Skip to main content

“Dead End” The Failure of Political Solutions to Pakistan’s Nuclear Ambitions, January 1979 to December 1979

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
America, Britain and Pakistan’s Nuclear Weapons Programme, 1974-1980
  • 270 Accesses

Abstract

Parallel to the emergence of the ‘Islamic bomb’ as an issue, there was also a hugely significant change in US-UK non-proliferation policy towards Pakistan during 1979. This was the change from a strategy of preventing nuclear acquisition to one of mitigating the worst effects of inevitable acquisition. The Carter administration and the Callaghan and Thatcher governments radically changed their non-proliferation policies in the case of Pakistan, in essence acquiescing to eventual Pakistani nuclear status while taking as much overt and covert action as possible to retard the attainment of that status. For the ardently non-proliferationist Carter administration, the gradual switch from prevention to mitigation came about because of Pakistani intransigence and an unwillingness to make concessions on the nuclear front. The request for Pakistan not to test a nuclear device was at the crux. Such a demand would maintain non-proliferation credibility by removing the potential for a very public embarrassment. The move to mitigation did not, however, go unchallenged. Dedicated non-proliferationists on both sides of the Atlantic sought to maintain a more stringent non-proliferation policy. British efforts to provide a global political answer foundered because of reticence amongst the nuclear weapon states and nuclear supplier states—particularly America—to consider yet another nuclear agreement at a time when SALT II, the CTB, and—in particular—INFCE were all being discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Department of State (hereafter State) to United States Embassy (hereafter USE) New Delhi, ‘Non-proliferation in South Asia’, June 6, 1979, Wilson Center History and Public Policy Program Digital Archive (hereafter WCDA), http://digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org/document/114198 (accessed September 9, 2013), 1–2.

  2. 2.

    Moberly to Alston, ‘Pakistan Nuclear’, January 16, 1979, The National Archives of the United Kingdom (hereafter TNA) Records of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (hereafter FCO) 96/947.

  3. 3.

    ‘Summary Record of a Meeting Held in the Foreign and Commonwealth Office Between Mr D F Murray and Mr Tom Thornton’, January 16, 1979, TNA FCO96/947, 2–3.

  4. 4.

    ‘Summary record of a Call on Mr Donald Murray by Mr Jack Miklos’, January 22, 1979, TNA FCO96/947, 2.

  5. 5.

    White to Weston, ‘Pakistan: Nuclear’, January 25, 1979, TNA FCO96/947, 1.

  6. 6.

    Naim Salik, The Genesis of South Asian Nuclear Deterrence: Pakistan’s Perspective (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), 153–154.

  7. 7.

    Ibid., 154.

  8. 8.

    Fearn to Lavers, ‘Pakistan: Economic Angles’, March 5, 1979, TNA FCO96/949, 1.

  9. 9.

    Bushell to Moberly, ‘South Asian Nuclear Weapons Free Zone (SANWFZ)’, February 21, 1979, TNA FCO96/948; Mallaby to Moberly, ‘India, Pakistan and Nuclear Weapons’, March 8, 1979, TNA FCO96/948.

  10. 10.

    Ibid.

  11. 11.

    Cortazzi, ‘India, Pakistan, and Nuclear Weapons’, March 9, 1979, TNA FCO96/949, 2.

  12. 12.

    ‘Record of a Conversation Between Mr H A H Cortazzi and M. Jean Noiville: South Asian Nuclear Matters’, March 21, 1979, TNA FCO96/952; James to Cortazzi, ‘South Asian Nuclear Security Treaty’, April 12, 1979, TNA FCO 96/952, 1.

  13. 13.

    Thomson to Holloway, ‘Regional Security Threat’, March 15, 1979, TNA FCO96/950, 4.

  14. 14.

    Burns to Parsons, ‘Pakistan Nuclear’, Undated, TNA FCO96/950, 6–9.

  15. 15.

    Alston to Moberly, ‘Pakistan’s Nuclear Ambitions’, March 22, 1979, TNA FCO96/950, 1.

  16. 16.

    Cortazzi to Rose, ‘Pakistan and China: Nuclear Questions’, April 12, 1979, TNA FCO96/950, 1.

  17. 17.

    Moberly to Bondi, ‘Non-proliferation After INFCE’, June 11, 1979, TNA FCO96/955, 1.

  18. 18.

    Alston to Moberly, ‘Non-proliferation Policy’, June 1, 1979, TNA FCO37/2205; ‘India/Pakistan Nuclear: Record of a Meeting’, June 5, 1979, TNA FCO96/955, 1; United Kingdom High Commission (hereafter UKHC) New Delhi to Foreign and Commonwealth Office (hereafter FCO), ‘India/Pakistan Nuclear’, April 12, 1979, TNA FCO96/952; Wall to Mallaby, ‘Pakistan and Nuclear Weapons’, April 2, 1979, TNA FCO96/951, 1.

  19. 19.

    FCO to United Kingdom Embassy (hereafter UKE) Islamabad, ‘Pakistan, India, and Nuclear Weapons’, April 6, 1979, TNA FCO96/951; FCO to 10 Downing Street, ‘Pakistan Nuclear Programme’, April 30, 1979, TNA FCO96/953.

  20. 20.

    Schneider to Christopher, ‘Pakistan’, March 9, 1979, United States National Archives and Records Administration (hereafter NARA), Department of State, Central Files, Record Group 59 (hereafter RG59), Records of Warren Christopher (hereafter RWC), Box 56, 1.

  21. 21.

    Memorandum for Brzezinski, ‘While You Were Away’, March 13, 1979, Jimmy Carter Presidential Library (hereafter JCPL), Remote Archives Capture system (hereafter RAC) NLC-10-19-1-19-9, 1.

  22. 22.

    Raphael to Christopher et al., ‘Policy Toward Pakistan’, April 9, 1979, NARA, RG59, RWC, Box 57, Pakistan, 1–2.

  23. 23.

    Brzezinski to Carter, ‘Daily Report’, April 11, 1979, JCPL, RAC NLC 1-10-4-1-4, 1-2; Christopher to Carter, Memorandum, April 16, 1979, JCPL, RAC 128-14-6-12-5, 2.

  24. 24.

    USE Islamabad to State, March 5, 1979, 1.

  25. 25.

    State to USE London, ‘Pakistan’s Nuclear Problem’, April 13, 1979, JCPL, RAC NLC-16-116-2-40-0, 1-2.

  26. 26.

    Alston to Fearn, ‘Pakistan Nuclear Programme’, April 20, 1979, TNA FCO96/952, 2-3.

  27. 27.

    Thornton to Brzezinski, ‘Evening Report’, April 23, 1979, JCPL, RAC 24-100-4-22-6, 1.

  28. 28.

    USE Islamabad to State, ‘Luncheon Discussion of Nuclear Issues’, April 26, 1979, NARA, RG59, RWC, Box 57, Pakistan, 3.

  29. 29.

    Tarnoff to Brzezinski, ‘Issues Paper: U.S. Nuclear Strategy Towards India and Pakistan’, May 16, 1979, JCPL, RAC NLC-132-75-5-9-8, 1.

  30. 30.

    Ibid., 2.

  31. 31.

    Saunders and Pickering to Newsom, ‘Consultations with Congress on Arms Sales to Pakistan’, May 12, 1979, NARA, RG59, RWC, Box 57, Pakistan.

  32. 32.

    UKE Islamabad to FCO, ‘Pakistan Nuclear’, May 13, 1979, TNA FCO96/953, 1.

  33. 33.

    Tarnoff to Brzezinski, May 16, 1979, 3.

  34. 34.

    ‘Record of a Discussion Between the Secretary of State and Mr Cyrus Vance at the FCO’, May 21, 1979, TNA FCO37/2204, 2.

  35. 35.

    ‘PRC on Pakistan and Subcontinent Matters’, May 23, 1979, JCPL, RAC NLC-132-75-5-2-5, 2.

  36. 36.

    Ibid., 10.

  37. 37.

    Kreisberg to Christopher, ‘A Mediator for the South Asian Nuclear Problem’, May 22, 1979, NARA, RG59, Records of Anthony Lake (hereafter RAL), Box 5.

  38. 38.

    ‘PRC on Pakistan and Subcontinent Matters’, May 23, 1979, 4.

  39. 39.

    State to USE New Delhi, ‘Nuclear Dialogue with India’, June 2, 1979, National Security Archive Electronic Briefing Book (hereafter NSAEBB) ‘The United States and Pakistan’s Quest for the Bomb’ (hereafter USPQB), Doc.35A, 2–3.

  40. 40.

    USE New Delhi to State, ‘India and the Pakistan Nuclear Problem’, June 7, 1979, USPQB, Doc.35B, 1–2.

  41. 41.

    George Perkovich, India’s Nuclear Bomb: The Impact On Global Proliferation (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1999), 218.

  42. 42.

    State to USE New Delhi, June 6, 1979, 1.

  43. 43.

    Ibid., 2.

  44. 44.

    Ibid., 3.

  45. 45.

    Smith to Carter, ‘Nonproliferation in South Asia’, June 8, 1979, USPQB, Doc.36.

  46. 46.

    Brzezinski to Vance, ‘The South Asian Nuclear Problem’, June 19, 1979, USPQB, Doc.37.

  47. 47.

    In her 2014 study Or Rabinowitz argues that the Carter administration discarded the idea of a non-testing agreement. However, her analysis is hampered by not having accessed the critical materials available at the Carter Library. See Or Rabinowitz, Bargaining on Nuclear Tests: Washington and Its Cold War Deals (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014), 138.

  48. 48.

    Moberly to Bondi, ‘Non-proliferation After INFCE’, June 11, 1979, TNA FCO96/955, 3–5.

  49. 49.

    Article IV outlined the rights of parties to the treaty to research, produce, and use nuclear energy for peaceful purposes without discrimination.

  50. 50.

    Alston to Moberly, ‘Call by Ambassador Smith on Mr Hurd’, June 29, 1979, TNA FCO96/956.

  51. 51.

    ‘Call at FCO by Ambassador Smith’, June 29, 1979, TNA FCO96/957, 1–3.

  52. 52.

    Carter to Cromartie, ‘Draft Declaration on Nuclear Trade and Non-proliferation’, July 2, 1979, TNA FCO37/2206, 1.

  53. 53.

    White to Forster, ‘Pakistan: Relations With HMG’, July 27, 1979, TNA FCO96/957, 2.

  54. 54.

    Pakenham to Alston, Memorandum, August 3, 1979, TNA FCO96/958, 1.

  55. 55.

    Ibid., 2, 4.

  56. 56.

    Alston to Thomson, ‘Nonproliferation’, August 24, 1979, TNA FCO37/2207, 1; Moberly to Thomson, ‘Non-proliferation’, August 10, 1979, TNA FCO37/2207, 1.

  57. 57.

    Ibid., 1–2.

  58. 58.

    Carter to Cortazzi, ‘Briefs for Call at State Department, 9 August’, August 7, 1979, TNA FCO96/958, 2.

  59. 59.

    Weston to Cortazzi, ‘Pakistan’, August 10, 1979, TNA FCO96/958.

  60. 60.

    Alston to Thomson, August 24, 1979, 1.

  61. 61.

    Henderson to FCO, ‘Smith Study on Nuclear South Asia’, October 6, 1979, TNA FCO96/959.

  62. 62.

    Zia to Carter, Letter, September 29, 1979, JCPL, Records of the National Security Staff, Box 96 (hereafter RNSS96), Pakistan: Presidential Correspondence: 1-12/79, 2; Tarnoff to Brzezinski, ‘Response to Letters of August 9 and September 29 from President Zia of Pakistan to President Carter’, October 10, 1979, JCPL, RNSS96, Pakistan: Presidential Correspondence: 1-12/79.

  63. 63.

    Lake to Vance, ‘The Pakistan Strategy and Future Choices’, September 8, 1979, Wilson Center Digital Archive (hereafter WCDA), http//digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org/document/114217 (accessed September 9, 2013), 4–7.

  64. 64.

    Dennis Kux, Disenchanted Allies: The United States and Pakistan, 19472000 (Washington D.C.: Woodrow Wilson Center Press, 2001), 240–241.

  65. 65.

    ‘U.S. Aides Say Pakistan Reported to Be Building an A-Bomb Site’, New York Times (hereafter NYT), August 17, 1979, A6; CIA, ‘Alert Memorandum on Pakistani Plan for an Early Nuclear Test’, October 10, 1979, USPQB, Doc.43, 1.

  66. 66.

    Vance to Carter, Memorandum, October 17, 1979, JCPL, RAC NLC-128-14-12-11-9.

  67. 67.

    UKE Washington to FCO, ‘Nuclear Pakistan and the U.S.’, October 19, 1979, TNA FCO37/2209, 1–2.

  68. 68.

    On British test estimates see FCO to UKE Washington, ‘Nuclear Pakistan’, October 19, 1979, TNA FCO96/960; on Thornton’s views see UKE Washington to FCO, ‘Nuclear Pakistan and the U.S.’, (Thornton telegram) October 19, 1979, TNA FCO37/2209, 2.

  69. 69.

    ‘Speaking Note for Consultations on Pakistani Nuclear’, October 11, 1979, TNA FCO96/959, 1–2.

  70. 70.

    FCO to UKE Islamabad, ‘Pakistan Nuclear’, October 15, 1979, TNA FCO96/960, 1–2.

  71. 71.

    Robinson to Moberly, ‘Nuclear Pakistan’, October 22, 1979, TNA FCO96/960.

  72. 72.

    FCO to UKE Washington, ‘Nuclear Pakistan’, October 25, 1979, TNA FCO96/960.

  73. 73.

    ‘Zia Says he Has Not Ruled Out An Atom Bomb Test In Pakistan’, NYT, October 28, 1979, 9.

  74. 74.

    UKE Islamabad to FCO, ‘Nuclear Pakistan’, October 26, 1979, TNA FCO96/960, 1.

  75. 75.

    UKHC New Delhi to FCO, ‘Nuclear Proliferation’, October 30, 1979, TNA FCO96/960, 2.

  76. 76.

    Anon., ‘India/Pakistan and Non-proliferation’, October 20, 1979, TNA FCO96/960, 8–9.

  77. 77.

    Shane J. Maddock, Nuclear Apartheid: The Quest for American Atomic Supremacy from World War II to the Present (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2010), 125–126, 247–248.

  78. 78.

    Moberly, ‘The Sub-continent: Nuclear Issues’, October 30, 1979, TNA FCO96/960, 1–2.

  79. 79.

    Cortazzi, ‘The Sub-continent: Nuclear Issues’, October 30, 1979, TNA FCO96/960.

  80. 80.

    ‘Anglo-US Talks, FCO, London’, November 1, 1979, TNA FCO37/2208, 2.

  81. 81.

    Ibid., 4; FCO to Washington, ‘Pakistan Nuclear’, November 5, 1979, TNA FCO96/960, 1.

  82. 82.

    Smith to Vance, ‘Consultation in Europe on Pakistan’, November 15, 1979, USPQB, Doc.45, 2.

  83. 83.

    Alston to White, ‘Visit of Chairman Hua to Paris: Pakistan Nuclear’, October 25, 1979, TNA FCO96/960; FCO to Peking, ‘Premier Hua’s Visit’, November 6, 1979, TNA FCO96/960, 4.

  84. 84.

    CIA, ‘A Review of the Evidence of Chinese Involvement in Pakistan’s Nuclear Weapons Program’, December 7, 1979, JCPL, RAC NLC-15-37-6-3-6.

  85. 85.

    Smith to Vance, ‘Consultation in Europe’, November 15, 1979, 1.

  86. 86.

    , ‘Summary Record of a Call on Mr Peter Blaker by Shah Nawaz’, November 12, 1979, TNA FCO96/961, 1–2.

  87. 87.

    Ibid., 6.

  88. 88.

    White to Masefield, ‘Pakistan: Talks With Shah Nawaz’, November 16, 1979, TNA FCO96/961, 1–2.

  89. 89.

    UKE Islamabad to FCO, ‘Pakistan Nuclear’, December 3, 1979, TNA FCO96/961, 1–2; UKE Islamabad to FCO, ‘Anglo/Pakistan Relations’, December 5, 1979, TNA FCO96/961, 1–3.

  90. 90.

    Saunders, Pickering, and Lake to Vance, ‘November 14 PRC Meeting on South Asian Nuclear Issues’, November 10, 1979, USPQB, Doc.44, 7.

  91. 91.

    UKE Washington to FCO, ‘Nuclear South Asia’, December 13, 1979, TNA FCO96/961.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Craig, M.M. (2017). “Dead End” The Failure of Political Solutions to Pakistan’s Nuclear Ambitions, January 1979 to December 1979. In: America, Britain and Pakistan’s Nuclear Weapons Programme, 1974-1980. Security, Conflict and Cooperation in the Contemporary World. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51880-0_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51880-0_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-51879-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-51880-0

  • eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics