Abstract
The chemical industry is one of the safest industries, but its safety record in the eyes of the public has suffered. Perhaps this is because sometimes when there is an accident in a chemical plant it is spectacular and receives a great deal of attention. The public often associates the chemical industry with environmental and safety problems, which results in a negative image of the industry.
Process safety is important because good process safety performance, the lack of major process safety incidents, allows a company the freedom to manage its business without the interference of government regulators, litigation, and adverse public opinion. By avoiding injuries to people, major property loss, and business interruption loss, process safety results in the creation of positive business value for a company. The actions that are required to manage process safety well are the same actions required to manage business well.
Occupational Safety Versus Process Safety
It is important to differentiate between occupational safety which involves accident prevention through work systems which are aimed at minimizing the risk of injury to workers and process safety which involves the prevention and mitigation of fires, explosions, and accidental chemical releases that can have far-reaching impacts. Occupational safety focuses on the prevention of worker injuries and occupational illness, primarily relating to trips, slips, falls, cuts, burns etc. These injuries result from the failures in the control of traditional work procedures. Process safety focuses on the prevention of leaks, spills, process upsets, toxic releases, and equipment failures which may or may not injure or result in fatalities to workers or others at or near the site. This chapter deals primarily with process safety.
Process Safety Technology Issues
The Internet provides considerable information on incidents, good industry practice, and design guidelines. The best practices in industry are briefly discussed in this chapter. Details are readily available from resources listed in the references section at the end of the chapter. Hazards from combustion and runaway reactions play a leading role in many chemical process accidents. Knowledge of these reactions is essential for the control of process hazards. Much of the damage and loss of life in chemical accidents are caused by a loss of containment that results in a sudden release of hazardous material at high pressures, which may or may not result in fire; so it is important to understand how loss of containment and sudden pressure releases can occur. Loss of containment can be due, for example, to ruptured high pressure tanks, runaway reactions, flammable vapor clouds, or pressure developed from external fire. Fires can cause severe damage to people and property from thermal radiation. Chemical releases from fires and pressure releases can form toxic clouds that can be dangerous to people over large areas. Static electricity often is a hidden cause of accidents. It is very important to understand the reactive nature of the chemicals involved in a chemical facility.
Process Safety Management Issues
Chemical process safety involves both the technical and the management aspects of the chemical industry, and this chapter addresses both. It is not enough to be aware of how to predict the effect of process hazards and how to design systems to reduce the risks of these hazards. It also is important to consider how chemical process safety can be managed. Technical and management people at all levels in an organization have process safety management responsibility and can contribute to the overall management of safer chemical processing plants.
Loss of containment due to mechanical failure or misoperation is a major cause of chemical process accidents. The publication One hundred largest losses: a thirty year review of property damage losses in the hydrocarbon-chemical industry (M&M Protection Consultants, 12th edn, Riverside Plaza, Chicago, 1998) cites loss of containment as the leading cause of property loss in the chemical process industries.
It has become clear that process safety can be and must be managed as any other part of the business. A process safety management system is focused on preparedness for the prevention and mitigation of catastrophic releases of chemicals or energy from a process associated with a facility. It also includes the response to and restoration from these events. The term process safety management was first recognized on a broad scale in the late 1980s after Bhopal (see case histories). It formed the basis for many of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers’ Center for Chemical Process Safety’s guideline books and eventually led to US regulations (OSHA PSM) in 1992.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
