Skip to main content

“A dream of nightmare proportions” The ‘Islamic bomb’ and the ‘Khan Affair’, January 1979 to December 1979

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover America, Britain and Pakistan’s Nuclear Weapons Programme, 1974-1980
  • 283 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter examines in detail the public and private impact of the ‘Islamic bomb’ as an emergent issue in 1979, demonstrating that while there was a media outcry surrounding perceived proliferation throughout the Muslim world, such concerns did not have the same impact on policymakers. In government, understandings were subtler than those of the media and peripheral political figures. Senior politicians, civil servants, and diplomats recognised that faith was a cloak concealing nationalistic imperatives. They correctly assessed that Pakistan had an economic and political stake in portraying itself as the custodian of Muslim nuclear power, but found no evidence to suggest plans for wider, pan-Islamic proliferation. Media coverage of an Islamic bomb transformed public perceptions of Pakistan’s nuclear ambitions from a regional, South Asian matter to a multiregional problem affecting the Middle East and beyond. Although policymakers assessed that proliferation because of faith was not especially likely, the public perception of a potential Islamic nuclear capability needed to be combated. Representing a collision of culture, geopolitics, and international security, the mere mention of an Islamic bomb required a response in the febrile, fragile atmosphere of the late 1970s.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Tam Dalyell, House of Commons Debate, December 18, 1979, Hansard Online, http://hansard.millbanksystems.com/commons/1979/dec/18/joint-centrifuge-project-almelo#column_555 (accessed May10, 2013).

  2. 2.

    Odd Arne Westad, The Global Cold War: Third World Interventions and the Making of Our Times (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005), 295–296.

  3. 3.

    Kambiz GhaneaBassiri, A History of Islam in America (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010), 303; Fawaz Gerges, America and Political Islam: Clash of Cultures or Clash of Interests? (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), 7–8.

  4. 4.

    Lawrence Freedman, A Choice of Enemies: America Confronts the Middle East (New York: PublicAffairs, 2008), 86; Giles Kepel, Jihad: The Trail of Political Islam (London: I.B. Tauris, 2004), 98.

  5. 5.

    ‘Pakistan: Nuclear’, April 2, 1979, The National Archives of the UK (hereafter TNA) Records of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (hereafter FCO) 96/950; Translated transcript of ZDF broadcast, appended to Carter to Granger, ‘Pakistan’, April 20, 1979, TNA FCO 37/2203.

  6. 6.

    Translated transcript of ZDF broadcast April 20, 1979, 2–3. For a recent in-depth study of Libya’s nuclear programme, see Malfrid Braut-Hegghammer, Unclear Physics: Why Iraq and Libya Failed to Build Nuclear Weapons (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2016), 127–217.

  7. 7.

    ‘Pakistan Denies it is developing Nuclear Arms’, Washington Post (hereafter WP), April 9, 1979, front page; ‘How Pakistan Ran the Nuke Round the End’, New York Times (hereafter NYT), April 29, 1979, E5; ‘Arms Sales to Pakistan Urged to Stave Off A-Bomb There’, WP, August 6, 1979, A7; ‘Pakistan: The Quest for Atomic Bomb [sic]’, WP, August 27, 1979, A1.

  8. 8.

    Transcript of CBS Evening News, ‘Special Report on the Pakistani-Islamic Bomb, part 1‘, broadcast June 11, 1979, TNA FCO96/956, 3; Transcript of CBS Evening News, ‘Special Report on the Pakistani-Islamic Bomb, part 2’, broadcast June 12, 1969, TNA FCO96/956, 2.

  9. 9.

    Pakenham to Alston, ‘Nuclear Pakistan’, June 25, 1979, TNA FCO37/2206; Embassy of Pakistan, Washington D.C., Press Release, June 13, 1979, TNA FCO96/956, 1. In truth, Libya did provide money to Pakistan on the basis of the relationship between Gaddafi and Bhutto. This relationship waned after 1977 when Zia took power, and there is no evidence to suggest that sensitive transfers took place during the 1970s or that there was a deep-seated ‘Islamic’ dimension to the relationship. See Braut-Hegghammer, Unclear Physics, 159.

