Advertisement

Searching as Strategic Exploration: How Well Do Faculty Know Their Students’ Opinions Regarding Information Sources?

  • Katia G. KaradjovaEmail author
  • Marissa M. Mourer
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 676)

Abstract

A research study at a rural, public university revealed gaps between faculty perception and student opinion on the importance and difficulty of use of information sources. This study shares the significant gaps discovered across four common stages related to the preparation of academic course assignments and the information-seeking process. The results of the study are intended to inform information literacy instructional practice and drive dialogue across a campus to support students where they are rather than where we hope them to be.

Keywords

Information literacy Information-seeking behavior Undergraduate students Information sources 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the HSU Library Dean, Cyril Oberlander, for supporting the research project and the HSU Institutional Research and Planning (IRP) office for administering the surveys and gathering the data.

Both corresponding survey questionnaires, student and faculty, are available upon request.

References

  1. 1.
    He, D., Wu, D., Yue, Z., Fu, A., Thien Vo, K.: Undergraduate students’ interaction with online information resources in their academic tasks: a comparative study. Aslib Proc. 64(6), 615–640 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Saunders, L.: Faculty perspectives on information literacy as a student learning outcome. J. Acad. Librarianship 38(4), 226–236 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Aguirre, M., Fleming-May, R.: “You Just Type in What You are Looking for”: undergraduates’ use of library resources vs wikipedia. J. Acad. Librarianship 38(6), 391–399 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Asher, A.D., Duke, L.M.: Searching for answers: student research behavior at Illinois Wesleyan University. In: College Libraries and Student Culture: What We Now Know, pp. 71–86. American Library Association, Chicago (2012)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Head, A.J., Eisenberg, M.B.: Finding Context: What Today’s College Students Say about Conducting Research in the Digital Age. Project Information Literacy Progress Report, Project Information Literacy (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kuhlthau, C.C.: Inside the search process: information seeking from the user’s perspective. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 42(5), 361–371 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ajiboye, J.O., Tella, A.: University undergraduate students’ information seeking behaviour: implications for quality in higher education in Africa. TOJET: Turkish Online J. Educ. Technol. 6(1) (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Timmers, C.F., Glas, C.A.W.: Developing scales for information-seeking behaviour. J. Documentation 66(1), 46–69 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Martin, J.: Investigation of factors affecting information literacy student learning outcomes fails to undercover significant findings. Evid. Based Libr. Inf. Pract. 6(2), 59–60 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Martin, J.: The information seeking behavior of undergraduate education majors: does library instruction play a role? Evid. Based Libr. Inf. Pract. 3(4), 4 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ganley, B.J., Gilbert, A., Rosario, D.: Faculty and student perceptions and behaviours related to information literacy: a pilot study using triangulation. J. Inf. Literacy 7(2), 80–96 (2013)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Raven, M.: Bridging the gap: understanding the differing research expectations of First-Year Students and Professor. Evid. Based Libr. Inf. Pract. 7(3), 4–31 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cope, J., Sanabria, J.E.: Do we speak the same language? A study of faculty perceptions of information literacy. Portal Libr. Acad. 14(4), 475–501 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gullikson, S.: Faculty perceptions of ACRL’s information literacy competency standards for higher education. J. Acad. Librarianship 32(6), 583–592 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tyron, J., Frigo, E.E., O’Kelly, M.K.: Using teaching faculty focus groups to assess information literacy core competencies at university level. J. Inf. Literacy 4(2), 62–77 (2010)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Currie, L., Devlin, F., Emde, J., Graves, K.: Undergraduate search strategies and evaluation criteria: searching for credible sources. New Libr. World 111(3/4), 113–124 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Diehm, R.A., Lupton, M.: Approaches to learning information literacy: a phenomenographic study. J. Acad. Librarianship 38(4), 217–225 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    MacMillan, M.: Watching learning happen: results of a longitudinal study of journalism students. J. Acad. Librarianship 35(2), 132–142 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Procter, R., Goldenberg, A., Davenport, E., McKinlay, A.: Genres in support of collaborative information retrieval in the virtual library. Interact. Comput. 10(2), 157–175 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Warwick, C., Rimmer, J., Blandford, A., Gow, J., Buchanan, G.: Cognitive economy and satisfying in information seeking: a longitudinal study of undergraduate information behavior. J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci. Technol. 60(12), 2402–2415 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Whitlock, B., Ebrahimi, N.: Beyond the library: using multiple, mixed measures simultaneously in a college-wide assessment of information literacy. Coll. Res. Libr. 77(2), 236–262 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Dubicki, E.: Faculty perceptions of students’ information literacy skills competencies. J. Inf. Literacy 7(2), 97–125 (2013)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jackson, B., MacMillan, M., Sinotte, M.: Great Expectations: Results from a Faculty Survey of Students’ Information Literacy Proficiency. Institutional Repository, Mount Royal University (2014)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Leckie, G.J.: Desperately seeking citations: uncovering faculty assumptions about the undergraduate research process. J. Acad. Librarianship 22(3), 201–208 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Leckie, G.J., Fullerton, A.: Information literacy in science and engineering undergraduate education: Faculty Attitudes and Pedagogical Practices. Coll. Res. Libr. 60(1), 9–29 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Miller, I.R.: Turning the tables: a faculty-centered approach to integrating information literacy. Ref. Serv. Rev. 38(4), 647–662 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zanin-Yost, A.: Designing information literacy: teaching. Collaborating Growing New Libr. World 113(9/10), 448–461 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bury, S.: faculty attitudes, perceptions and experiences of information literacy: a study across multiple disciplines at York University, Canada. J. Inf. Literacy 5(1), 45–64 (2011)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hrycaj, P.L., Russo, M.F.: A survey of LSU faculty attitudes toward library research instruction. Louisiana Libr. 69(4), 15–25 (2007)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hrycaj, P., Russo, M.: Reflections on surveys of faculty attitudes toward collaboration with librarians. J. Acad. Librarianship 33(6), 692–696 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Singh, A.B.: A report on faculty perceptions of students’ information literacy competencies in journalism and mass communication programs: the ACEJMC survey. Coll. Res. Libr. 66(4), 294–311 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kunkel, L.R., Weaver, S.M., Cook, K.N.: What do they know?: An assessment of undergraduate library skills. J. Acad. Librarianship 22(6), 430–434 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Colon-Aguirre, M., Freberg, K., Allard, S.: Perceptions and uses of google scholar among undergraduate students. In: Paper presented at the “Science Communication and Information Research” 33rd Annual Research Symposium College of Communication and Information, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN (2011)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lawrence, K.: Today’s college students: skimmers, scanners and efficiency-seekers. Inf. Serv. Use 35(1/2), 89–93 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Suarez, D.: Making sense of Liaison Consultations: using reflection to understand information-seeking behavior. New Libr. World 114(11/12), 527–541 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Holman, L.: Millennial students’ mental models of search: implications for academic librarians and database developers. J. Acad. Librarianship 37(1), 19–27 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Rempel, J., Cossarini, D.: Communicating the relevance of the library in the age of google: improving undergraduate research skills and information literacy through new models of library instruction. Nordic J. Inf. Literacy Higher Educ. 5(1), 49–53 (2013)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Miller, S., Murillo, N.: Why don’t students ask librarians for help?: Undergraduate help-seeking behavior in three academic libraries. In: College Libraries and Student Culture: What We Now Know, pp. 49–70. American Library Association, Chicago (2012)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    DaCosta, J.W.: Is there an information literacy skills gap to be bridged? An examination of faculty perceptions and activities relating to information literacy in the United States and England. Coll. Res. Libr. 71(3), 203–222 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Lundstrom, K., Shrode, F.: Undergraduates and topic selection: a librarian’s role. J. Libr. Innovation 4(2), 23–41 (2013)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Whitmire, E.: Disciplinary differences and undergraduates’ information-seeking behavior. J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci. Technol. 53(8), 631–638 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Humboldt State University (HSU)ArcataUSA

Personalised recommendations