M & M Protection Consultants (1989) One hundred largest losses: a thirty year review of property damage in the hydrocarbon-chemical industry, 12th edn, 222S. Riverside Plaza, Chicago, IL
CCPS (2010) Process safety boot camp (CCPS Training Course). AIChE, New York
CCPS (2008) Guidelines for hazard evaluation procedures. AIChE, New York
CCPS (2007) Guidelines for safe and reliable instrumented protective system. AIChE, New York
Grinwis D (1986) Process Systems Associate; Larsen, Paul, Associate Instrument Engineering Consultant; and Schrock, Luther, Process Consultant, The Dow Chemical Co., Midland, MI and Freeport, TX, personal-communication
Fisher H (1985) Chem Eng Prog: 3
Huff, J. E, “A General Approach to the Sizing of Emergency Pressure Relief Systems,” Reprints of Int. Symp. on Loss Prev. and Safety Promotion in the Process Ind., Heidelberg, Germany, 1977, p. IV 223, DECHEMA, Frankfurt (1977)
Huff JE (1984) Institute of Chemical Engineers Symposium Series, No. 85, p 109
Huff JE (1984) Emergency venting requirements for gassy reactions from closed system tests. Plant Oper Progr 3(1):50–59
Huff JE (1987) The role of pressure relief in reactive chemical safety. In: International symposium on preventing major chemical accidents, Washington, DC (Sponsored by the Center for Chemical Process Safety of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers, The United States Environmental Protection Agency, and the World Bank)
Fauske HK, Leung J (1985) New experimental technique for characterizing runaway chemical reactions. Chem Eng Progr 39
CCPS (2010) Guidelines for process safety metrics. AIChE, New York
CCPS (2007) Guidelines for risk based process safety. AIChE, New York
CCPS (2009) Inherently safer chemical processes, a life cycle approach. AIChE, New York
Zabetakis MG (1965) Flammability characteristics of combustible gases and vapors. In: Bulletin 627, U.S. Dept. of the Interior, Bureau of Mines. Washington, DC
Bodurtha FT (1987) Industrial explosion control course. Center for Professional Advancement, Chicago, IL
Baker WE, Cox PA, Westine PS, Kulesz JJ, Strehlow RA (1983) Explosion hazards and evaluation. Elsevier, New York
Eichel FG (1967) Electrostatics. Chem Eng 154–167
Lees FP (1980) Loss prevention in the process industries. Butterworths, London
Ludwig EE (1977) Applied process design for chemical and petrochemical plants, vol 1, 2nd edn. Gulf Publishing, Houston, TX
TNO (1979) Methods for the calculation of the physical effects of the escape of dangerous materials: liquids and gases. In: The yellow book. Apeldoorn, The Netherlands
Brasie WC (1983) Michigan Division, Process Engineering. The Dow Chemical Co., Midland, MI, personal communication
Kletz T (1985) Cheaper, safer plants or wealth and safety at work. Institution of Chemical Engineers, Rugby, England
Cloud MJ (1990) Fire, the most tolerable third party. Mich Nat Res 18
FPA (1988) Fire safety data. Fire Protection Association, London
Cawse JN, Pesetsky B, Vyn WT (n.d.) The liquid phase decomposition of ethylene oxide. Union Carbide Corporation, Technical Center, North Charleston, WV
Stull DR (1976) Fundamentals of fire and explosion, p 50, Corporate Safety and Loss Dept., The Dow Chemical Co., Midland, MI, American Institute of Chemical Engineers, New York
Kohlbrand (1990) Case history of a deflagration involving an organic solvent/oxygen system below its flash point. In: 24th Annual loss prevention symposium. Sponsored by the American Institute of Chemical Engineers, San Diego, CA
Prugh RW (1988) Quantitative evaluation of BLEVE hazards. In: AICHE loss prevention symposium, Paper No. 74e, AICHE Spring National Meeting, New Orleans, LA
Mackenzie J (1990) Hydrogen peroxide without accidents. Chem Eng 84ff
Bartknecht W (1981) Explosions course prevention protection. Springer, Berlin, p 108
Brasie WC (1982) Michigan Division, Process Engineering, The Dow Chemical Co., Midland, MI, personal communication
NFPA 77 (1986) National Fire Protection Association. Batterymarch Park, Quincy, MA
NFPA 68 (1998) National Fire Protection Association. Batterymarch Park, Quincy, MA
CPQRA (Chemical Process Quantitative Risk Analysis) (1989) Tables 2.12, 2.13, p 161, 165. Center for Chemical Process Safety of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers
Technica, Inc. (1989) HAZOP leaders course, Columbus, OH; course leaders David Slater and Frederick Dyke
Walters S (1984) The beginnings. Mech Eng 4:38–46
Burk, Art. (1990) Principal Safety Consultant. Du Pont, Newark, DE, personal communication
OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration) (1990) U.S. Department of Labor, The Phillips Company Houston Chemical Complex Explosion and Fire
Clancey VJ (1972) Diagnostic features of explosion damage. Sixth International Meeting of Forensic Sciences, Edinburgh
NUS Corp. (1989) HAZOP Study Team Training manual. Predictive hazard identification techniques for Dow Corning facilities, Gaithersburg, MD
AIChE (1988) Guidelines for safe storage and handling of high toxic hazard materials. Center for Chemical Process Safety, American Institute of Chemical Engineers, New York, NY
API RP 521 (1982) 2nd edn, American Petroleum Institute, Washington, DC
CCPS (2009) Guidelines for developing quantitative safety risk criteria. AIChE, New York
Murphy JF, Conner J (2012) Beware of the black swan: the limitations of risk analysis for predicting the extreme impact of rare process safety incidents. Process Saf Prog 31(4)
Murphy JF, Conner J (2014) Black swans, white swans and fifty shades of grey: remembering the lessons learned from catastrophic process safety incidents. Process Saf Prog 33(2)
Murphy JF (2016) Surviving the black swan, strategies for process safety specialist and companies to survive unpredicted catastrophic events. Process Saf Prog 35(1)
CCPS (2003) Guidelines for analyzing and managing the security vulnerabilities of fixed chemical sites, center for chemical process safety. American Institute of Chemical Engineers, New York
CCPS (2011) Guidelines for process safety in bioprocess manufacturing facilities. AIChE, New York
Howard W (1981) Consultant, Monsanto Chemical Company, Personal Communication
CCPS (1993) Guidelines for safe automation of chemical processes. AIChE, New York
Jackson BL (1986) Piping Specialist, The Dow Chemical Co., Midland, MI, personal communication
Technical Management of Chemical Process Safety (1989) Center for Chemical Process Safety, American Institute of Chemical Engineers, New York, NY
Bodurtha FT (1980) Engineering Dept., Du Pont, Industrial Explosion Prevention and Protection. McGraw-Hill, New York
Boundy, RH, Boyer RF (1952) Styrene, American Chemical Society Monograph Series, p 63. Reinhold Publishing Co., New York
Webley P (1990) Director, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Practice School, Midland Station, Midland, MI, personal communication
Moore CV (1967) The design of barricades for hazardous pressure systems. Nucl Eng Des 5:1550–1566
Allen WT (1988) Process engineering. The Dow Chemical Co. Midland, MI, personal communication
Arendt JS, Lorenzo AF, Lorenzo DK (1989) Evaluating process safety in the chemical industry. A Manager’s Guide to Quantitative Risk Assessment, Chemical Manufacturers Association, DC
CCPS (2001) Layer of protection analysis, simplified process risk assessment. AIChE, New York
AIChE (1988) Guidelines for safe storage and handling of highly toxic hazard materials. Center for Chemical Process Safety, American Institute of Chemical Engineers, New York, NY
Additional Reading References
American Petroleum Institute (1995–2000) API Recommended Practice 520, Sizing, Selection, and Installation of Pressure Relieving Devices in Refineries, Part I, Sizing and Selection. American Petroleum Institute
American Society of Mechanical Engineers (2001) 2001 Boiler Pressure Vessel Code, ASME International, Fairfield, NJ
Bartknecht W (1993) Explosions course: prevention, protection. Springer, Berlin
Bretherick L (1995) Handbook of reactive chemical hazards, 5th edn. Butterworths, London
Crowl D, Bollinger R (1997) Inherently safer chemical processes: a life cycle approach. Center for Chemical Process Safety (CCPS). American Institute of Chemical Engineers, New York
DIERS (Design Institute for Emergency Relief Systems). American Institute of Chemical Engineers, New York, NY. http://www.diers.net/
Englund SM (1991) Design and operate plants for inherent safety. Chem Eng Prog 85–91 (Part 1) and 79–86 (Part 2)
Englund SM (1993) Process and design options for inherently safer plants. In: Prevention and control of accidental releases of hazardous gases. Van Nostrand, New York
Englund SM (1997) Chemical process safety. In: Green DW (ed) Perry’s chemical engineers’ handbook, 7th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York
Hendershot D (2000) Smaller is safer—simplifying chemical plant safety. Safe Workplace, National Council on Compensation Insurance, Boca Raton, FL (Hendershot is a senior technical fellow in the Process Hazard Assessment Department of the Rohm and Haas Company, Bristol, PA, and has written extensively on Process Safety)
Hendershot D (1994) Chemistry—the key to inherently safer manufacturing processes. Presented before the Division of Environmental Chemistry, American Chemical Society, Washington, DC
Kletz T (1998) What went wrong? Case histories of process plant disasters. Gulf Publishing Company, Houston, TX (Kletz is well known for his many publications and for bringing the term, “Inherently Safer Plants,” into popular usage)
Kletz T (1998) Process plants. In: A handbook of inherently safer design. Taylor & Francis: Philadelphia
Lees F (1996) Loss prevention in the process industries: hazard identification, assessment, and control. Butterworths, London
Loss Prevention Committee, Safety, Health Division, AIChE (1995) Proceedings of the 29th Annual Loss Prevention Symposium—(Serial)
Publications by National Fire Protection Association (NFPA). 1 Batterymarch Park, Quincy, MA 02269. For a more complete list, see http://www.nfpa.org/Codes/CodesAndStandards.asp
NFPA 30 (2000) Flammable and combustible liquids code
NFPA 69 (1997) Standard on explosion prevention systems
NFPA 68 (1998) Guide for venting of deflagrations
NFPA 325 Guide to fire hazard properties of flammable liquids. PHA Software, “PHAWorks,” PSM Source (reference tool for OSHA’s 1910.119) Primatech Inc., Columbus, OH. http://www.primatech.com
Smith KE, Whittle DK (2001) Six steps to effectively update and revalidate PHAs. Chem Eng Progr 70–77
Thompson Publishing Group (2006) Chemical process safety report. Washington, DC
Internet References and WEB Pages
American Institute of Chemical Engineers. Center for Chemical Process Safety. http://www.aiche.org/ccps/
American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2001 Boiler Pressure Vessel Code. ASME International, Fairfield, NJ. http://www.asme.org /
CCPS (Center for Chemical Process Safety). American Institute of Chemical Engineers, New York. ccps@aiche.org
Chemical Safety Board (Incident Reports). http://www.acusafe.com/Incidents/frame-incident.htm
Manufacturers Chemical Association. http://es.epa.gov/techinfo/facts/cma/cma.html
Manufacturers Chemical Association (Responsible Care). http://es.epa.gov/techinfo/facts/cma/cmacommo.html OSHA Regulations & Compliance Links http://www.osha.gov/comp-links.html
OSHA Regulations (Standards—29 CFR). http://www.osha-slc.gov_OshStd_toc/OSHA_Std_toc.html
RMP Regulations. http://www.epa.gov/swercepp/acc-pre.html. Publications by CCPS (Center for Chemical Process Safety)
American Institute of Chemical Engineers, New York, NY. This is not a complete list. For a complete list, see on the Internet, http://www.aiche.org/pubcat/seadtl.asp?Act=C&Category=Sect4&Min=30
Guidelines for chemical process quantitative risk analysis, 2nd edn, 2000
Guidelines for engineering design for process safety, 2nd edn, 2011
Guidelines for auditing process safety management systems, 2nd edn, 2011
Guidelines for chemical reactivity evaluation and application to process design, 1995
Guidelines for evaluating the characteristics of vapor cloud explosions, flash fires, and BLEVEs, 2nd edn, 2010
Guidelines for investigating chemical process incidents, 2nd edn, 2003
Guidelines for safe storage and handling of reactive materials, 1995
Guidelines for analyzing and managing the security and vulnerability of fixed chemical sites, 2003
Guidelines for initiating events and independent protecton layers, 2015
Incidents that define process safety, 2008
Acknowledgements
The author wishes to acknowledge that earlier versions of this chapter, which appeared in the 11th and preceding editions of the Handbook, were authored by Stan Englund of Midland, Michigan, and that significant content from the previous editions is included herein.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Murphy, J.F. (2017). Safety Considerations in the Chemical Process Industries. In: Kent, J., Bommaraju, T., Barnicki, S. (eds) Handbook of Industrial Chemistry and Biotechnology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52287-6_34
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52287-6_34
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-52285-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-52287-6
eBook Packages: Chemistry and Materials ScienceChemistry and Material Science (R0)