  10. 10.

    ‘Zia uninterested in N-weapons, says Desai’, The Guardian (hereafter TG), June 22, 1979, 6; ‘Dutch step up inquiry after security slip which ‘gave hydrogen bomb to Pakistan’’, TG, June 22, 1979, 6; ‘Security breach ‘cover-up’ at uranium plant’, TG, June 29, 1979, 3.

  11. 11.

    ‘How Pakistan Fooled the World and Got the Bomb’, 8 Days, June 23, 1979, 13.

  12. 12.

    TG, June 22, 1979; TG, June 29, 1979.

  13. 13.

    Leo Abse, House of Commons Debate, July 3, 1979, Hansard Online hansard.millbanksystems.com/commons/1979/jul/03/tokyo-summit-meeting#S5CV0969P0_19790703_HOC_223 (accessed May10, 2013).

  14. 14.

    William D. Edwards, ‘MCPL Nuclear Alert Series, IV’, July 12, 1979, Congressional Record, 96th Session (hereafter CR96), 18414–18415; Fortney H. Stark, ‘MCPL Nuclear Alert Series V’, September 6, 1979, CR96, 23432–23433; Fortney H. Stark, ‘Pakistan’s Nuclear Program’, October 23, 1979, CR96, 29252–29253

  15. 15.

    Lester L. Wolff, ‘Resolution of Inquiry into the Matter of Billy Carter’, September 10, 1980, CR96, 24958. On ‘Billygate’, see Salim Yaqub, Imperfect Strangers: Americans, Arabs, and U.S.-Middle East Relations in the 1970s (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2016), 316–318.

  16. 16.

    Michael Charlton, Interview with Mohammad Zia ul-Haq, Transcript, June 21, 1979, TNA FCO96/955, 1.

  17. 17.

    United Kingdom Embassy (hereafter UKE) Islamabad to Foreign and Commonwealth Office (hereafter FCO), ‘Pakistan Nuclear’, July 2, 1979, TNA FCO96/956, 1.

  18. 18.

    UKE Islamabad to FCO, ‘Pakistan Nuclear: Agha Shahi’s Press Briefing’, July 2, 1979, TNA FCO96/956, 2–3.

  19. 19.

    ‘Arms sales to Pakistan Urged to Stave Off A-Bomb There’, WP, April 6, 1979, A7.

  20. 20.

    ‘Pie in the nuclear sky may save Charan Singh’, TG, August 19, 1979, 7.

  21. 21.

    ‘Pakistan bomb link denied’, TG, August 23, 1979, 3.

  22. 22.

    D.K. Palit and P.K.S. Namboodiri, Pakistan’s Islamic Bomb (New Delhi: Vikas Press, 1979), v.

  23. 23.

    UKE Islamabad to FCO, ‘Pakistan’s Islamic Bomb: An Indian Survey’, August 1, 1979, TNA FCO37/2206.

  24. 24.

    ‘How Dr Khan Stole the Bomb for Islam’, The Observer (hereafter TO), December 9, 1979, 11.

  25. 25.

    ‘Atoms for War’, TO, December 16, 1979, 12.

  26. 26.

    ‘MPs to Debate Atom Bomb Revelations’, TO, December 16, 1979, 1; ‘MP Praises Observer’, TO, December 23, 1979, 14.

  27. 27.

    Dalyell, House of Commons, December 18, 1979.

  28. 28.

    Andrew J Rotter usefully dissects Said’s work in ‘Saidism Without Said: Orientalism and U.S. Diplomatic History’, American Historical Review, 105:4 (2000), 1207–1210.

  29. 29.

    Edward Said, Orientalism (London: Penguin, 2003), 287. The 1970s also saw the ‘Arab terrorist’, the perfidious ‘oil sheik’, and later the ‘Islamic revolutionary’ becoming more prominent in Western popular culture’s demonology. See Yaqub, Imperfect Strangers, 183–207.

  30. 30.

    Jonathan Lyons, Islam Through Western Eyes: From the Crusades to the War on Terrorism (New York; Columbia University Press, 2012), 124.

  31. 31.

    Ibid., 112.

  32. 32.

    Hugh Gusterson, ‘Nuclear Weapons and the Other in the Western Imagination’, Cultural Anthropology, 14:1 (1999), 112.

  33. 33.

    John Mueller, Atomic Obsession: Nuclear Alarmism from Hiroshima to Al-Qaeda (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), 89–91.

  34. 34.

    Seaward to Wilford, ‘Implications of the Indian Nuclear Test’, May 29, 1974, TNA FCO66/654, 5.

  35. 35.

    The JI (literally Islamic Party) was a socially conservative party that campaigned for governance according to Islamic principles.

  36. 36.

    Imray to Drew, ‘Pakistani Reactions to the Indian Nuclear Test’, May 29, 1974, TNA FCO66/663, 1.

  37. 37.

    Chalmers to Male, ‘Indian Nuclear Explosion’, June 3, 1974, TNA FCO66/654, 5.

  38. 38.

    Memcon, ‘Meeting with Foreign Minister Chavan’, October 7, 1975, Foreign Relations of the United States 1969–76 (hereafter FRUS 69–76), Vol.E8, Doc.214.

  39. 39.

    Fearn to Carberry, ‘Pakistan: Nuclear Reprocessing Plant’, June 24, 1977, TNA FCO37/2066, 1–2.

  40. 40.

    Burdess to Wilmshurst, ‘Pakistan Nuclear Affairs–The Reprocessing Plant’, November 14, 1977, TNA FCO96/728, 1.

  41. 41.

    ‘Notes on Proliferation—Global Highlights’, November 10, 1977, Jimmy Carter Presidential Library (hereafter JCPL), Remote Archives Capture system (hereafter RAC) NLC-28-63-3-16-2.

  42. 42.

    ‘Record of a Meeting Held at the State Department at 11.30 on December 2, 1977’, December 6, 1977, TNA FCO96/728, 3.

  43. 43.

    ‘Summary Record of a Meeting Held by Mr. H.A.H. Cortazzi’, March 5, 1979, TNA FCO96/949, 3.

  44. 44.

    Brzezinski to Carter, ‘Daily Report’, March 1, 1979, JCPL, RAC NLC-1-9-8-12-0.

  45. 45.

    UKE Islamabad to FCO, ‘Pakistan: Economic Angles’, March 5, 1979, TNA FCO96/949.

  46. 46.

    ‘Pakistan and the Symington Amendment’, March 17, 1979, United States National Archives and Records Administration (hereafter NARA) Record Group 59: State Department Central Files (hereafter RG59); Records of Warren Christopher, 1977–1980 (hereafter RWC), Box 56, Pakistan; Vance to Carter, ‘Nuclear Problems in the Sub-continent–Status Report’, March 19, 1979, JCPL, RAC NLC-15-37-5-11-8.

  47. 47.

    United Kingdom High Commission (hereafter UKHC) New Delhi to FCO, ‘Nuclear Developments’, January 30, 1979, TNA FCO96/947; UKHC New Delhi to FCO, ‘Nuclear Developments’, February 1, 1979, TNA FCO37/2200.

  48. 48.

    UKHC New Delhi to FCO, ‘Pakistan: Nuclear Weapons programme’, March 9, 1979, TNA FCO96/948.

  49. 49.

    FCO to UKHC New Delhi, ‘India/Pakistan Nuclear’, April 4, 1979, TNA FCO96/951.

  50. 50.

    USE Islamabad to State, ‘Nuclear Aspects of DepSec Visit Discussed with UK and French Ambassadors’, March 7, 1979, National Security Archive Electronic Briefing Book (hereafter NSAEBB) ‘The United States and Pakistan’s Quest for the Bomb’ (hereafter USPQB), Doc.26A, 2–3.

  51. 51.

    ‘Record of a Discussion in the State Department’, March 16, 1979, TNA FCO96/950, 1.

  52. 52.

    ‘India, Pakistan and Nuclear Weapons’, March 8, 1979, TNA FCO96/950.

  53. 53.

    ‘Pakistan’s Military Nuclear Programme: Pressures and Inducements’, March 23, 1979, TNA Records of the Cabinet Office (hereafter CAB) 130/1073.

  54. 54.

    Daniel Cordle, ‘Beyond the apocalypse of closure: nuclear anxiety in the postmodern literature of the United States’, in Andrew Hammond (ed.), Cold War Literature: Writing the Global Conflict (Abingdon: Routledge, 2006), 75fn7.

  55. 55.

    ‘Record of a Discussion in the State Department’, March 16, 1979, TNA FCO96/950, 1.

  56. 56.

    Ibid., 5.

  57. 57.

    ‘PRC Paper on South Asia’, March 23, 1979, USPQB, Doc.32A.

  58. 58.

    Carter [FCO] to Thomson, ‘Pakistan: Nuclear Weapons Intentions’, January 5, 1979, TNA FCO96/947.

  59. 59.

    Memorandum for Brzezinski, January 30, 1979, JCPL, RAC NLC-10-18-2-27-0; UKE Washington to FCO, ‘Pakistan Nuclear Developments’, January 27, 1979, TNA FCO96/947.

  60. 60.

    GEN 74, ‘Pakistan: Possible Timing of a Nuclear Explosion’, February 27, 1979, TNA CAB130/1073, 1–2. This is the first British document in which Khan is named.

  61. 61.

    ‘Pakistan: Nuclear Weapons Development Programme’, February 23, 1979, TNA FCO96/948.

  62. 62.

    FCO to UKE Paris, ‘Pakistan: Nuclear Weapons Development’, March 1, 1979, TNA FCO96/948; Macrae to Alston, ‘Pakistan: Nuclear Weapons Development’, March 8, 1979, TNA FCO96/949.

  63. 63.

    GEN 74, ‘Pakistan’s Nuclear Intentions’, February 27, 1979, TNA CAB130/1073.

  64. 64.

    State to USE Bern, ‘US-Swiss Discussions on Pakistan Nuclear programs’, March 6, 1979, JCPL, RAC NLC-16-115-5-25-5.

  65. 65.

    UKE Bern to FCO, ‘Pakistan Nuclear Weapons Development’, March 9, 1979, TNA FCO96/949.

  66. 66.

    State to USE Bonn, ‘Pakistani Nuclear Program’, March 6, 1979, JCPL, RAC NLC-16-115-5-26-4.

  67. 67.

    ‘Policy Review Committee Meeting’, March 9, 1979, JCPL, RAC NLC-132-73-6-5-3, 2.

  68. 68.

    Rhodri Jeffreys-Jones, The CIA and American Democracy, 3rd edition (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2003), 221; Dennis Kux, Disenchanted Allies: The United States and Pakistan, 1947–2000 (Washington D.C.: Woodrow Wilson Center Press, 2001), 241

  69. 69.

    Saunders and Pickering to Newsom, ‘Mini-PRC Meeting on the Pakistan Nuclear Problem’, January 20, 1979, USPQB, Doc.23A, 2.

  70. 70.

    ‘Summary of Conclusions: Mini-PRC on Nuclear Matters’, January 22, 1979, JCPL, RAC 24-102-7-4-1, 2.

  71. 71.

    Kux, Disenchanted Allies, 236.

  72. 72.

    Memorandum, January 30, 1979, JCPL, RAC NLC-128-9-16-7-6, 2; ‘Call on Mr P H Moberly by Mr T Pickering’, February 26, 1979, TNA FCO37/2200, 1; UKE Washington to FCO, ‘Indo-US Relations: Sino/Pakistan and Nuclear Dimensions’, February 21, 1979, TNA FCO96/948, 3–4.

  73. 73.

    Vance to Carter, Memorandum, March 2, 1979, JCPL, RAC NLC-128-14-5-2-7, 2; Kux, Disenchanted Allies, 239.

  74. 74.

    Smith to Christopher, ‘Memorandum to the Deputy Secretary’, March 27, 1979, NARA, RG59, RWC, Box 56, Pakistan III, 1

  75. 75.

    Ibid.

  76. 76.

    ‘Record of a Discussion in the State Department’, March 30, 1979, TNA FCO 96/951, 2–3.

  77. 77.

    USE Islamabad to State, ‘Pakistan’s Nuclear Program: Hard Choices’, March 5, 1979, NARA, RG59, RWC, Box 56, Pakistan II.

  78. 78.

    Oxman to Christopher, Note, March 5, 1979, NARA, RG59, RWC, Box 56, Pakistan II.

  79. 79.

    Saunders and Pickering to Vance, ‘A Strategy for Pakistan’, March 5, 1979, NARA, RG59, RWC, Box 56, Pakistan II, 2.

  80. 80.

    Handwritten marginalia, ‘A Strategy for Pakistan’, March 5, 1979, 7.

  81. 81.

    Slocombe to Lake, ‘FY-79 Security Assistance Supplemental’, March 2, 1979, NARA, RG59, RAL, Box 5; Blechman to Lake, ‘1979 Security Assistance Supplemental’, March 5, 1979, NARA, RG59, RAL, Box 5; Blechman to Gelb, ‘Paks Nobiscum?’, January 26, 1979, NARA, RG59, RAL, Box 5, 3.

  82. 82.

    Schneider to Newsom, et al., ‘FY ’79 Security Assistance Supplemental’, March 5, 1979, NARA, RG59, RAL, Box 5, 2.

  83. 83.

    ‘U.S. Aid to Pakistan Cut After Evidence of Atom Arms Plan’, NYT, April 7, 1979, 1; ‘U.S. Cutting Aid to Pakistan in A-Facility Dispute’, WP, April 7, 1979, A1; ‘Pakistan Denies It Plans A-Bomb: Denounces Washington Aid Cutoff’, NYT, April 9, 1979, A1.

  84. 84.

    On the Tarapur issue during late 1978 and early 1979, see George Perkovich, India’s Nuclear Bomb: The Impact On Global Proliferation (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1999), 218–219. On the problems posed by nuclear exports during the 1970s, see J. Samuel Walker, ‘Nuclear Power and Nonproliferation: The Controversy Over Nuclear Exports, 1974–1980’, Diplomatic History, 25:2 (2001), 215–249.

  85. 85.

    UKE Washington to FCO, ‘Pakistan Nuclear’, April 7, 1979, TNA FCO96/951, 1.

  86. 86.

    Lavers to Baxter, ‘Pakistan: Nuclear Weapons Programme’, April 6, 1979, TNA FCO96/951, 1–2.

  87. 87.

    UKE Bern to FCO, ‘Pakistan Nuclear’, May 3, 1979, TNA FCO96/953.

  88. 88.

    Alston to Whyte, ‘Pakistan Nuclear’, May 3, 1979, TNA FCO96/953, 2.

  89. 89.

    FCO to UKE Islamabad, ‘Speaking Note’, May 3, 1979, TNA FCO37/2203.

  90. 90.

    FCO to UKE Islamabad, ‘Pakistan: Nuclear’, June 4, 1979, TNA FCO37/2205.

  91. 91.

    White to Holloway, ‘Pakistan/Afghanistan’, April 17, 1979, TNA FCO96/952.

  92. 92.

    UKHC New Delhi to FCO, ‘Pakistan’, April 19, 1979, TNA FCO96/952, 1; Alston to White, ‘South Asia–Nuclear Issues’, April 19, 1979, TNA FCO96/952, 1; Mallaby to Alston, ‘South Asia–Nuclear Issues’, April 23, 1979, TNA FCO96/953, 1.

  93. 93.

    Carter to Granger, ‘Pakistan’, April 20, 1979, TNA FCO37/2203.

  94. 94.

    White House Situation Room to Brzezinski, ‘Additional Information Items’, April 10, 1979, JCPL, RAC NLC-1-10-3-25-9, 2.

  95. 95.

    USE Islamabad to State, ‘GOP Reacts to US Aid Decision: More Political Leaders Attack US Move’, April 9, 1979, RG59, RWC, Box 57, Pakistan.

  96. 96.

    State to USE Islamabad, ‘Contingency Press Guidance’, April 6, 1979, JCPL, RAC NLC-16-116-2-10-3, 4.

  97. 97.

    State to USE Amman et al., ‘The Pak Nuclear Problem and the Suspension of US Aid’, May 23, 1979, JCPL, RAC NLC-16-116-4-10-1, 3.

  98. 98.

    State to USE Canberra, ‘Pakistan’s Nuclear Program’, April 7, 1979, JCPL, RAC NLC-16-116-2-18-5.

  99. 99.

    Alston to Fearn, ‘Pakistan Nuclear Programme’, April 20, 1979, TNA FCO96/952, 3.

  100. 100.

    Bushell to Owen, ‘Pakistan–Valedictory Dispatch’, April 26, 1979, TNA FCO96/955, 7

  101. 101.

    Ibid.

  102. 102.

    Ibid, 7–8.

  103. 103.

    Bushell to Parsons, ‘Pakistan, India, and Nuclear Weapons’, April 29, 1979, TNA FCO96/953, 2.

  104. 104.

    Jimmy Carter, White House Diary (New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, 2010), 314; UKE Washington to FCO, ‘US/Indian Nuclear Discussions’, April 30, 1979, FCO96/953, 1.

  105. 105.

    ‘Testimony, Assistant Secretary Thomas R. Pickering, Subcommittee on Energy, Nuclear Proliferation and Federal Services’, May 1, 1979, TNA FCO96/953, 12; ‘Panel Told Pakistan Gained A-Weapons Ability By “End Runs”’, WP, May 2, 1979, A15.

  106. 106.

    Extract from US telegram, FCO to UKE Islamabad, ‘Pakistan Consortium Meeting 5–6 June’, June 8, 1979, TNA FCO96/955, 2.

  107. 107.

    UKE Washington to FCO, ‘Agha Shahi’s Talks in Washington’, May 8, 1979, TNA FCO96/954, 3.

  108. 108.

    State to USE New Delhi, ‘Non-proliferation in South Asia’, June 6, 1979, Wilson Center History and Public Policy Program Digital Archive (hereafter WCDA), http://digitalarchive.wilsoncenter.org/document/114198 (accessed September 9, 2013), 6–7.

  109. 109.

    Thornton to Brzezinski, ‘Minutes–May 23 PRC Meeting on Pakistan and Subcontinent Issues’, May 25, 1979, JCPL, RAC NLC-24-102-10-6-5, 4.

  110. 110.

    NIO for Nuclear Proliferation to Director of Central Intelligence, ‘Monthly Warning Report—Nuclear Proliferation’, July 24, 1979, USPQB, Doc.41, 2.

  111. 111.

    CIA, ‘Interagency Intelligence Memorandum: Iraq’s Nuclear Interests, Programs, and Options’, October 1, 1979, JCPL, RAC NLC-6-34-4-10-3, 10.

  112. 112.

    Begin to Thatcher, Letter, May 17, 1979, TNA FCO96/954.

  113. 113.

    ‘Pakistani Activity in the Nuclear Field’, appended to Begin to Thatcher, May 17, 1979.

  114. 114.

    Lever to Cartledge, ‘Pakistan’s Nuclear Programme’, May 22, 1979, TNA FCO96/954, 4.

  115. 115.

    Alston to Moberly, ‘Pakistan’s Nuclear Programme’, May 22, 1979, TNA FCO96/954; ‘Briefs for Quadripartite Ministerial Dinner in The Hague on 29 May’, May 22, 1979, TNA FCO37/2204.

  116. 116.

    Alston to Moberly, ‘Pakistan’s Nuclear Programme’, June 5, 1979, TNA FCO96/955, 1. This JIC report remains classified. The conclusions can be apprehended from Alston’s statements in his briefing.

  117. 117.

    ‘Pakistan Nuclear’, May 3, 1979, TNA FCO96/953, 2; FCO to UKE Washington et al., ‘Pakistan Nuclear: Publicity’, May 4, 1979, TNA FCO37/2203, 2.

  118. 118.

    Alston to Moberly, June 5, 1979.

  119. 119.

    Thatcher to Begin, Letter, June 19, 1979, FCO96/955, 1.

  120. 120.

    Ibid., 1–2.

  121. 121.

    ‘Note of a Conversation Between the Foreign and Commonwealth Secretary and Indian Foreign Minister in Lusaka’, August 3, 1979, TNA PREM19/155.

  122. 122.

    Carter to Clark, ‘Pakistan Nuclear’, May 24, 1979, FCO96/954; ‘UK/US Non-proliferation Bilateral, Pakistan Nuclear’, May 11, 1979, TNA FCO 96/953; ‘Call at FCO by Mr. T. Pickering’, May 14, 1979, TNA FCO96/953, 9–10.

  123. 123.

    UKE Paris to FCO, ‘Pakistan Nuclear’, May 17, 1979, TNA FCO 96/954, 1; Schmidt to Carter, Letter, May 21, 1979, DDRS, DDRS-272419-i1-4.

  124. 124.

    Pakenham to Alston, ‘US/Swiss Discussion on Argentina/Pakistan’, June 8, 1979, TNA FCO96/955, 1.

  125. 125.

    FCO to UKE Islamabad, ‘Pakistan Nuclear’, June 7, 1979, TNA FCO96/955.

  126. 126.

    UKE Islamabad to FCO, ‘Pakistan Nuclear’, July 23, 1979, TNA FCO96/957; New Delhi to FCO, ‘Pakistan Nuclear’, July 26, 1979, TNA FCO96/957.

  127. 127.

    FCO to UKE Vienna, ‘Pakistan Nuclear’, June 19, 1979, TNA FCO96/955.

  128. 128.

    UKE Washington to FCO, ‘Vienna Discussions on Pakistan’, June 25, 1979, TNA FCO96/956; FCO to UKE Vienna, ‘Pakistan Nuclear’, June 26, 1979, TNA FCO96/955.

  129. 129.

    UKE Vienna to FCO, ‘Informal Consultation on Pakistan’s Nuclear Weapon Activities’, June 27, 1979, TNA FCO96/956, 1, 4–5.

  130. 130.

    UKE Islamabad to FCO, ‘Pakistan Nuclear’, July 2, 1979, TNA FCO96/956, 1.

  131. 131.

    Ronald Reagan appointed Burt, a prominent critic of Carter, Director of the Bureau of Politico-Military Affairs in the State Department.

  132. 132.

    ‘U.S. Will Press Pakistan to halt A-Arms Project’, NYT, August 12, 1979, 1.

  133. 133.

    USE Islamabad to State, ‘Letter from President Zia-ul-Haq to President Carter’, August 14, 1979, JCPL, Records of the National Security Staff, Box 96 (hereafter RNSS96), Pakistan: Presidential Correspondence: 1-12/79. Within the Pakistani foreign service, the foreign secretary was the bureaucratic head of the ministry, while the foreign minister was diplomatic and executive head.

  134. 134.

    Zia to Carter, Letter, August 9, 1979, JCPL, RNSS96, Pakistan: Presidential Correspondence: 1-12/79, 2, 4.

  135. 135.

    Tarnoff to Brzezinski, ‘Letter of August 9 from President Zia of Pakistan to President Carter’, August 27, 1979, JCPL, RNSS96, Pakistan: Presidential Correspondence: 1-12/79, 1; Tarnoff to Brzezinski, ‘Response to Letter of August 9 and September 29 from President Zia of Pakistan to President Carter’, October 10, 1979, JCPL, RNSS96, Pakistan: Presidential Correspondence: 1-12/79; Zia to Carter, Letter, September 29, 1979, JCPL, RNSS96, Pakistan: Presidential Correspondence: 1-12/79, 2.

  136. 136.

    Fabian to Lavers, ‘Pakistan Nuclear’, July 30, 1979, TNA FCO 96/957, 1; Came to Gould, Untitled, July 30, 1979, TNA FCO37/2206.

  137. 137.

    Pakistan Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Press Release, August 14, 1979, TNA FCO96/958.

  138. 138.

    Fortescue to Holloway, ‘US/Pakistan’, August 14, 1979, TNA FCO96/958.

  139. 139.

    UKE Islamabad to FCO, ‘Pakistan Nuclear’, August 16, 1979, TNA FCO96/958, 1–2.

  140. 140.

    Ibid., 2.

  141. 141.

    Murray to Archer, Untitled, August 15, 1979, TNA FCO96/958, 2.

  142. 142.

    Forster to White, ‘Visit of British Parliamentarians’, September 23, 1979, TNA FCO96/959, 2.

  143. 143.

    General Advisory Committee on Arms Control and Disarmament, ‘Friday Morning Session’, September 14, 1979, USPQB, Doc.42, 12–13.

  144. 144.

    Ibid., 15. There is no clear evidence of whether or not the USA did actually formulate plans for military strikes on Pakistan. Corera argues—from uncited “private memos” and post-facto interviews—that the option had been suggested. These memos have not surfaced during archival research. See Gordon Corera, Shopping for Bombs: Nuclear Proliferation, Global Insecurity, and the Rise and Fall of the A. Q. Khan Network (London: Hurst and Co., 2006), 28.

  145. 145.

    Carter, White House Diary, 371.

  146. 146.

    Brzezinski, Power and Principle: Memoirs of the National Security Adviser, 19771981 (London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson, 1983), 484.

  147. 147.

    Gerges, America and Political Islam, 67.

  148. 148.

    Haqqani, Pakistan, 183.

  149. 149.

    Thomas Thornton, quoted in Kux, Disenchanted Allies, 245.

  150. 150.

    Thornton to Brzezinski, ‘Evening Report’, November 26, 1979, JCPL, RAC NLC-10-25-4-21-6, 2.

  151. 151.

    ‘Conclusions of a Meeting of the Cabinet Held at 10 Downing Street’, November 22, 1979, TNA CAB128/66, 2.

  152. 152.

    Asia Group Meeting, ‘Agenda Item 3(a): Pakistan’s Nuclear Weapons Development Programme’, December 13, 1979, TNA FCO37/2208, 4.

  153. 153.

    ‘Asia Group: Verbatim Report, December 13; Pakistan Nuclear Development Programme’, December 13, 1979, TNA FCO96/961, 2.

  154. 154.

    ‘Additional Advice for the Prime Minister: Nuclear Proliferation (Second Observer Article)’, December 18, 1979, TNA FCO96/961, 2.

  155. 155.

    Richard J. Aldrich and Rory Cormac, The Black Door: Spies, Secret Intelligence, and British Prime Ministers (London: William Collins, 2016), 359.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Craig, M.M. (2017). “A dream of nightmare proportions” The ‘Islamic bomb’ and the ‘Khan Affair’, January 1979 to December 1979. In: America, Britain and Pakistan’s Nuclear Weapons Programme, 1974-1980. Security, Conflict and Cooperation in the Contemporary World. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51880-0_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51880-0_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-51879-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-51880-0

  • eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics