Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Energy ((LNEN,volume 38))

Abstract

This chapter shows that Africa and Latin America have substantial proven reserves of natural gas, and quite homogeneously located in both regions. Natural gas is playing an increasingly prominent role in the development of electricity generation systems, as it is versatile, supports both baseline and peaking power generation demands, provides proven reserve generation capacity that supplements non-dispatchable power (i.e., wind and solar), has lower GHG emissions and uses less water than coal-based generation and has lower capital costs and shorter new plant construction times than nuclear. Unconventional natural gas production is associated with a number of socio-political, environmental and economic issues that limit drilling in some areas globally and that have created local concerns about impacts on water supply, air quality and enhanced methane emissions. Natural gas plays three prominent roles in the development of the future low-carbon energy future in Africa and Latin America: complementing deloyment of renewables by increasing the flexibility of non-dispatchable power systems, reducing emissions by displacing other fossil fuel generation and reducing health concerns related to household biomass burning. Africa consumes much less gas than it produces on a country-by-country basis in part because of limited infrastructure investment. In Latin America, Mexico and most South American countries have considerable natural gas reserves, and the gas pipeline infrastructure is more highly developed with gas being transported between countries and with all countries producing natural gas using it to produce electricity. Then, natural gas can play a key role in the development of the future low-carbon energy future in Africa and Latin America if a mitigation of social and environmental impacts and the extension of the power grid are achieved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. International Energy Agency database (2015). http://data.iea.org/. Accessed 30 Nov 2015

  2. Price GD (2014) Power systems and renewable energy. Design, operation, and system analysis. Power generation collection. Momentum Press. ISBN-13: 978-1-60650-570-0

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jackson RB, Vengosh A, Carey JW, Davies RJ, Darrah TH, O’Sullivan F, Petron G (2014) The environmental costs and benefits of fracking. Annu Rev Environ Resour 39:327–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. US Environmental Protection agency (2016). EPA final report hydraulic fracturing for oil and gas: impacts from the hydraulic fracturing water cycle on drinking water resources in the United States, EPA-600-R16-236 Fa

    Google Scholar 

  5. Energy Information Administration. US Department of Energy. http://www.eia.gov/cfapps/ipdbproject/IEDIndex3.cfm?tid=5&pid=57&aid=6. Accessed 30 Nov 2016

  6. Inman M (2014) The fracking fallacy. Nature 516:28–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. McKinsey (2015) Brighter Africa—McKinsey Report. http://www.mckinsey.com/industries/electric-power-and-natural-gas/our-insights/powering-africa. Accessed 20 Dec 2016

  8. IEA (2015) Key world energy statistics

    Google Scholar 

  9. Malakoff D (2014) The gas surge. Science 344:1464–1467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. U.S. EPA (2016) Hydraulic Fracturing for Oil and Gas: Impacts from the Hydraulic Fracturing Water Cycle on Drinking Water Resources in the United States (Final Report). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, EPA/600/R-16/236F

    Google Scholar 

  11. Frolich CB, Brunt M (2013) Two-year survey of earthquakes and injection/production wells in the Eagle Ford Shale, Texas, prior to the MW4.8 20 October 2011 earthquake. Earth Planet Sci Lett 379:56–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ojijiagwo E, Oduoza CF (2014) The economics of gas flaring in oil and gas processing environments: a case study of electric power station in a developing country. In: FAIM 2014—Proceedings of the 24th international conference on flexible automation and intelligent manufacturing: capturing competitive advantage via advanced manufacturing and enterprise transformation, pp 143–151

    Google Scholar 

  13. Raja AK, Srivastava AP, Dwivedi M (2006) Power plant engineering, New Age International Publishers, Daryaganj. ISBN-10:81-224-2333-7

    Google Scholar 

  14. Usóna S, Kostowski WJ, Stanek W, Gazdab W (2015) Thermoecological cost of electricity, heat and cold generated in a trigeneration module fuelled with selected fossil and renewable fuels. Energy 92:308–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chekir N, Bellagi A (2011) Performance improvement of a butane/octane absorption chiller. Energy 36:6278–6284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim YJ, Kim S, Joshi YK, Fedorov AG, Kohl PA (2014) Thermodynamic analysis of an absorption refrigeration system with ionic-liquid/refrigerant mixture as a working fluid. Energy 44:1005–1016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Farshi LG, Mahmoudi SMS, Rosen MA (2013) Exergoeconomic comparison of double effect and combined ejector-double effect absorption refrigeration systems. Appl Energy 103:700–711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Liua M, Zhanga N (2007) Proposal and analysis of a novel ammonia–water cycle for power and refrigeration cogeneration. Energy 32:961–970

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. IEA (2014) Energy technology perspectives

    Google Scholar 

  20. Antonanzas J, Alia-Martinez M, Martinez-de-Pison FJ, Antonanzas-Torres F (2015) Towards the hybridization of gas-fired power plants: a case study of Algeria. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 51:116–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. IEA (2011) Harnessing variable renewables: a guide to balancing challenge

    Google Scholar 

  22. Overton TW (2014) Quisqueya I & II, San Pedro de Macorís, Dominican republic. Power 158:9

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ogunlowo OO, Bristow AL, Sohail M (2015) Developing compressed natural gas as an automotive fuel in Nigeria: lessons from international markets. Energy Policy 76:7–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. IEA (2006) World energy outlook. Chapter 15: energy for cooking in developing countries

    Google Scholar 

  25. IEA (2015) Energy efficiency market report 2015. Market trends and medium-term prospects

    Google Scholar 

  26. Indexmundi. www.indexmundi.com. Accessed 30 Nov 2015

  27. Climatescope (2015) The clean energy country competitiveness index. The Multilateral Investment Fund, UK Department of International Development, Power Africa and Bloomberg New Energy Finance

    Google Scholar 

  28. NREL (2015) The western wind and solar integration study phase 2, Technical report, NREL, Golden, CO, US. www.nrel.gov/docs/fy13osti/55588.pdf. Accessed 30 Nov 2015

  29. Oladokun VO, Asemota OC (2015) Unit cost of electricity in Nigeria: a cost model for captive diesel powered generating system. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 52:35–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. IPCC (2006) Guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/. Accessed 30 Nov 2015

  31. McJeon H et al (2014) Limited impact on decadal-scale climate change from increased use of natural gas. Nature 514:482–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. The Economist (2016) Tunnel vision. Methane leaks. Available 23 July 2016

    Google Scholar 

  33. The Economist (2016) A dirty little secret. Methane leaks. Available 23 July 2016

    Google Scholar 

  34. EIA. US Department of Energy. http://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/index.cfm?page=natural_gas_home. Accessed 30 Nov 2015

  35. Farhani S, Shahbaz M, Arouri M, Teulond F (2014) The role of natural gas consumption and trade in Tunisia’s output. Energy Policy 66:677–684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. D’alessandro AA, Izurieta EM, Tonelli SM (2016) Decision-making tools for a LNG regasification plant siting. J Loss Prev Process Ind 43:255–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ricardo Guerrero-Lemus .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Guerrero-Lemus, R., Shephard, L.E. (2017). Natural Gas. In: Low-Carbon Energy in Africa and Latin America. Lecture Notes in Energy, vol 38. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52311-8_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52311-8_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-52309-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-52311-8

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics