Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

What’s in an Image?: Towards a Critical and Interdisciplinary Reading of Participatory Visual Methods

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Creating Social Change Through Creativity

Abstract

Drawing on theory from sociology, anthropology, education, cultural studies, contemporary art and health, this chapter sketches out what a critical and interdisciplinary reading of participatory visual methods (PVMs) might look like for researchers and practitioners. Grounding my analysis in the use of photo-based methods‚ I invite researchers and practitioners to challenge our assumptions about the inherent potential of PVMs, by intervening in common appeals to PVMs ability to empower, transform, or re-distribute power relations in and of themselves. Such simplistic accounts of PVMs as fun, empowering, and transformative in-and-of-themselves may serve to obfuscate power relations, and restrict our ability to engage with the nuances, ethical tensions, and specific opportunities that working with specific visual art forms provide. To demonstrate this, I look to three theoretical areas: photography and the ‘truth effect’; photography, representation and visual literacies; and the rhetoric of participation. I conclude by reflecting on the implications of these critiques for PVMs more broadly, so that we can engage in a more nuanced discussion about the methodological opportunities and tensions of this work.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Barndt, D. (2001). Naming, making and connecting: Reclaiming lost arts—the pedagogical possibilities of photo story production. In P. Campbell & B. Burnaby (Eds.), Participatory practices in adult education (pp. 31–54). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barndt, D. (2004). By whom and for whom?: Intersections of participatory research and community art. In A. Cole, L. Neilsen, G. Knowles, & T. Luciani (Eds.), Provoked by art: Theorizing arts-informed research (Vol. 2, pp. 221–234). Halifax, NS: Backalong Books and Centre for Arts-informed Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, C. (2012). Artificial hells : Participatory art and the politics of spectatorship. London: Verso Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boydell, K. M., Volpe, T., Cox, S., Katz, A., Dow, R., Brunger, F., … Wong, L. (2012). Ethical challenges in arts-based health research. The International Journal of The Creative Arts in Interdisciplinary Practice (11).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, E. H., & Phu, T. (2014). Feeling photography. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. K. (2014). Regarding the pain of the Other: Photography, famine and the transference of affect. In E. H. Brown & T. Phu (Eds.), Feeling photography (pp. 181–203). London: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catalani‚ C.‚ & Minkler‚ M. (2010). Photovoice: A review of the literature in health and public health. Health Educ Behav, 37(3)‚ 424–451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chafden, R. (2011). Differentiating practices of participatory visual media production. In E. Margolis & L. Pauwels (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of visual research methods (pp. 186–200). Los Angeles: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers, G. (1999). Cultural colonialism and art education: Eurocentric and racist roots of art education. In D. G. Boughton (Ed.), Beyond multicultural art education: International perspectives (pp. 173–184). Berlin: Waxman Munster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, B., & Kothari, U. (2001). Participation: The new tyranny? New York: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drew, S. E., Duncan, R. E., & Sawyer, S. M. (2010). Visual storytelling: A beneficial but challenging method for health research with young people. Qualitative Health Research, 20(12), 1677–1688.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, J. & Hall, S. (1999). Visual culture: The reader. London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford-Smith, H. (2001). Whose community? Whose art?: The politics of reformulating community art. In M. Fernandez (Ed.), No frame around it: Process and outcome of the A space community art biennale. (pp. 11–27). Toronto: A Space Gallery.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, K. D. & al Sayah, F. (2011). Arts-based methods in health research: A systematic review of the literature. Arts and Health, 3(2), 110–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaztambide-Fernández, R. A. (2013). Why the arts don’t do anything: Toward a new vision for cultural production in education. Harvard Educational Review, 83(1), 211–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • González, J. (2006). Morphologies: Race as a visual technology. In M. Flanagan & A. Booth (Eds.), Re: Skin (pp. 339–353). Cambridge, MA: M.I.T Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gubrium, A. C. & Harper, L. (2013). Participatory visual and digital methods. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guta, A., Flicker, S., & Roche, B. (2013). Governing through community allegiance: A qualitative examination of peer research in community-based participatory research. Critical Public Health, 23(4), 432–451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, S. (1997). Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices. London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper, D. (2002). Talking about pictures: A case for photo elicitation. Visual Studies, 1(1), 13–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henkel, H., Stirrat, R., Cooke, B., & Kothari, U. (2001). Participation as spiritual duty; empowerment as secular subjection. In B. Cooke & U. Kothari (Eds.), Participation: The new tyranny? (pp. 168–184). New York: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtby, A., Klein, K., Cook, K., & Travers, R. (2015). To be seen or not to be seen: Photovoice, queer and trans youth, and the dilemma of representation. Action Research, 13(4), 317–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • hooks, b. (1995). Art on my mind: Visual politics, New York: New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutcheson, M. (2014). Making place work: Site-specific socially engaged art in 21st century Toronto. (Unpublished PhD Dissertation), York University, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, H. & Carpentier, N. (2013). Theorizing participatory intensities: A conversation about participation and politics. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 19, 265–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joanou, J. P. (2009). The bad and the ugly: Ethical concerns in participatory photographic methods with children living and working on the streets of Lima, Peru. Visual Studies, 24(3), 214–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamil, M. (May 2015). On horror and civility: Contagion as praxis of pro-palestinian activism. Paper presented at the Critical Ethnic Studies Conference, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwon, S. A. (2013). Uncivil youth: Race, activism, and affirmative governmentality. London: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lapenta, F. (2011). Some theoretical and methodological views on photo-elicitation. The SAGE handbook of visual research methods (pp. 201–213). London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Low, B., Rose, C., Salvio, P., & Palacios, L. (2012). Re:Framing the scholarship on participatory video: From celebration to critical engagement. In E.-J. Milne, C. Mitchell, & N. De Lange (Eds.), Handbook of participatory video (pp. 49–64). Lanham, Maryland: AltaMira Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luttrell, W., & Chalfen, R. (2010). Lifting up voices of participatory visual research. Visual Studies, 25(3), 197–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mannay, D. (2010). Making the familiar strange: Can visual research methods render the familiar setting more perceptible? Qualitative Research, 10(1), 91–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milne, E. J. (2012). Saying “no” to participatory video: Unravelling the complexities of non-participation. In E. J. Milne, C. Mitchell, and N. De Lange (Eds.), Handbook of participatory video (pp. 257–268). Lanham, Maryland: AltaMira Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milne, E. J., Mitchell, C., & De Lange, N. (2012). Introduction. In E. J. Milne, C. Mitchell, & N. De Lange (Eds.), Handbook of participatory video (pp. 1–16). Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, C. (2011). Doing visual research. Los Angeles: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Packard, J. (2008). ‘I’m gonna show you what it’s really like out here’: The power and limitation of participatory visual methods. Visual Studies, 23(1), 63–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pink, S. (2011). A multisensory visual approach to visual methods. In E. Margolis & L. Pauwels (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of visual research methods (pp. 601–614). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pink, S. (2013). Doing visual ethnography. (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prins, E. (2010). Participatory photography: A tool for empowerment or surveillance? Action Research, 8(4), 426–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puar, J. (2007). Terrorist assemblages: Homonationalism in queer times. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radley, A., & Taylor, D. (2003). Images of recovery: A photo-elicitation study on the hospital ward. Qualitative Health Research, 13(1), 77–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, G. (2012). Visual methodologies: An introduction to researching with visual materials. London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, G. (2013). On the relation between ‘visual research methods’ and contemporary visual culture. The Sociological Review, 62(1), 24-46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, G. (2015). Visual research methods in an expanded field: What’s next for visual research methods? Retrieved from https://visualmethodculture.wordpress.com/2015/09/25/visual-research-methods-in-an-expanded-field-what-next-for-visual-research-methods/.

  • Roth, L. (2009). Looking at shirley, the ultimate norm: Colour balance, image technologies, and cognitive equity. The Canadian Journal of Communication, 34(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, R. I. (2014). A pedagogy of witnessing : Curatorial practice and the pursuit of social justice. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steyerl, H. (2012). The wretched of the screen. Berlin: Sternberg Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strike, C., Guta, A., de Prinse, K., Switzer, S., & Chan Carusone, S. (2015). Opportunities, challenges and ethical issues associated with conducting community-based participatory research in a hospital setting. Research Ethics, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Switzer, S., Guta, A., de Prinse, K., Carusone, S. C., and Strike, C. (2015). Visualizing harm reduction: Methodological and ethical considerations. Soc Sci Med, 133, 77–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Switzer, S., Lyrauu, T., Apong, K., Bell, O., Manuel-Smith, C., Hernandez, L., . . . Bykes, A. (2016). What’s glitter got to do with it?: Re-imagining harm reduction, decision-making and the politics of youth engagement. In C. Smith and Z. Marshall (Eds.), Critical perspectives on harm reduction: Conflict, institutionalization, co-optation, depoliticization, and direct action. (pp. 113–133). New York: Nova Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tagg, J. (1999). Evidence, truth and order: A means for surveillance. In J. Evans & S. Hall (Eds.), Visual culture: The reader (pp. 244–273). London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tawil-Souri, H., & Aouragh, M. (2014). Intifada 3.0? Cyber colonialism and palestinian resistance. Arab Studies Journal, 22(1), 102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, D. (2003). The archive and the repertoire: Performing cultural memory in the americas. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teti, M., Murray, C., Johnson, L., & Binson, D. (2012). Photovoice as a community-based participatory research method among women living with HIV/AIDS: Ethical opportunities and challenges. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 7(4), 34–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuck, E., & Yang, K. W. (2011). Youth resistance revisited: New theories of youth negotiations of educational injustices. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 24(5), 521–530.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Leeuwen, T. (2011). Multimodality and multimodal research. In E. Margolis & L. Pauwels (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of visual research methods. California: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, J. (2011). Visual studies and empirical social inquiry. In E. Margolis & L. Pauwels (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of visual research methods (pp. 49–71).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C., & Burris, M. A. (1997). Photovoice: Concept, methodology, and use for participatory needs assessment. Health Education Behaviour, 24(3), 369–387.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, S. (2008). Visual images in research. In A. L. Cole & G. Knowles (Eds.), Handbook of the arts in qualitative research (pp. 41–53). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, L. (2003). The photography reader. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiles, R., Clark, A., & Prosser, J. (2011). Visual research ethics at the crossroads. In E. Margolis & L. Pauwels (Eds.), SAGE handbook of visual research methods (pp. 329–356). London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Special thanks to the many participants, facilitators, community artists and academics I have worked with over the years who have contributed to these conversations. In particular, thank you to Sarah Flicker, Deborah Barndt, Katherine Boydell, Rubén Gaztambide-Fernández, Honor Ford-Smith and June Larkin, whose academic mentorship shaped the arguments of this chapter. I extend gratitude to my colleagues Rebecca Noone, Erin Howley, Ciann Wilson, Hisayo Horie, Karen Darricades, Sahar Joya and Ruth Weber who provided valuable feedback on chapter drafts and concepts.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Environmental Studies, York University, Toronto, Canada

    Sarah Switzer

Authors
  1. Sarah Switzer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. California State University, Northridge, Northridge, USA

    Moshoula Capous-Desyllas

  2. California State University, Northridge, Northridge, USA

    Karen Morgaine

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Switzer, S. (2018). What’s in an Image?: Towards a Critical and Interdisciplinary Reading of Participatory Visual Methods. In: Capous-Desyllas, M., Morgaine, K. (eds) Creating Social Change Through Creativity. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52129-9_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52129-9_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-52128-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-52129-9

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation