Advertisement

Exploring the Lived Experience of Middle School Students Engaged in Inquiry Based Learning

  • Shelly BuchananEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 676)

Abstract

This paper discusses the phenomenological investigation and study findings of middle school students engaged in a unique Inquiry Based Learning (IBL) model named here as Student Driven Inquiry (SDI). SDI is a form of IBL that privileges student autonomy. Phenomenology allows an in-depth look into the student lived experience through the use of open-ended interviews. This pilot study elicited six common themes of student experience: joy in study immersion; appreciation for autonomy; satisfaction with self-selected topic; enthusiasm for learning; considerations of time management; and stress in project completion. These themes suggest the SDI model is one of deeper, joyful student engagement and learning with a certain measure of stress. The student perspective of the lived experience of SDI adds important information to the growing conversation on K-12 Information Literacy (IL), inquiry learning models, and student motivation. Implications for curriculum development, instructional practice and further research are discussed.

Keywords

Information literacy Inquiry based learning Lived experience Phenomenology Project based learning Self-directed learning Student-centred learning Student driven inquiry 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I am thankful for the tireless guidance and joyful encouragement of Christine Bruce, Sylvia Edwards, and Mary Ann Harlan in writing this paper.

The Queensland University of Technology (QUT) granted permission for this research: Ethics Clearance # 1400000698.

References

  1. 1.
    van Manen, M.: Researching Lived Experience: Human Science for an Action Sensitive Pedagogy. State University of New York Press, Albany (1990)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barron, B., Darling-Hammond, L.: Teaching for meaningful learning. In: Darling-Hammond, L., Barron, B., Pearson, P.D., Schoenfeld, A.H., Stage, E.K., Zimmerman, T.D., Cervetti, G.N., Tilson, J. (eds.) Powerful Learning: What We Know About Teaching for Understanding. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bell, S.: Project-based learning for the 21st century: skills for the future. Clearing House 83(2), 39–43 (2010). doi: 10.1080/00098650903505415 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Buck Institute of Education: Why Project Based Learning? (2014). http://bie.org/about/why_pbl
  5. 5.
    Duffy, T.M., Raymer, P.L.: A practical guide and a constructivist rationale for inquiry-based learning. Educ. Technol. 50(4), 3–15 (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Krajcik, J.S., Blumenfeld, P.: Project-based learning. In: Sawyer, R.K. (ed.) The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences. Cambridge, New York (2006)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Small, T.: Assessing enquiry-based learning: developing objective criteria from personal knowledge. Curriculum J. 20(3), 253–270 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Thomas, J.: A Review of Research on Project-based Learning. Autodesk Foundation, San Rafael (2000). http://www.autodesk.com/foundation
  9. 9.
    Wolk, S.: School as inquiry. Kappan 90(2), 115–122 (2008)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Saunders-Stewart, K.S.: Students’ perceptions of the important outcomes of inquiry based teaching and learning. Doctoral Dissertation. Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database (UMI No. 762532588) (2008)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Saunders-Stewart, K.S., Gyles, P.D.T., Shore, B.M.: Student outcomes in inquiry instruction: a literature-derived inventory. J. Adv. Acad. 23, 5–31 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Crow, S.: Exploring the experiences of upper elementary school children who are intrinsically motivated to seek information. Sch. Libr. Res. 14 (2011)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Heinstrom, J.: Fast surfing for availability or deep diving into quality: motivation and information seeking among middle and high school students. Inf. Res. 11(4), 7 (2006)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Patall, E.A.: Constructing motivation through choice, interest, and interestingness. J. Educ. Psychol. 105(2), 522–534 (2013).  10.1037/a0030307,  10.1037/a0030307.supp
  15. 15.
    Seifert, T.: Understanding student motivation. Educ. Res. 46(2), 137–149 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Blumenfeld, P.C., Kempler, T.M., Krajcik, J.S., Blumenfeld, P.: Motivation and cognitive engagement in learning environments. In: Sawyer, R.K. (ed.) The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences. Cambridge, New York (2006)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bruce, C.: The Relational Approach: A New Model for Information Literacy. New Rev. Libr. Inf. Res. 3, 1–22 (1997)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bruce, C.: Information literacy as a catalyst for educational change: a background paper. In: Danaher, P. (ed.) Lifelong Learning: Whose Responsibility and What is Your Contribution? The 3rd International Lifelong Learning Conference, Yeppoon, Queensland (2004)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Elmborg, J.K.: Teaching at the desk: toward a reference pedagogy. Portal 2(3), 455–464 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Elmborg, J.K.: Libraries as the spaces between us: recognizing and valuing the third space. Ref. User Serv. Q. 50(4), 338–350 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kuhlthau, C.C.: Inside the search process: information seeking from the user’s perspective. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 42(5), 361 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kuhlthau, C.: Teaching the Library Research Process, 2nd edn. Scarecrow Press, Metuchen (1994)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Deci, E.L., Ryan, R.M.: Intrinsic Motivation and Self-determination in Human Behavior. Plenum, New York (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bruce, C., Hughes, H.: Informed learning: a pedagogical construct attending simultaneously to information use and learning. Libr. Inf. Sci. Res. 32(4), A2–A8 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Information Systems SchoolQueensland University of Technology (QUT)BrisbaneAustralia
  2. 2.Gateway ProgramSan Jose State UniversitySan JoseUSA

Personalised recommendations