Skip to main content

Civic Engagement of University Students: An Exploratory Analysis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Democracy and an Open-Economy World Order

Abstract

An essential element of a truly democratic society is the degree of civic engagement it exhibits. The paper draws on the relevant literature to pinpoint the notion, dimensions and determinants of civic engagement and it then moves to explore the issue empirically. In particular, it examines the level and determinants of young people’s civic engagement in Greece, analysing more than 2000 questionnaires which are collected from students of the University of Thessaly. Civic engagement is assessed along three dimensions, civic, electoral and political voice, taking into account whether people actively participate in associations, offer voluntary work to non-governmental organizations, display buttons, signs or stickers, protest, sign petitions and boycott. In addition, the paper explores what drives such a behaviour. After controlling for sociodemographic factors, age, gender, family environment and income, the research finds that sociality (i.e. the intensity of social connections), altruism and political ideology affect students’ civic participation.

[T]he most democratic country in the world now is that in which men have in our time carried to the highest perfection the art of pursuing in common the objects of common desires and have applied this new technique to the greatest number of purposes.

Alexis de Tocqueville (1969, pp. 514)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    A compelling and expanding literature discusses why should, and how could, academic institutions increase their connections to civic society (inter alia: Bjarnason and Coldstream 2003; Benson et al. 2007; Jacoby 2009; Saltmarsh and Zlotkowski 2011).

  2. 2.

    Note that the University is based in Volos (which houses 12 Departments), but it also operates campuses in the cities of Larissa (two Departments), Trikala (one Department), Karditsa (one Department) and Lamia (two Departments).

  3. 3.

    Education of parents was examined instead of personal education since all respondents are university students.

