Skip to main content

Creating an Innovative Mobility Ecosystem for Urban Planning Areas

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Disrupting Mobility

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Mobility ((LNMOB))

Abstract

Urban planning, infrastructure design, and mobility policy are up against a tough system-level challenge: the rapid adaptation of shared mobility. The new mobility is destabilizing the current auto-oriented transportation paradigm, and gradually moving toward a new mobility ecosystem. In order to capture the potential and create shared infrastructure, an innovative mobility planning model based on a scientific approach was developed to identify context-sensitive area solutions and the scaling of the proposed ecosystem for short- and long-term horizons. The aim of this model is to build capacities and competencies, enable municipal authority and system planners to quantify the scale and cost, and accurately model the potential impact and benefits of various innovative mobility strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Heikkilä, S.: Mobility as a service—a proposal for action for the public administration: case Helsinki. Master’s Thesis, Aalto University (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Little, A.: The future of urban mobility 2.0: towards networked, multimodal cities of 2050. International Association of Public Transport (UITP) (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cohen, B., Kietzmann, J.: Ride On! Mobility Business Models for the Sharing Economy, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 279–296. SAGE Publications (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Schwab, K.: The Fourth Industrial Revolution: What It Means, How to Respond, World Economic Forum, Global Agenda, Jan 14, 2016

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ausubel, J.H.: The Evolution of Transport, The Industrial Physicist, American Institute of Physics, vol. April/May, 20–24, 2001

    Google Scholar 

  6. ITDP and EMBARQ: The Life and Death of Urban Highways, Mar 13, 2012

    Google Scholar 

  7. ITDP: Europe’s Parking U-Turn: From Accommodation to Regulation, Jan 11, 2011

    Google Scholar 

  8. Government of Ontario: Places to Grow Act, Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Listokin, D., Voicu, I., Dolphin, W., Camp, M., Jay, D., Leavey, M., Sherry, J.: Infill development standards and policy guide. Center for Urban Policy Research, Rutgers University for New Jersey, Department of Community Affairs, April 2007

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jackson, T.: Prosperity without Growth: Economics for a Finite Planet. Routledge, June 2011

    Google Scholar 

  11. Steffen, W., Richardson, K., Rockström, J., Cornell, S., Fetzer, I., Bennett, E., Biggs, R., Carpenter, S., Vries, W., Wit, C., Folke, C., Gerten, D., Heinke, J., Mace, G., Persson, L., Ramanathan, V., Reyers, B., Sörlin, S.: Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet. Science 15, 1–10 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Shared Use Mobility: Reference Guide. Shared-use Mobility Center (SUMC), Chicago (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Doctoroff, D.: Panel Discussion, Disrupting Mobility Summit. Google Sidewalk Lab, Cambridge, USA (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Alexander, L.P., González, M.C.: Assessing the impact of real-time ridesharing on urban traffic using mobile phone data. 4th International Workshop on Urban Computing, Sydney, Australia, Aug 10, 2015

    Google Scholar 

  15. Manyika, J., Chui, M., Bisson, P., Woetzel, J., Dobbs, R., Bughin, J., Aharon, D.: Unlocking the Potential of the Internet of Things. McKinsey Global Institute, June 2015

    Google Scholar 

  16. Berg, P.: The Finite Planet: How Resource Scarcity Will Affect Our Environment, Economy and Energy Supply, Create Space Independent Publishing Platform, Sept 16, 2011

    Google Scholar 

  17. Priemus, H.: The network approach: Dutch spatial planning between substratum and infrastructure networks. Eur. Plan. Stud. 15(5), 667–686 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Forman, R.: Urban Ecology: Science of Cities. Cambridge University Press (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zielinski, S.: New Mobility: The Next Generation of Sustainable Urban Transportation, The Bridge—Linking Engineering and Society, vol. 36, no. 4. National Academy of Engineering, Winter 2006

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ohta, K.: TDM measures toward sustainable mobility. IATSS Res. 22(1) (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Strompen, F., Litman, T., Bongardt, D.: Reducing carbon emissions through transport demand management strategies: a review of international examples. Final report, GIZ China, Transport Demand Management in Beijing, 2012

    Google Scholar 

  22. City of Toronto: For a Healthy, Equitable, Prosperous Toronto (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Weichenthal, S., Ryswyk, K., Goldstein, A., Shekarrizfard, M., Hatzopoulou, M.: Characterizing the spatial distribution of ambient ultrafine particles in Toronto, Canada: a land-use regression model. Environ. Pollut. 47(PT A), 1–8 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Millard-Ball, A.: Do city climate plans reduce emissions? J. Urban Econ. 71(3), 289–311 (2011). Elsevier

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Weitman, M.: A review of the stern review on the economics of climate change. J. Econ. Lit. XLV, 703–724 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  26. World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Oxford University Press (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  27. WHO: Health Impact Assessment: Promoting Health Across All Sectors of Activity. World Health Organization (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Anderson, J., Weiland, C., Muench, S.: Green Roads Manual, Version 1.5. University of Washington (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  29. EPA: Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990–2011, Chapter 3 (Energy), Tables 3-12, 3-13, and 3-14, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. U.S., EPA #430-R-13-001 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  30. University of Toronto: Transportation Tomorrow Survey (TTS) (1985–2011)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Millard-Ball, A., Schipper, L.: Are we reaching peak travel? Trends in passenger transport in eight industrialized countries. Transp. Rev. 31(3), 357–378 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Sustainable Urban Infrastructure: Vienna Edition—Role Model for Complete Mobility, Siemens Mobility, 2015

    Google Scholar 

  33. Botsman, B.: What’s mine is yours: the rise of collaborative consumption. Harper Bus. (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Litman, T.: Can smart growth policies conserve energy and reduce emissions? Cent. Real Estate Q. J. (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Gordon, D., Janzen, M.: Suburban nation? Estimating the size of Canada’s suburban population. J. Archit. Planning Res. 30(3), 197–220 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Gately, C., Hutyra, L., Wing, I.: Cities, traffic, and CO2: a multidecadal assessment of trends, drivers, and scaling relationships. PNAS 112(16), 4999–5004 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  37. McCahill, C., Garrick, N., Atkinson-Palombo, C., Polinski, A.: Effects of parking provision on automobile use in cities: inferring causality. Transp. Res. Board (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Mehaffy, M., Porta, S., Rofe, Y., Salingaros, N.: Urban nuclei and the geometry of streets: the emergent neighbourhoods model. Urban Des. Int. 15(1), 22–46 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Barthelemy, M., Flamini, A.: Modeling urban streets patterns. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 138702 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Al Mamun, M., Lownes, N.: A composite index of public transit accessibility. J. Public Transp. 14(2) (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  41. City of London: Measuring Public Transport Accessibility Levels: PTALs—Summary, Transport for London, April 2010

    Google Scholar 

  42. Santi, P., Resta, G., Szell, M., Sobolevsky, S., Strogatz, S., Ratti, C.: Quantifying the benefits of vehicle pooling with shareability networks. PNAS 111(37), 13290–13294 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Watkins, K., Ferris, B., Borning, A., Rutherford, G., Layton, D.: Where is my bus? Impact of mobile real-time information on the perceived and actual wait time of transit riders. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 45(8), 839–848 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Tang, L., Thakuriah, P.: Ridership effects of real-time bus information system: a case study in the city of Chicago. Transp. Res. Part C 22, 146–161 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Brakewood, C., Macfarlane, G., Watkins, K.: The impact of real-time information on bus ridership in New York City. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 53, 59–75 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Caywood, M., Cochran, A., Schade, M.: Urban Mobility Score: Quantifying Multimodal Transportation Access. Disrupting Mobility Summit, Cambridge MIT (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Dumbaugh, E., Rae, R.: Revisiting the relationship between community design and traffic safety. J. Am. Plann. Assoc. 75(3), 309–329 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Van Schagen, I., Janssen, T.: Managing road transport risks: sustainable safety in the Netherlands, risk management in transport. IATSS Res. 24(2), 18–27 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Luoma, J., Sivak, M.: Why is road safety in the U.S. not on par with Sweden, the U.K., and the Netherlands? Lessons to be learned. Report no. UMTRI -2013-1, University of Michigan Transportation Institute, January 2013

    Google Scholar 

  50. Welle, B., Liu, Q., Li, W., Adriazolasteil, C., King, R., Sarmiento, C., Obelheiro, M.: Cities Safer by Design: Guidance and Examples to Promote Traffic Safety through Urban and Street Design, Version 1.0, World Resources Institute (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Karim, D.: Narrower Lanes, Safer Streets, Canadian Institute of Transportation Engineers, Annual Conference, Regina, Saskachewan (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Fitzpatrick, K., Schneider, I.V., William, H.: Turn Speeds and Crashes within Right-turn Lane, Report 0-4365-4, Texas Transportation Institute (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Marshall, W.E., Garrick, N.W.: Evidence on why bike-friendly cities are safer for all road users. Environ. Pract. 13(1) (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Elvik, R.: The non-linearity of risk and the promotion of environmentally sustainable transport. Accid. Anal. Prev. 41, 849–855 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Robertson, L.: Transforming our Cities to Foster Responsive, Affordable Mobility: Lessons from Detroit and Berlin, UN High Level Dialogue on Sustainable Cities and Transport, Berlin (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  56. Transport Canada: Complete Streets: Making Canada’s Roads Safer for All (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  57. Hauer, E.: A Case for Evidence-Based Road-Safety Delivery, AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  58. Lovegrove, G., Sayed, T.: Using Macro-Level Collision Prediction Models in Road Safety Planning Applications, Transportation Research Record No 1950, August 2006, pp. 73–82 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  59. City of London: The London Plan: Review of Official Plan (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  60. Jones, P., Boujenko, N., Marshall, S.: Link and Place: A Guide to Street Planning and Design. Landor Press, London (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  61. Andrés, D., Chellman, C., Hall, R., Swift, P.: Smart Code Module, Center for Transect Studies. Duany Plater-Zyberk & Co., Version 2.0 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  62. Musci, K., Khan, A.M.: Effectiveness of additional lanes at signalized intersections. ITE J. 26–30 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  63. Dizikes, P.: New approaches to urban infrastructure. Conference at the Center for Advanced Urbanism, Plan 88: Article, MIT News Office (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  64. Yevdokimov, Y., Mao, H.: A systems approach to measuring sustainability of transportation. Proceedings of the International Conference on Transportation Systems Planning and Operation, pp. 519–528. Chennai, India, Allied Publishers Pvt. Ltd., 18–20 February, 2004

    Google Scholar 

  65. Criterion Planners/Engineers Inc.: Smart Growth Index: A Sketch Tool for Community Planning, Version 2.0, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  66. Bochner, B., Hooper, K., Sperry, B., Dunphy, R.: Enhancing Internal Trip Capture Estimation for Mixed-Use Developments, NCHRP Report 684, Transportation Research Board, Washington D.C. (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  67. Kenchappagoudra, M.: Estimation of Person and Multimodal Trips Using Baselines Site Trip Generation Data, Transoft Solutions Inc. (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  68. IDTP: The Bikeshare Planning Guide, Institute for Transportation and Development Policy, New York (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  69. Rayle, L., Shaheen, S., Chan, N., Dai, D., Cervero, R.: App-based, On-demand Ride Services: Comparing Taxi and Ridesourcing Trips and User Characteristics in San Francisco, University of California Transportation Center, UCTC-FR-2014-08 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  70. Shaheen, S., Martin, E.: Unravelling the modal impacts of bikesharing. Access 47 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  71. Ewing, R.: Traffic Generated by MXD: New Prediction Methods Ahead, Planning: The Magazine of the American Planning Association (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  72. Arrington, G.B., Cervero, R.: Effects of TOD on Housing, Parking, and Travel, Transit Cooperative Research Progra, TCRP Report 128, Transportation Research Board (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  73. Steiner, R., Bond, A.: Future Directions for Multimodal Areawide Level-of-Service Handbook Research and Development, Florida Department of Transportation (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  74. Smith, J., Heath, L., Nichols, M.: U.S. Forest Carbon Calculation Tool User’s Guide: Forestland Carbon Stocks and Net Annual Stock Change. General Technical Report NRS-13 revised, U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Northern Research Station (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  75. IPCC: IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva, Switzerland (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  76. Berg, S.B.: Multimodal mobility concepts: development opportunities for public services in public transport with special consideration of sustainable mobility objectives. Unpublished thesis, Cologne (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  77. MO.Point., Wo Mobilität zu Hause ist., MO.Point Mobilitätsservices GmbH (i.G.) (2016)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the City of Toronto or other cities where the “Mobility Ecosystem” framework was applied.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dewan Masud Karim .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Karim, D.M. (2017). Creating an Innovative Mobility Ecosystem for Urban Planning Areas. In: Meyer, G., Shaheen, S. (eds) Disrupting Mobility. Lecture Notes in Mobility. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51602-8_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51602-8_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-51601-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-51602-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics