Abstract
Systems researchers often combine methodologies to carry out systemic interventions in a purposeful way. Midgley defines a systemic intervention as “purposeful action by an agent to create change in relation to reflection on boundaries”. It is therefore important when undertaking systemic interventions that researchers and practitioners engage in ‘boundary critique ’. This involves making judgements on inclusion, exclusion and marginalization of stakeholders, and on the issues relating to the intervention. Midgley argues that it is impossible for practitioners involved in systemic interventions to become neutral modelers or facilitators. They suggest that practitioners have to explicitly acknowledge these limitations and manage them while making decisions about system boundaries. Midgley et al. also recommend that a systems approach to an intervention should include exploration of stakeholder values and boundaries for analysis, challenge marginalization and use multi-methodologies. This chapter will explore—providing examples of issues faced during systemic interventions from the literature—how the Indian philosophical concept of karma (right action) could assist the ‘thinking inside the box’ that could assist systems researchers to make boundary judgements while carrying out systemic interventions ‘outside the box’.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Argyris, C., Putnam, R., & Smith, D. (1987). Action science: Concepts, methods, and skills for research and intervention. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Ashokan, M. S. (2015). Karmayogi: A biography of E. Sreedharan. New Delhi: Thomson Press India.
Bandopadhyaya, A. (1964). Scavenger, Bahuroopi Gandhi. G.R. Bhatkal, Popular Prakashan, Bombay Sarvodaya Mandal and Gandhi Research Foundation. http://www.mkgandhi.org/bahurupi/chap06.htm
Bartley, C. (2011). An introduction to Indian philosophy. London: Continuum Books.
Bentham, J. (1776). A fragment on government. http://www.constitution.org/jb/frag_gov.htm
Bronkhorst, J. (2011). Karma. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.
Brown, T. M., & Fee, E. (2008). Spinning for India’s independence. American Journal of Public Health, 98(1), 39.
Burns. (2014). Systemic action research: Changing system dynamics to support sustainable change. Action Research, 12(1), 3–18. doi:10.1177/1476750313513910.
Burns, D., & Worsley, S. (2015). Navigating complexity in international development: Facilitating sustainable change at scale. Warwickshire: Practical Action Publishing.
Churchman, C. W. (1970). Operations research as a profession. Management Science, 17, B37–B53.
Coghlan, D., & Brannick, T. (2014). Doing research in your own organization. London: Sage.
Coghlan, D., & Brydon-Miller, M. (Eds.). (2014). Encyclopaedia of action research (3rd ed.). London: Sage.
Dennett, D. C. (1984). Elbow room: The varieties of free will worth wanting. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Fals-Borda, O. (1987). The application of participatory research in Latin America. International Sociology, 2(4), 329–347.
Flyvbjerg, B. (2014). What you should know about megaprojects and why: An overview. Project Management Journal, 45(2), 6–19.
Gandhi, M. K. (1921). The collected works of Mahatma Gandhi (Electronic Book). Publications Division Government of India [1999, 98 volumes, 23(14), xx–xx].
Gandhi, M. K. (1942). ‘Quit India’ speech. http://www.mkgandhi.org/speeches/qui.htm
Gandhi, M. K. (1957). An autobiography: The story of my experiments with truth (Translated from the original in Gujarati by M. H. Desai). Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
Gandhi, R. (2007). Gandhi: The man, his people and the empire. London: Haus Publishing.
Ganguli K. M. tr. (2008/1883-96). The Mahabharata. New Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers.
Grundy, S. (1982). Three modes of action research. Curriculum Perspectives, 2(3), 23–34.
Grundy, S. (1987). Curriculum: Product or praxis. London: The Falmer Press.
Gupta, A. K., & Ramesh, G. (2010). Project management control system of infrastructure SPVs: DMRC—A case study. In G. Ramesh, V. Nagadevara, G. Naik, & A. B. Suraj (Eds.), Public-private partnerships. New York: Routledge.
Habermas, J. (1972). Knowledge and human interests (2nd ed.). London: Heinemann.
Hall, B. (1997). Looking back, looking forward: Reflections on the origins of the international participatory action research network, in Toronto, Canada. In Chapter presented at the Midwest Research to Practice Conference in Adult Continuing Education, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, October 15–17.
Hooker, B. (2015). Rule consequentialism. Stanford encyclopaedia of philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/consequentialism-rule/
Joshi, D. (2002). Gandhiji on Khadi. Mumbai: Gandhi Book Centre. http://www.mkgandhi.org
Lewin, K. (1948). Action research and minority problems (republished). In G. W. Lewin (Ed.), Resolving social conflicts; Selected chapters on group dynamics (pp. 201–216). New York: Harper & Row.
Majmudar, U. (2014). Mahatma Gandhi and the Bhagavad Gita. American Vedantist. http://americanvedantist.org/2014/articles/mahatma-gandhi-and-the-bhagavad-gita/
Midgley, G. (2000). Systemic intervention: Philosophy, methodology, and practice. New York: Springer.
Midgley, G. (2006). Systemic intervention for public health. American Journal of Public Health, 96(3), 466–472.
Midgley, G., Munlo, I., & Brown, M. (1998). The theory and practice of boundary critique: Developing housing services for older people. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 49(5), 467–478.
Midgley, et al. (2007). Practitioner identity in systemic intervention: Reflections on the promotion of environmental health through Maori community development. Systemic Research and Behavioural Science, 24, 233–247.
Misra, A. (2004). Identity and religion: Foundations of Anti-Islamism In India. New Delhi: Sage.
Pant, M. (2014). Participatory action research. In D. Coghlan & M. Brydon-Miller (Eds.), Encyclopaedia of action research (Vol. 2). London: Sage.
Panter-Brick, S. (2009). Gandhji’s dream of Hindu-Muslim Unity and its two Offshoots in the Middle East. Durham Anthropology Journal, 16, 54–66.
Pfeffer, J., & Sutton, R. I. (2000). The knowing-doing gap: How smart companies turn knowledge into action. Boston, MA: HBS Press.
Radhakrishnan, S. (1929). Indian philosophy (Vol. 1). London: Allen & Unwin.
Rahman, M. A. (2008). Some trends in the praxis of participatory action research. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), The Sage handbook of action research: Participatory inquiry and practice (2nd ed., pp. 49–62). London: Sage.
Ramnath, N. S. (2012). E Sreedharan: More than the metro man. Forbes India Magazine. http://forbesindia.com/article/leaderhip-award-2012/e-sreedharan-more-than-the-metro-man/33847/1
Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (Eds.). (2001). Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry & practice. London: Sage.
Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (2008). Introduction. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of action research (pp. 1–10). London: Sage.
Rudolph, J. (2011). Consequences and limits: A critique of consequentialism. Macalester Journal of Philosophy, 17(1), Article 12. http://digitalcommons.macalester.edu/philo/vol17/iss1/12
Sankaran, S. (2016). Taking action during systems research. In M. Edson, P. Henning & S. Sankaran (Eds.) A guide to systems research—Philosophy, processes and practice. Australia: Springer (forthcoming).
Selener, D. S. (1998). Participatory action research and social change. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Participatory Action Research Network.
Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (2015). Consequentialism. Stanford encyclopaedia of philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/consequentialism/
Ulrich, W. (1996). Primer to critical systems heuristics for action researchers. Hull: Centre for Systems Studies.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sankaran, S., Sankaran, G. (2017). Thinking Inside the Box: Applying the Theory of Karma to Make Boundary Judgements in Systemic Interventions. In: Nandram, S., Bindlish, P. (eds) Managing VUCA Through Integrative Self-Management. Management for Professionals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52231-9_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52231-9_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-52230-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-52231-9
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)