiectasia. Acta Paediatr Scand. 1978;67(4):477–9.
Crawford D, Acuna J, Sherman S. FMR1 and the fragile X syndrome: human genome epidemiology review. Genet Med. 2001;3:359–71.
Crawford D et al. Prevalence of the fragile X syndrome in African-Americans. Am J Med Genet. 2002;110:226–33.
Strom C et al. Molecular testing for Fragile X Syndrome: lessons learned from 119,232 tests performed in a clinical laboratory. Genet Med. 2007;9:46–51.
Sullivan S, Welt C, Sherman S. FMR1 and the continuum of primary ovarian insufficiency. Semin Reprod Med. 2011;29:299–307.
Monaghan KG et al. ACMG Standards and Guidelines for fragile X testing: a revision to the disease-specific supplements to the Standards and Guidelines for Clinical Genetics Laboratories of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. Genet Med. 2013;15(7):575–86.
Nolin S et al. Expansion of the fragile X CGG repeat in females with premutation or intermediate alleles. Am J Hum Genet. 2003;72(2):454–64.
Fernandez-Carvajal I et al. Expansion of an FMR1 grey-zone allele to a full mutation in two generations. J Mol Diagn. 2009;11(4):306–10.
Yrigollen C et al. AGG interruptions within the maternal FMR1 gene reduce the risk of offspring with fragile X syndrome. Genet Med. 2012;14(8):729–36.
American College of Obstetrics and Gynecologists. Carrier screening for fragile X syndrome. Committee opinion No. 469. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116:1008–10.
Pastore L, Morris W, Karns L. Emotional reaction to fragile X premuation carrier tests among infertile women. J Genet Couns. 2008;17(1):84–91.
Hagerman P, Hagerman R. The fragile-X premutation: a maturing perspective. Am J Hum Genet. 2004;74(5):805–16.
Sullivan A et al. Association of FMR1 repeat size with ovarian dysfunction. Hum Reprod. 2005;20(2):402–12.
Ennis S, Ward D, Murray A. Nonlinear association between CGG repeat number and age of menopause in FMR1 premutation carriers. Eur J Hum Genet. 2006;14:153–5.
De Caro J, Dominguez C, Sherman S. Reproductive health of adolescent girls who carry the FMR1 premutation: expected phenotype based on current knowledge of fragile X-associated primary ovarian insufficiency. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008;1135:99–111.
Nelson LM, Covington SN, Rebar RW. An update: spontaneous premature ovarian failure is not an early menopause. Fertil Steril. 2005;83(5):1327–32.
Sherman S, Pletcher B, Driscoll D. Fragile X syndrome: diagnostic and carrier testing. Genet Med. 2005;7(8):584–7.
Coss K et al. Classical Galactosaemia in Ireland: incidence, complications and outcomes of treatment. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2012;36:21–7.
Berry G, Elsas L. Introduction to the Maastricht workshop: lessons from the past and new directions in galactosemia. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2011;34:249–55.
van Erven B et al. Fertility preservation in female classic galactosemia patients. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2013;8:107.
Fridovich-Keil J et al. Ovarian function in girls and women with GALT-deficiency galactosemia. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2011;34:357–66.
Levy H. Reproductive effects of maternal metabolic disorders: implications for pediatrics and obstetrics. Turk J Pediatr. 1996;38:335–44.
Levy H et al. Ovarian failure in galactosemia. N Engl J Med. 1984;310:50.
Rubio-Gozalbo M et al. Gonadal function in male and female patients with classic galactosemia. Hum Reprod Update. 2010;16:177–88.
Morrow R et al. Ovarian failure in a young woman with galactosaemia. Ulster Med J. 1985;54:218–20.
Robinson A et al. Hypergonadotrophic hypogonadism in classical galactosemia: evidence for defective oogenesis Case report. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1984;91:199–200.
Sauer M et al. Pregnancy after oocyte donation to a woman with ovarian failure and classical galactosemia. Fertil Steril. 1991;55:1197–9.
Gubbels C et al. Primary ovarian insufficiency in classic galactosemia: role of FSH dysfunction and timing of the lesion. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2013;36:29–34.
Gubbels C, Land J, Rubio-Gozalbo M. Fertility and impact of pregnancies on the mother and child in classic galactosemia. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2008;63:334–43.
Tipton RE, Gorlin RJ. Growth retardation, alopecia, pseudo-anodontia, and optic atrophy--the GAPO syndrome: report of a patient and review of the literature. Am J Med Genet. 1984;19(2):209–16.
Stranecky V et al. Mutations in ANTXR1 cause GAPO syndrome. Am J Hum Genet. 2013;92(5):792–9.
Bayram Y et al. Whole exome sequencing identifies three novel mutations in ANTXR1 in families with GAPO syndrome. Am J Med Genet A. 2014;164A(9):2328–34.
Benetti-Pinto CL et al. GAPO syndrome: a new syndromic cause of premature ovarian insufficiency. Climacteric. 2016;19:1–5.
Cancrini C et al. Clinical features and follow-up in patients with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. J Pediatr. 2014;164(6):1475–80. e2
Grassi MS et al. Congenital Heart Disease as a Warning Sign for the Diagnosis of the 22q11.2 Deletion. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2014;103(5):382–90.
Perez E, Sullivan KE. Chromosome 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (DiGeorge and velocardiofacial syndromes). Curr Opin Pediatr. 2002;14(6):678–83.
Shaikh TH et al. Chromosome 22-specific low copy repeats and the 22q11.2 deletion syndrome: genomic organization and deletion endpoint analysis. Hum Mol Genet. 2000;9(4):489–501.
Yagi H et al. Role of TBX1 in human del22q11.2 syndrome. Lancet. 2003;362(9393):1366–73.
Driscoll DA. Prenatal diagnosis of the 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. Genet Med. 2001;3(1):14–8.
Noel AC et al. Fetal phenotype associated with the 22q11 deletion. Am J Med Genet A. 2014;164A(11):2724–31.
Peters D et al. Noninvasive prenatal diagnosis of a fetal microdeletion syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(19):1847–8.
Srinivasan A et al. Noninvasive detection of fetal subchromosome abnormalities via deep sequencing of maternal plasma. Am J Hum Genet. 2013;92(2):167–76.
Lau TK et al. Secondary findings from non-invasive prenatal testing for common fetal aneuploidies by whole genome sequencing as a clinical service. Prenat Diagn. 2013;33(6):602–8.
Fernandez L et al. Comparative study of three diagnostic approaches (FISH, STRs and MLPA) in 30 patients with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. Clin Genet. 2005;68(4):373–8.
Morcel K et al. Utero-vaginal aplasia (Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome) associated with deletions in known DiGeorge or DiGeorge-like loci. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2011;6:9.
Markert ML et al. Review of 54 patients with complete DiGeorge anomaly enrolled in protocols for thymus transplantation: outcome of 44 consecutive transplants. Blood. 2007;109(10):4539–47.
McDonald-McGinn DM, Zackai EH. Genetic counseling for the 22q11.2 deletion. Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2008;14(1):69–74.
Iwarsson E et al. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis of DiGeorge syndrome. Mol Hum Reprod. 1998;4(9):871–5.
Shefi S et al. Fish based preimplantation genetic diagnosis to prevent DiGeorge syndrome. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2009;26(7):411–3.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Goetsch, A.L., Kimelman, D., Woodruff, T.K. (2017). Genetic Disorders Associated with Gonadal Dysfunction. In: Fertility Preservation and Restoration for Patients with Complex Medical Conditions. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52316-3_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52316-3_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-52315-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-52316-3
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)