References

  • Adler, R. P., & Goggin, J. (2005). What do we mean by ‘civic engagement’? Journal of Transformative Education, 3, 236–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albanesi, C., Cicognani, E., & Zani, B. (2007). Sense of community, civic engagement and social well-being in Italian adolescents. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 17, 387–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almond, G. A., & Verba, S. (1963). The civic culture: Political attitudes and democracy in five nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Andolina, M. W., Jenkins, K., Zukin, C., & Keeter, S. (2003). Habits from home, lessons from school: Influences on youth civic engagement. Political Science and Politics, 36, 275–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, P. E., & Dhingra, P. H. (2001). Religious involvement and volunteering: Implications for civil society. Sociology of Religion, 62, 315–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benson, L., Harkavy, I., & Puckett, J. (2007). Dewey’s dream: Universities and democracies in an age of education reform. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, B. (2009). Political theory, political science, and the end of civic engagement. Perspectives on Politics, 7, 335–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beyerlein, K., & Vaisey, S. (2013). Individualism revisited: Moral worldviews and civic engagement. Poetics, 41, 384–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjarnason, S., & Coldstream, P. (Eds.). (2003). The Idea of engagement: Universities in society. London: Association of Commonwealth Universities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady, H. (1999). Political participation. In J. P. Robinson, P. R. Shaver, & L. S. Wrightsman (Eds.), Measures of political attitudes (pp. 737–801). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady, H. E., Verba, S., & Schlozman, K. L. (1995). Beyond SES: A resource model of political participation. American Political Science Review, 89, 271–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, A. C. (2006). Who really cares: The surprising truth about compassionate conservatism. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, J., Huliaras, A., & Sotiropoulos, D. A. (Eds.). (2015). Austerity and the third sector in Greece: Civil society at the European frontline. London: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, R. (2009). The Good citizen: How a younger generation is reshaping American Politics (Rev. ed.). Washington, DC: CQ Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Tocqueville, A. (1969). In J. P. Mayer (Ed.), Democracy in America. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delli Carpini, M. X. (2000). Gen.com: Youth, civic engagement, and the new information environment. Political Communication, 17, 341–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delli Carpini, M. X., & Keeter, S. (1996). What Americans know about politics and why it maters. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, L. J. (1999). Developing democracy: Toward consolidation. Baltimore, MD: The John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driskell, R. L., Lyon, L., & Embry, E. (2008). Civic engagement and religious activities: Examining the influence of religious tradition and participation. Sociological Spectrum, 28, 578–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egerton, M. (2002). Higher education and civic engagement. British Journal of Sociology, 53, 603–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, J., & Amna, E. (2012). Political participation and civic engagement: Towards a new typology. Human Affairs, 22, 283–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, C. (2009). Young people’s civic engagement and political development. In A. Furlong (Ed.), Handbook of youth and young adulthood: New perspectives and agendas (pp. 293–300). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, M. (2004). Voter turnout and the dynamics of electoral competition in established democracies since 1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gil de Zuniga, H., & Valenzuela, S. (2011). The mediating path to a stronger citizenship: Online and offline networks, weak ties, and civic engagement. Communication Research, 38, 397–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gil de Zuniga, H., Veenstra, A., Vraga, E., & Shah, D. (2010). Digital democracy: Reimagining pathways to political participation. Journal of Information Technology and Politics, 7, 36–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilger, P. (2006). Beyond organized civil society: Definitions and discourses of civic engagement. In H. Katsui & R. G. Wamai (Eds.), Civil dociety reconsidered. A critical look at NGOs in development practice (pp. 8–23). Helsinki: Institute for Development Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, B. (Ed.). (2009). Civic Engagement in higher education: Concepts and practices. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jankowski, R. (2007). Altruism and the decision to vote: Explaining and testing high voter turnout. Rationality and Society, 19, 5–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalyvas, S. (2015). Modern Greece: What everyone needs to know. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeter, S., Zukin, C., Andolina, M., & Jenkins, K. (2002). The civic and political health of the nation: A generational portrait. New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, E., & Berry, J. (2003). The influentials. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, D. C. (2006). Parents’ influence on youths’ civic behaviors: The civic context of the caregiving environment. Families in society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 87, 447–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurtz, J. (2012). Civic engagement of youth in the Middle East and North Africa: An analysis of key drivers and outcomes. Portland, OR: Mercy Corps.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lake, R., & Huckfeldt, R. (1998). Social vapital, social networks, and political participation. Political Psychology, 19, 567–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, V. A., MacGregor, C. A., & Putnam, R. D. (2013). Religion, networks, and neighborliness: The impact of religious social networks on civic engagement. Social Science Research, 42, 331–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClurg, S. D. (2006). Political disagreement in context: The conditional effect of neighborhood context, disagreement and political talk on electoral participation. Political Behavior, 28, 349–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLellan, J. A., & Youniss, J. (2003). Two systems of youth service: Determinants of voluntary and required youth community service. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 32, 47–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metz, E. C., & Youniss, J. (2005). Longitudinal gains in civic development through school-based required service. Political Psychology, 26, 413–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norris, P. (Ed.). (1999). Critical citizens: Global support for democratic governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, P. (2000). A virtuous circle: Political communications in postindustrial societies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Norris, P. (2002). Democratic phoenix: Reinventing political activism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Norris, P. (2003). Young people and political activism: From the politics of loyalties to the lolitics of choice? Report for the Council of Europe Symposium: Young people and democratic institutions: From disillusionment to participation, Strasbourg, 27–28 November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, P. (2011). Democratic deficit: Critical citizens revisited. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, J. E. (2001). Democracy in suburbia. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pancer, S. M., & Pratt, M. (1999). Social and family determinants of community service involvement in Canadian youth. In M. Yates & J. Youniss (Eds.), Roots of civic identity: International perspectives on community service and activism in youth (pp. 32–55). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pattie, C., Seyd, P., & Whiteley, P. (2003). Citizenship and civic engagement: Attitudes and behaviour in Britain. Political Studies, 51, 443–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paxton, P. (2002). Social capital and democracy: An interdependent relationship. American Sociological Review, 67, 254–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penner, L. A., & Finkelstein, M. A. (1998). Dispositional and structural determinants of volunteerism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 525–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. (1995). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6, 65–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D., Leonardi, R., & Nanetti, R. Y. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappaport, J. (1998). The Art of social change. Community narratives as resources for individual and collective identity. In X. B. Arriaga & S. Oscamp (Eds.), Addressing community problems (pp. 225–246). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, P. B., & Selbee, L. K. (2002). Early life experiences and other factors in the social dynamics of civic behavior. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rojas, H. (2008). Strategy versus understanding: How orientations toward political conversation influence political engagement. Communication Research, 35, 452–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rushton, J. P., Chrisjohn, R. D., & Fekken, G. C. (1981). The altruistic personality and the self-report altruism scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 2, 293–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saltmarsh, J., & Zlotkowski, E. (Eds.). (2011). Higher education and democracy: Essays on service-learning and civic engagement. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherrod, L. R., Torney-Purta, J., & Flanagan, C. A. (2010). Handbook of research on civic engagement in youth. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Skocpol, T., & Fiorina, M. P. (1999). Making sense of the civic engagement debate. In T. Skocpol & M. P. Fiorina (Eds.), Civic engagement in American democracy (pp. 1–27). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sloam, J. (2014). New voice, less equal: The civic and political engagement of young people in the United States and Europe. Comparative Political Studies, 47, 663–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoker, G. (2006). Why politics matters: Making democracy work. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teorell, J., Torcal, M., & Montero, J. R. (2007). Political participation: Mapping the terrain. In J. W. van Deth, J. R. Montero, & A. Westholm (Eds.), Citizenship and involvement in European democracies: A comparative analysis (pp. 334–357). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torcal, M., & Montero, J. R. (2006). Political disaffection in contemporary democracies: Social capital, institutions and politics. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uslaner, E. M. (2003). Civic engagement in America: Why people participate in political and social life. Unpublished paper, available on http://illinois-online.org/krassa/ps410/Readings/Uslaner,%20why%20people%20participate%20in%20social%20life%202013.pdf

  • Uslaner, E. M., & Brown, M. (2005). Inequality, trust, and civic engagement. American Politics Research, 33, 868–894.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Biezen, I., Mair, P., & Poguntke, T. (2012). Going, going, ... gone? The decline of party membership in contemporary Europe. European Journal of Political Research, 51, 24–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Gunsteren, H. R. (1998). A theory of citizenship: Organizing plurality in contemporary democracies. Boulder CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verba, S., & Nie, N. H. (1972). Participation in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice, equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts, R. J., & Flanagan, C. (2007). Pushing the envelope on youth civic engagement: A developmental and liberation psychology perspective. Journal of Community Psychology, 35, 779–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, R. G., & Pickett, K. (2009). The Spirit level: Why more equal societies almost always do better. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J., & Musick, M. (1997). Who cares? Toward an integrated theory of volunteer work. American Sociological Review, 62, 694–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winter, N. (2003). Social capital, civic engagement, and positive youth development outcomes. Washington, DC: Edna McConnell Clark Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Q. W., Perkins, D. D., & Chow, J. C. C. (2010). Sense of community, neighboring, and social capital as predictors of local political participation in China. American Journal of Community Psychology, 45, 259–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youniss, J., Bales, S., Christmas-Best, V., Diversi, M., Mclaughlin, M., & Silbereisen, R. (2002). Youth civic engagement in the twenty-first century. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 12, 121–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zukin, C., Keeter, S., Andolina, M., Jenkins, K., & Delli Carpini, M. X. (2006). A new engagement? Political participation, civic life, and the changing American citizen. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paschalis Arvanitidis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Arvanitidis, P., Nasioka, F. (2017). Civic Engagement of University Students: An Exploratory Analysis. In: Bitros, G., Kyriazis, N. (eds) Democracy and an Open-Economy World Order. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52168-8_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics