Skip to main content

Learning Quality Evaluation of MOOC Based on Big Data Analysis

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Smart Computing and Communication (SmartCom 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 10135))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The popularity of Massive Open Online Courses has been rapidly growing recently. However, the completion rates of MOOC appear to be quite low. Moreover, the learning quality is quite doubtful for administrators of Universities since there is no suitable tools to evaluate it. Benefitting from the online environment, MOOC platforms can collect and store a huge amount of data related to learning processes. We use Storm as the parallel computing tool to accomplish the data analysis of MOOC. Our research focuses on three types of learning quality evaluation: relationship between students’ forum participation and their academic performance, relationship between students’ forum emotion and their academic performance, relationship between students’ video seeking operation and their academic performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Chen, D., Feng, Y., Zhao, Z., Jiang, J., Yu, J.: Does MOOC really work effectively. In: 2014 IEEE International Conference on MOOC, Innovation and Technology in Education (MITE), pp. 272–277. IEEE (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Parr, C.: MOOC completion rates below 7%. Times Higher Education (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wen, M., Yang, D., Rose, C.: Sentiment analysis in MOOC discussion forums: What does it tell us? In: Educational Data Mining 2014 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chaturvedi, S., Goldwasser, D., Daumé III, H.: Predicting instructor’s intervention in MOOC forums. In: ACL, vol. 1, pp. 1501–1511 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Shi, C., Siwei, F., Chen, Q., Huamin, Q.: VisMOOC: Visualizing video clickstream data from massive open online courses. In: 2015 IEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium (PacificVis), pp. 159–166. IEEE (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brinton, C.G., Buccapatnam, S., Chiang, M., Poor, H.V.: Mining MOOC clickstreams: On the relationship between learner video-watching behavior and performance. In: ACD Conference on Knowledge Dicrovery and Data Mining (SIGKDD) (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rosé, C.P., Siemens, G.: Shared task on prediction of dropout over time in massively open online courses. In: Proceedings of the EMNLP, vol. 14, p. 39 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Whitehill, J., Williams, J.J., Lopez, G., Coleman, C.A., Reich, J.: Beyond prediction: First steps toward automatic intervention in MOOC student stopout. SSRN 2611750 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Taylor, C., Veeramachaneni, K., O’Reilly, U.-M.: Likely to stop? predicting stopout in massive open online courses (2014). arXiv preprint arXiv:1408.3382

  10. Crossley, S., Paquette, L., Dascalu, M., McNamara, D.S., Baker, R.S.: Combining click-stream data with NLP tools to better understand MOOC completion. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge, pp. 6–14. ACM (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tseng, S.-F., Tsao, Y.-W., Yu, L.-C., Chan, C.-L., Lai, K.R.: Who will pass? analyzing learner behaviors in MOOCs. Res. Pract. Technol. Enhanced Learn. 11(1), 1 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chaplot, D.S., Rhim, E., Kim, J.: Predicting student attrition in MOOCs using sentiment analysis and neural networks. In: Proceedings of AIED 2015 Fourth Workshop on Intelligent Support for Learning in Groups (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ren, Z., Rangwala, H., Johri, A.: Predicting performance on MOOC assessments using multi-regression models (2016). arXiv preprint arXiv:1605.02269

  14. Balakrishnan, G., Coetzee, D.: Predicting student retention in massive open online courses using hidden markov models. Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences University of California at Berkeley (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kloft, M., Stiehler, F., Zheng, Z., Pinkwart, N.: Predicting MOOC dropout over weeks using machine learning methods. In: Proceedings of the EMNLP 2014 Workshop on Analysis of Large Scale Social Interaction in MOOCs, pp. 60–65 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This paper is supported by Ministry of Education - China Mobile Research Fund of China under Granted No. MCM20150605.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Zihao Zhao or Haopeng Chen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zhao, Z., Wu, Q., Chen, H., Wan, C. (2017). Learning Quality Evaluation of MOOC Based on Big Data Analysis. In: Qiu, M. (eds) Smart Computing and Communication. SmartCom 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10135. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52015-5_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52015-5_28

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-52014-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-52015-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics