Advertisement

The Academic Reading Format International Study (ARFIS): Investigating Students Around the World

  • Diane MizrachiEmail author
  • Joumana Boustany
  • Serap Kurbanoğlu
  • Güleda Doğan
  • Tania Todorova
  • Polona Vilar
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 676)

Abstract

This paper presents results from the Academic Reading Format International Study (ARFIS), the largest investigation of university students’ behaviors and attitudes towards reading their academic texts on electronic screens and print. These questions are examined: ‘When engaging with their academic material, do students’ format preferences and behaviors vary across cultures?; How do their behaviors and attitudes compare among an international sample?; And how does the language of the reading impact format preferences?’ Amalgamated results from nearly 10,000 students in 19 countries show a consistently strong preference for print format, and most respondents do not feel the language of the text impacts their format preference, but an examination of country responses helps illustrate the subtle differences between them. This topic has special relevance to librarians and educators as we search for the correct balance of print and electronic resources in our collections and syllabi.

Keywords

Print reading Electronic reading Academic reading International studies College students’ readings 

References

  1. 1.
    Liu, Z., Huang, X.: Gender differences in the online reading environment. J. Documentation 64(4), 616–626 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Liu, Z.: Print vs. electronic resources: a study of user perceptions, preferences, and use. Inf. Process. Manage. 42, 583–592 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fortunati, L., Vincent, J.: Sociological insights on the comparison of writing/reading on paper with writing/reading digitally. J. Telematics Inform. 31(1), 39–51 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Taipale, S.: Bodily dimensions of reading and writing practices on paper and digitally. J. Telematics Inform. 32, 766–775 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Farinosi, M., Lim, C., Roll, J.: Book or screen, pen or keyboard? A cross-cultural sociological analysis of writing and reading habits basing on Germany, Italy and the UK. J. Telematics Inform. 33, 410–421 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Baron, N.: Words Onscreen: The Fate of Reading in a Digital World. Oxford University Press, New York (2015)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mizrachi, D.: Undergraduates’ academic information and library behaviors: preliminary results. J. Ref. Serv. Rev. 38(4), 571–580 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mizrachi, D.: Undergraduates’ academic reading format preferences and behaviors. J. Acad. Librarianship 41, 301–311 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Diane Mizrachi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Joumana Boustany
    • 2
  • Serap Kurbanoğlu
    • 3
  • Güleda Doğan
    • 3
  • Tania Todorova
    • 4
  • Polona Vilar
    • 5
  1. 1.University of CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.Université Paris DescartesParisFrance
  3. 3.Hacettepe UniversityAnkaraTurkey
  4. 4.University of Library Studies and Information TechnologiesSofiaBulgaria
  5. 5.University of LjublianaLjubljanaSlovenia

Personalised recommendations