Advertisement

Institute for Research Design in Librarianship: Impact on Information Literacy Research and Practice

  • Lili LuoEmail author
  • Marie Kennedy
  • Kristine Brancolini
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 676)

Abstract

This paper provides a detailed view of the impact of a research methods training program (Institute for Research Design in Librarianship, or IRDL) on librarians’ research and practice related to information literacy. Participants identified the following benefits: improvement in research confidence, improvement in capability to interpret published research, improvement in capability to design and conduct research, improvement in capability to perform job responsibilities, a supportive network of librarian researchers, and career advancement.

Keywords

Information literacy research Research methods for information literacy Research methods training 

References

  1. 1.
    Luo, L., McKinney, M.: JAL in the past decade: a comprehensive analysis of academic library research. J. Acad. Librariansh. 41(2), 123–129 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Powell, R., Baker, L., Mika, P.: Library and information science practitioners and research. Libr. Inf. Sci. Res. 24(1), 50 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hernon, P., Schwartz, C.: Can research be assimilated into the soul of library and information science? Libr. Inf. Sci. Res. 17, 101–103 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Neal, J.: The research and development imperative in the academic library: path to the future. Portal Libr. Acad. 6(1), 1–3 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Perkins, G., Slowik, A.: The value of research in academic libraries. Coll. Res. Libr. 74(2), 143–158 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Luo, L.: Fusing research into practice: the role of research methods education. Libr. Inf. Sci. Res. 33(3), 191–201 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Turcios, M.E., Agarwal, N.K., Watkins, L.: How much of library and information science literature qualifies as research? J. Acad. Librariansh. 40(5), 473–479 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Stephen, M., Abbas, J., Garnar, M., Kennedy, M., Kenney, B., Luo, L.: Bridging the divide: exploring LIS research and practice. In: President’s Panel presented at the 2016 Annual Conference of the Association of Library and Information Science Education, 5–8 January, Boston (2016)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kennedy, M.R., Brancolini, K.R.: Academic librarian research: a survey of attitudes, involvement, and perceived capabilities. Coll. Res. Libr. 73(5), 431–448 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chu, H.: Research methods in library and information science: a content analysis. Libr. Inf. Sci. Res. 37(1), 36–41 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Stoan, S.K.: Research and library skills: an analysis and ınterpretation. Coll. Res. Libr. 45, 99–109 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of InformationSan Jose State UniversitySan JoseUSA
  2. 2.Loyola Marymount University LibraryLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations