Abstract
Explicit process specifications play an important role in process-aware information systems (PAIS). Whereas methodologies for modeling structured, activity-oriented processes are well established, modeling formalisms for unstructured processes such as case management processes (CMP) are lagging. In this chapter, we define a state-oriented formalism that allows for executable specifications of CMP and paves the road for predictive analysis and recommendations support intended to case managers. This formalism is grounded on statecharts developed by D. Harel in 1987. We adopt the main concepts defined by statecharts and demonstrate how they can be used to specify a case management process. We also propose adaptations and potential extensions of the statecharts formalism that could address CMP specifics and complexity.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.
Source: Préfecture des Hauts-de-Seine: Plan de secours spécialisé sur les inondations Hauts-de-Seine, SIDPC 21/11/2005, (2005), Available at: http://www.ville-neuillysurseine.fr/files/neuilly/mairie/services_techniques/plan-secours-inondation.pdf.
- 9.
- 10.
- 11.
- 12.
Development of modeling and simulation environment for CMP will be addressed in our future work.
- 13.
References
van der Aalst, W.: The application of petri nets to workflow management. J. Circ. Syst. Comput. 8(01), 21–66 (1998)
van der Aalst, W.: Process-aware information systems: lessons to be learned from process mining. In: Jensen, K., van der Aalst, W. (eds.) Transactions on Petri Nets and Other Models of Concurrency II. LNCS, vol. 5460, pp. 1–26. Springer (2009)
van der Aalst, W., Ter Hofstede, A.H.: Yawl: yet another workflow language. Inf. Syst. 30(4), 245–275 (2005)
van der Aalst, W., Weijters, A.: Process mining: a research agenda. Comput. Ind. 53(3), 231–244 (2004)
van der Aalst, W., Pesic, M., Schonenberg, H.: Declarative workflows: balancing between flexibility and support. Comput. Sci. Res. Dev. 23(2), 99–113 (2009)
van der Aalst, W., Weske, M., Grünbauer, D.: Case handling: a new paradigm for business process support. Data Knowl. Eng. 53(2), 129–162 (2005)
Bajec, M., Krisper, M.: A methodology and tool support for managing business rules in organisations. Inf. Syst. 30(6), 423–443 (2005)
Barba, I., Weber, B., Del Valle, C.: Supporting the optimized execution of business processes through recommendations. In: Daniel, F., Barkaoui, K., Dustdar, S. (eds.) Business Process Management Workshops. LNBIP, vol. 99, pp. 135–140. Springer, Berlin (2012)
Bider, I.: Towards a non-workflow theory of business processes. In: La Rosa, M., Soffer, P. (eds.) Business Process Management Workshops. LNBIP, vol. 132, pp. 1–2. Springer, Berlin (2013)
Bubenko, J., Rolland, C., Loucopoulos, P., DeAntonellis, V.: Facilitating fuzzy to formal requirements modelling. In: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Requirements Engineering, 1994, pp. 154–157. IEEE (1994)
Cauvet, C.: Modélisation des processus d’ingénierie des systèmes d’information. Encyclopédie de l’Informatique et des Systèmes d’Information, pp. 1412–1425 (2006)
Davenport, T.: Thinking for a Living: How to Get Better Performances and Results from Knowledge Workers. Harvard Business Press (2005)
Dijkman, R., Dumas, M., Garca-Bauelos, L.: Graph matching algorithms for business process model similarity search. In: Dayal, U., Eder, J., Koehler, J., Reijers, H. (eds.) Business Process Management. LNCS, vol. 5701, pp. 48–63. Springer, Berlin (2009)
Dijkman, R.M., Dumas, M., Ouyang, C.: Semantics and analysis of business process models in BPMN. Inf. Softw. Technol. 50(12), 1281–1294 (2008)
Dowson, M.: Iteration in the software process; review of the 3rd international software process workshop. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Software Engineering, ICSE ’87, pp. 36–41. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA, USA (1987)
Dumas, M., van der Aalst, W.M., Ter Hofstede, A.H.: Process-Aware Information Systems: Bridging People and Software Through Process Technology. Wiley (2005)
Ganter, B., Wille, R., Wille, R.: Formal Concept Analysis, vol. 284. Springer, Berlin (1999)
Groefsema, H., Bucur, D.: A survey of formal business process verification: from soundness to variability. In: Proceedings of International Symposium on Business Modeling and Software Design (BMSD) (2013)
Harel, D.: Statecharts: a visual formalism for complex systems. Sci. Comput. Program. 8(3), 231–274 (1987)
Harel, D., Gery, E.: Executable object modeling with statecharts. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Software Engineering, ICSE ’96, pp. 246–257. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA (1996)
Harel, D., Naamad, A.: The statemate semantics of statecharts. ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 5(4), 293–333 (1996)
Harel, D., Pnueli, A.: On the development of reactive systems. Springer (1985)
Harel, D., Politi, M.: Modeling Reactive Systems with Statecharts: The STATEMATE Approach. McGraw-Hill, Inc. (1998)
Hull, R., Damaggio, E., De Masellis, R., Fournier, F., Gupta, M., Heath, III, F.T., Hobson, S., Linehan, M., Maradugu, S., Nigam, A., Sukaviriya, P.N., Vaculin, R.: Business artifacts with guard-stage-milestone lifecycles: managing artifact interactions with conditions and events. In: Proceedings of the 5th ACM International Conference on Distributed Event-Based System, DEBS ’11, pp. 51–62. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2011)
Kemsley, S.: The changing nature of work: from structured to unstructured, from controlled to social. In: Rinderle-Ma, S., Toumani, F., Wolf, K. (eds.) Business Process Management. LNCS, vol. 6896, pp. 2–2. Springer, Berlin (2011)
Kim, T.T.T., Ruhsam, C., Pucher, M.J., Kobler, M., Mendling, J.: Towards a pattern recognition approach for transferring knowledge in ACM. In: Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference Workshops and Demonstrations (EDOCW), pp. 134–138 (2014)
Kirsch-Pinheiro, M., Rychkova, I.: Dynamic context modeling for agile case management. In: Demey, Y., Panetto, H. (eds.) On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2013 Workshops. LNCS, vol. 8186, pp. 144–154. Springer, Berlin (2013)
Koehler, J., Tirenni, G., Kumaran, S.: From business process model to consistent implementation: a case for formal verification methods. In: Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference, 2002, EDOC ’02. Proceedings, pp. 96–106 (2002)
Koschmider, A., Oberweis, A.: Designing business processes with a recommendation-based editor. In: Brocke, J., Rosemann, M. (eds.) Handbook on Business Process Management 1. International Handbooks on Information Systems, pp. 299–312. Springer, Berlin (2010)
van Lamsweerde, A.: Goal-oriented requirements engineering: a guided tour. In: 2001. Proceedings. Fifth IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering, pp. 249–262 (2001)
Mikk, E., Lakhnech, Y., Petersohn, C., Siegel, M.: On formal semantics of statecharts as supported by statemate. In: Workshop, Ilkleym, vol. 14, p. 15 (1997)
Murata, T.: Petri nets: properties, analysis and applications. Proc. IEEE 77(4), 541–580 (1989)
Nurcan, S., Edme, M.H.: Intention-driven modeling for flexible workflow applications. Softw. Process: Improv. Pract. 10(4), 363–377 (2005)
OMG: Case management process modeling (CMPM) request for proposal. http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?bmi/09-09-23 (2009)
OMG: Business process model and notation (BPMN). http://www.omg.org/spec (2011)
OMG: Case management model and notation. http://www.omg.org/spec/CMMN/1.0/PDF/ (2014). document number formal/2014-05-05
Pesic, M., Schonenberg, H., van der Aalst, W.: Declare: full support for loosely-structured processes. In: Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference, 2007, EDOC 2007. 11th IEEE International, pp. 287–287. IEEE (2007)
Plotkin, G.: A structural approach to operational semantics (1981)
Poelmans, J., Elzinga, P., Viaene, S., Dedene, G.: Formal concept analysis in knowledge discovery: a survey. In: Conceptual Structures: From Information to Intelligence, pp. 139–153. Springer (2010)
Pohl, K., Weidenhaupt, K.: A contextual approach for process-integrated tools. In: Jazayeri, M., Schauer, H. (eds.) Software Engineering ESEC/FSE’97. LNCS, vol. 1301, pp. 176–192. Springer, Berlin (1997)
Pucher, M.: The elements of adaptive case management. In: Mastering the Unpredictable, pp. 89–134 (2010)
Reijers, H.A., Limam, S., Van Der Aalst, W.: Product-based workflow design. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 20(1), 229–262 (2003)
Rolland, C., Prakash, N., Benjamen, A.: A multi-model view of process modelling. Requir. Eng. 4(4), 169–187 (1999)
Rolland, C., Souveyet, C., Moreno, M.: An approach for defining ways-of-working. Information Systems 20(4), 337–359 (1995)
Rosemann, M., van der Aalst, W.: A configurable reference modelling language. Inf. Syst. 32(1), 1–23 (2007)
Rumbaugh, J., Jacobson, I., Booch, G.: Unified Modeling Language Reference Manual, 2nd edn. Pearson Higher Education (2004)
Rychkova, I.: Exploring the alloy operational semantics for case management process modeling. In: 2013 IEEE Seventh International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS), pp. 1–12 (2013)
Rychkova, I., Kirsch-Pinheiro, M., Le Grand, B.: Context-aware agile business process engine: foundations and architecture. In: Nurcan, S., Proper, H., Soffer, P., Krogstie, J., Schmidt, R., Halpin, T., Bider, I. (eds.) Enterprise, Business-Process and Information Systems Modeling. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol. 147, pp. 32–47. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg (2013)
Rychkova, I., Le Grand, B., Kirsch-Pinheiro, M.: Adaptive case management: supporting knowledge intensive processes with it systems. In: Fischer, L. (ed.) Empowering Knowledge Workers. BPM and Workflow Handbook Series. Future Strategies Inc. (2013)
Schonenberg, H., Weber, B., van Dongen, B., van der Aalst, W.: Supporting flexible processes through recommendations based on history. In: Dumas, M., Reichert, M., Shan, M.C. (eds.) Business Process Management. LNCS, vol. 5240, pp. 51–66. Springer, Berlin (2008)
Soffer, P., Yehezkel, T.: A state-based context-aware declarative process model. In: Enterprise, Business-Process and Information Systems Modeling, pp. 148–162. Springer (2011)
Swenson, K.: Mastering The Unpredictable: How Adaptive Case Management Will Revolutionize the Way That Knowledge Workers Get Things Do. Meghan-Kiffer Press (2010)
Swenson, K., Palmer, N., Manuel, A., Carlsen, S.: Empowering Knowledge Workers. BPM and Workflow Handbook Series. Future Strategies Inc. (2013)
Swenson, K., Palmer, N., Pucher, M., Manuel, A., Webster, C.: How Knowledge Workers Get Things Done. Future Strategies Inc. (2012)
Taylor, F.W.: The principles of scientific management. Harper (1914)
Wagner, F., Schmuki, R., Wagner, T., Wolstenholme, P.: Modeling software with finite state machines: a practical approach. CRC Press (2006)
Weske, M.: Business Process Management: Concepts, Languages, 2nd edn. Architectures. Springer, Berlin (2012)
Yu, E.S.: Towards modelling and reasoning support for early-phase requirements engineering. In: Requirements Engineering, 1997., Proceedings of the Third IEEE International Symposium on. pp. 226–235. IEEE (1997)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rychkova, I., Le Grand, B., Souveyet, C. (2017). Towards Executable Specifications for Case Management Processes. In: Grambow, G., Oberhauser, R., Reichert, M. (eds) Advances in Intelligent Process-Aware Information Systems. Intelligent Systems Reference Library, vol 123. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52181-7_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52181-7_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-52179-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-52181-7
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)