Advertisement

How Information Literate Are We as Teachers?

  • Jos van HelvoortEmail author
  • Ellen Sjoer
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 676)

Abstract

The purpose of the research was to provide academic staff with insights into their own information behavior and to motivate them to refer to relevant, accurate and reliable resources in their own course materials. To achieve this we used a participative research approach. Six participants assessed course materials created by themselves or by colleagues from their own department. It was found that in the course materials for the undergraduate ICT program of a university of applied sciences, in-text citations are often missing. If references are made, they are mainly references to general information sources like handbooks and popular or semi-scholarly websites. We discussed these findings in a focus group. An important additional benefit was the experience acquired with the participative research approach for improving the staff’s own information behavior.

Keywords

Information literacy Higher education Teaching staff Participative research Citation analysis Focus groups 

References

  1. 1.
    Ananiadou, K., Claro, M.: 21st Century Skills and Competences for New Millennium Learners in OECD Countries. OECD Education Working Papers 41 (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    de Haan, J., Huysmans, F.: Informatievaardigheden in een Kennissamenleving. In: Investeren in Vermogen: Sociaal en Cultureel Rapport 2006, pp. 92–115. Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau, Den Haag (2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Smith, J., Oliver, M.: Exploring behaviour in the online environment: student perceptions of information literacy. Res. Learn. Technol. 13(1), 49–65 (2005)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Moore, A., Ivory, G.: investigating and improving the information literacy of college faculty. In: Paper presented at the University Council of Educational Administrators Convention, Albuquerque, New Mexico (2000)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Godwin, P.: making life easier for academics: how librarians can help staff weather the technological storm. J. eLiteracy 2(2), 68–79 (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Urquhart, C., Rowley, J.: Understanding student information behavior in relation to electronic information services: lessons from longitudinal monitoring and evaluation part 2. J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci. Technol. 58(8), 1188–1197 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Probert, E.: Information literacy skills: teacher understandings and practice. Comput. Educ. 53(1), 24–33 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    van Helvoort, J.: A scoring rubric for performance assessment of information literacy in Dutch Higher Education. J. Inf. Liter. 4(1), 22–39 (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    van Helvoort, J.: Beoordelen van Informatievaardigheden in het Hoger Onderwijs (Doctoral Dissertation, University of Amsterdam) (2016)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
  11. 11.
    Hennink, M.: Focus Group Discussions. Oxford University Press (2014)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Citations: Guidelines for Adding References to Powerpoint Presentations. http://academia.stackexchange.com/questions/37418/guidelines-for-adding-references-to-powerpoint-presentations

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sustainable Talent Development Research GroupThe Hague University of Applied SciencesThe HagueThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations