Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Getting Rid of Hate Speech

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Free Speech and the State

  • 600 Accesses

Abstract

The author concludes with the topic of hate speech. This form of communication is unregulated in the Unites States, but most liberal democracies have introduced legislation that prohibits hate speech. The author examines whether hate speech fits with prominent justifications of speech and argues that it does not. He also scrutinises the recent arguments of Jeremy Waldron and David Boonin, who seem to offer very different perspectives on the issue. The author argues, however, that their arguments overlap significantly and suggests that both authors correctly conclude that harm prevention legitimises hate speech regulation. Neither Waldron nor Boonin think hate speech should be prevented because it causes offense, and the author offers a counter argument that allows for prohibition in this case as well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Alexander, Larry. 2005. Is There a Right of Freedom of Expression? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Altman, Andrew. 2012. “Freedom of Expression and Human Rights Law: The Case of Holocaust Denial.” In Speech and Harm: Controversies over Free Speech, eds. Ishani Maitra and Mary Kate McGowan, 24–49. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, C. Edwin. 2009. “Autonomy and Hate Speech.” In Extreme Speech and Democracy, eds. Ivan Hare and James Weinstein, 139–157. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Boonin, David. 2011. Should Race Matter? Unusual Answers to the Usual Questions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, Kevin. 2001. “Hate Speech: The United States versus the Rest of the World?” Maine Law Review 53(2): 488–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandis, George. 2014. http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-03-24/brandis-defends-right-to-be-a-bigot/5341552. Accessed September 12, 2016.

  • Brison, Susan. 1998. “The Autonomy Defence of Free Speech.” Ethics 108(2): 312–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delgado, Richard. 1993. “Words That Wound: A Tort Action for Racial Insults, Epithets, and Name Calling.” In Words that Wound: Critical Race Theory, Assaultive Speech and the First Amendment, eds. Mari J. Matsuda et al., 89–110. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, Andrea. 1981. Pornography: Men Possessing Women. London: The Women’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, Ronald. 2009. Foreword to Extreme Speech and Democracy, eds. Ivan Hare and James Weinstein, v–ix. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg, Joel. 1985. Offense to Others: The Moral Limits of the Criminal Law. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fish, Stanley. 1994. There’s No Such Thing as Free Speech…and It’s a Good Thing Too. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelber, Katharine. 2012. “‘Speaking Back’: The Likely Fate of Hate Speech Policy in the United States and Australia.” In Speech and Harm: Controversies over Free Speech, eds. Ishani Maitra and Mary Kate McGowan, 50–71. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gelber, Katharine, and McNamara Luke. 2016. “Anti-Vilification Laws and Public Racism in Australia: Mapping the Gaps between the Harms Occasioned and the Remedies Provided.” UNSW Law Journal 39(2): 488–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo, G. et al. 2014. “Recognizing a Small Amount of Superficial Genetic Differences Across African, European and Asian Americans Helps Understand Social Construction of Race.” Demography 51(6): 2337–2342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haworth, Alan. 1998. Free Speech. Routledge: London.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, Friedrich. 1960. The Constitution of Liberty. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langton, Rae. 1993. “Speech Acts and Unspeakable Acts.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 22(4): 293–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langton, Rae, and Caroline West. 1999. “Scorekeeping in a Pornographic Language Game.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 77(3): 303–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, Charles. 1993. “If He Hollers Let Him Go: Regulating Racist Speech on Campus.” In Words that Wound: Critical Race Theory, Assaultive Speech and the First Amendment, eds. Mari J. Matsuda et al., 53–88. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, Catharine. 1987. Feminism Unmodified. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1995. Only Words. London: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maitra, Ishani and Mary Kate McGowan. 2012. Speech and Harm: Controversies Over Free Speech. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsuda Mari, J. 1993. “Public Response to Racist Speech: Considering the Victim’s Story.” In Words that Wound: Critical Race Theory, Assaultive Speech and the First Amendment, eds. Mari J. Matsuda et al., 17–51. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J. S. 1974. On Liberty. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, Laura Beth. 2012. “Power in Public: Reactions, Responses, and Resistance to Offensive Public Speech.” In Speech and Harm: Controversies over Free Speech, eds. Ishani Maitra and Mary Kate McGowan, 148–173. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Public Order Offenses Act. 1986. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1986/64. Accessed September 5 2016.

  • Sunstein, C. 1995. Democracy and the Problem of Free Speech. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tirrell, Lynne. 2012. “Genocidal Language Games.” In Speech and Harm: Controversies over Free Speech, eds. Ishani Maitra and Mary Kate McGowan, 174–221. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trump, D. 2015. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/wp/2015/07/08/donald-trumps-false-comments-connecting-mexican-immigrants-and-crime/. Accessed August 27, 2016.

  • Waldron, Jeremy. 2012. The Harm in Hate Speech. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • West, Caroline. 2012. “Words That Silence? Freedom of Expression and Racist Hate Speech.” In Speech and Harm: Controversies Over Free Speech, eds. Ishani Maitra and Mary Kate McGowan, 222–248. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Western Australia, Nedlands, West Australia, Australia

    David van Mill

Authors
  1. David van Mill
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

van Mill, D. (2017). Getting Rid of Hate Speech. In: Free Speech and the State. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51635-6_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation