Abstract
An essential element of a truly democratic society is the degree of civic engagement it exhibits. The paper draws on the relevant literature to pinpoint the notion, dimensions and determinants of civic engagement and it then moves to explore the issue empirically. In particular, it examines the level and determinants of young people’s civic engagement in Greece, analysing more than 2000 questionnaires which are collected from students of the University of Thessaly. Civic engagement is assessed along three dimensions, civic, electoral and political voice, taking into account whether people actively participate in associations, offer voluntary work to non-governmental organizations, display buttons, signs or stickers, protest, sign petitions and boycott. In addition, the paper explores what drives such a behaviour. After controlling for sociodemographic factors, age, gender, family environment and income, the research finds that sociality (i.e. the intensity of social connections), altruism and political ideology affect students’ civic participation.
[T]he most democratic country in the world now is that in which men have in our time carried to the highest perfection the art of pursuing in common the objects of common desires and have applied this new technique to the greatest number of purposes.
Alexis de Tocqueville (1969, pp. 514)
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
Note that the University is based in Volos (which houses 12 Departments), but it also operates campuses in the cities of Larissa (two Departments), Trikala (one Department), Karditsa (one Department) and Lamia (two Departments).
- 3.
Education of parents was examined instead of personal education since all respondents are university students.
References
Adler, R. P., & Goggin, J. (2005). What do we mean by ‘civic engagement’? Journal of Transformative Education, 3, 236–253.
Albanesi, C., Cicognani, E., & Zani, B. (2007). Sense of community, civic engagement and social well-being in Italian adolescents. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 17, 387–406.
Almond, G. A., & Verba, S. (1963). The civic culture: Political attitudes and democracy in five nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Andolina, M. W., Jenkins, K., Zukin, C., & Keeter, S. (2003). Habits from home, lessons from school: Influences on youth civic engagement. Political Science and Politics, 36, 275–280.
Becker, P. E., & Dhingra, P. H. (2001). Religious involvement and volunteering: Implications for civil society. Sociology of Religion, 62, 315–335.
Benson, L., Harkavy, I., & Puckett, J. (2007). Dewey’s dream: Universities and democracies in an age of education reform. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Berger, B. (2009). Political theory, political science, and the end of civic engagement. Perspectives on Politics, 7, 335–350.
Beyerlein, K., & Vaisey, S. (2013). Individualism revisited: Moral worldviews and civic engagement. Poetics, 41, 384–406.
Bjarnason, S., & Coldstream, P. (Eds.). (2003). The Idea of engagement: Universities in society. London: Association of Commonwealth Universities.
Brady, H. (1999). Political participation. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of political attitudes (pp. 737–801). San Diego: Academic Press.
Brady, H. E., Verba, S., & Schlozman, K. L. (1995). Beyond SES: A resource model of political participation. American Political Science Review, 89, 271–294.
Brooks, A. C. (2006). Who really cares: The surprising truth about compassionate conservatism. New York: Basic Books.
Clarke, J., Huliaras, A., & Sotiropoulos, D. A. (Eds.). (2015). Austerity and the third sector in Greece: Civil society at the European frontline. London: Ashgate.
Dalton, R. (2009). The Good citizen: How a younger generation is reshaping American Politics (Rev. ed.). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
de Tocqueville, A. (1969). In J. P. Mayer (Ed.), Democracy in America. New York: Harper and Row.
Delli Carpini, M. X. (2000). Gen.com: Youth, civic engagement, and the new information environment. Political Communication, 17, 341–349.
Delli Carpini, M. X., & Keeter, S. (1996). What Americans know about politics and why it maters. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Diamond, L. J. (1999). Developing democracy: Toward consolidation. Baltimore, MD: The John Hopkins University Press.
Driskell, R. L., Lyon, L., & Embry, E. (2008). Civic engagement and religious activities: Examining the influence of religious tradition and participation. Sociological Spectrum, 28, 578–601.
Egerton, M. (2002). Higher education and civic engagement. British Journal of Sociology, 53, 603–620.
Ekman, J., & Amna, E. (2012). Political participation and civic engagement: Towards a new typology. Human Affairs, 22, 283–300.
Flanagan, C. (2009). Young people’s civic engagement and political development. In A. Furlong (Ed.), Handbook of youth and young adulthood: New perspectives and agendas (pp. 293–300). Abingdon: Routledge.
Franklin, M. (2004). Voter turnout and the dynamics of electoral competition in established democracies since 1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gil de Zuniga, H., & Valenzuela, S. (2011). The mediating path to a stronger citizenship: Online and offline networks, weak ties, and civic engagement. Communication Research, 38, 397–421.
Gil de Zuniga, H., Veenstra, A., Vraga, E., & Shah, D. (2010). Digital democracy: Reimagining pathways to political participation. Journal of Information Technology and Politics, 7, 36–51.
Hilger, P. (2006). Beyond organized civil society: Definitions and discourses of civic engagement. In H. Katsui & R. G. Wamai (Eds.), Civil dociety reconsidered. A critical look at NGOs in development practice (pp. 8–23). Helsinki: Institute for Development Studies.
Jacoby, B. (Ed.). (2009). Civic Engagement in higher education: Concepts and practices. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Jankowski, R. (2007). Altruism and the decision to vote: Explaining and testing high voter turnout. Rationality and Society, 19, 5–34.
Kalyvas, S. (2015). Modern Greece: What everyone needs to know. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Keeter, S., Zukin, C., Andolina, M., & Jenkins, K. (2002). The civic and political health of the nation: A generational portrait. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement.
Keller, E., & Berry, J. (2003). The influentials. New York: Free Press.
Kelly, D. C. (2006). Parents’ influence on youths’ civic behaviors: The civic context of the caregiving environment. Families in society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 87, 447–455.
Kurtz, J. (2012). Civic engagement of youth in the Middle East and North Africa: An analysis of key drivers and outcomes. Portland, OR: Mercy Corps.
Lake, R., & Huckfeldt, R. (1998). Social vapital, social networks, and political participation. Political Psychology, 19, 567–584.
Lewis, V. A., MacGregor, C. A., & Putnam, R. D. (2013). Religion, networks, and neighborliness: The impact of religious social networks on civic engagement. Social Science Research, 42, 331–346.
McClurg, S. D. (2006). Political disagreement in context: The conditional effect of neighborhood context, disagreement and political talk on electoral participation. Political Behavior, 28, 349–366.
McLellan, J. A., & Youniss, J. (2003). Two systems of youth service: Determinants of voluntary and required youth community service. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 32, 47–58.
Metz, E. C., & Youniss, J. (2005). Longitudinal gains in civic development through school-based required service. Political Psychology, 26, 413–437.
Norris, P. (Ed.). (1999). Critical citizens: Global support for democratic governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Norris, P. (2000). A virtuous circle: Political communications in postindustrial societies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Norris, P. (2002). Democratic phoenix: Reinventing political activism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Norris, P. (2003). Young people and political activism: From the politics of loyalties to the lolitics of choice? Report for the Council of Europe Symposium: Young people and democratic institutions: From disillusionment to participation, Strasbourg, 27–28 November.
Norris, P. (2011). Democratic deficit: Critical citizens revisited. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Oliver, J. E. (2001). Democracy in suburbia. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Pancer, S. M., & Pratt, M. (1999). Social and family determinants of community service involvement in Canadian youth. In M. Yates & J. Youniss (Eds.), Roots of civic identity: International perspectives on community service and activism in youth (pp. 32–55). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Pattie, C., Seyd, P., & Whiteley, P. (2003). Citizenship and civic engagement: Attitudes and behaviour in Britain. Political Studies, 51, 443–468.
Paxton, P. (2002). Social capital and democracy: An interdependent relationship. American Sociological Review, 67, 254–277.
Penner, L. A., & Finkelstein, M. A. (1998). Dispositional and structural determinants of volunteerism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 525–537.
Putnam, R. D. (1995). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6, 65–78.
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Putnam, R. D., Leonardi, R., & Nanetti, R. Y. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Rappaport, J. (1998). The Art of social change. Community narratives as resources for individual and collective identity. In X. B. Arriaga & S. Oscamp (Eds.), Addressing community problems (pp. 225–246). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Reed, P. B., & Selbee, L. K. (2002). Early life experiences and other factors in the social dynamics of civic behavior. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.
Rojas, H. (2008). Strategy versus understanding: How orientations toward political conversation influence political engagement. Communication Research, 35, 452–480.
Rushton, J. P., Chrisjohn, R. D., & Fekken, G. C. (1981). The altruistic personality and the self-report altruism scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 2, 293–302.
Saltmarsh, J., & Zlotkowski, E. (Eds.). (2011). Higher education and democracy: Essays on service-learning and civic engagement. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Sherrod, L. R., Torney-Purta, J., & Flanagan, C. A. (2010). Handbook of research on civic engagement in youth. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Skocpol, T., & Fiorina, M. P. (1999). Making sense of the civic engagement debate. In T. Skocpol & M. P. Fiorina (Eds.), Civic engagement in American democracy (pp. 1–27). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
Sloam, J. (2014). New voice, less equal: The civic and political engagement of young people in the United States and Europe. Comparative Political Studies, 47, 663–688.
Stoker, G. (2006). Why politics matters: Making democracy work. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Teorell, J., Torcal, M., & Montero, J. R. (2007). Political participation: Mapping the terrain. In J. W. van Deth, J. R. Montero, & A. Westholm (Eds.), Citizenship and involvement in European democracies: A comparative analysis (pp. 334–357). London: Routledge.
Torcal, M., & Montero, J. R. (2006). Political disaffection in contemporary democracies: Social capital, institutions and politics. London: Routledge.
Uslaner, E. M. (2003). Civic engagement in America: Why people participate in political and social life. Unpublished paper, available on http://illinois-online.org/krassa/ps410/Readings/Uslaner,%20why%20people%20participate%20in%20social%20life%202013.pdf
Uslaner, E. M., & Brown, M. (2005). Inequality, trust, and civic engagement. American Politics Research, 33, 868–894.
van Biezen, I., Mair, P., & Poguntke, T. (2012). Going, going, ... gone? The decline of party membership in contemporary Europe. European Journal of Political Research, 51, 24–56.
van Gunsteren, H. R. (1998). A theory of citizenship: Organizing plurality in contemporary democracies. Boulder CO: Westview Press.
Verba, S., & Nie, N. H. (1972). Participation in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice, equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Watts, R. J., & Flanagan, C. (2007). Pushing the envelope on youth civic engagement: A developmental and liberation psychology perspective. Journal of Community Psychology, 35, 779–792.
Wilkinson, R. G., & Pickett, K. (2009). The Spirit level: Why more equal societies almost always do better. London: Allen Lane.
Wilson, J., & Musick, M. (1997). Who cares? Toward an integrated theory of volunteer work. American Sociological Review, 62, 694–713.
Winter, N. (2003). Social capital, civic engagement, and positive youth development outcomes. Washington, DC: Edna McConnell Clark Foundation.
Xu, Q. W., Perkins, D. D., & Chow, J. C. C. (2010). Sense of community, neighboring, and social capital as predictors of local political participation in China. American Journal of Community Psychology, 45, 259–271.
Youniss, J., Bales, S., Christmas-Best, V., Diversi, M., Mclaughlin, M., & Silbereisen, R. (2002). Youth civic engagement in the twenty-first century. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 12, 121–148.
Zukin, C., Keeter, S., Andolina, M., Jenkins, K., & Delli Carpini, M. X. (2006). A new engagement? Political participation, civic life, and the changing American citizen. New York: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Arvanitidis, P., Nasioka, F. (2017). Civic Engagement of University Students: An Exploratory Analysis. In: Bitros, G., Kyriazis, N. (eds) Democracy and an Open-Economy World Order. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52168-8_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52168-8_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-52167-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-52168-8
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)