Skip to main content

Measurement of Development: Predecessors of the Human Development Index

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Creation of the Human Development Approach
  • 412 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter examines nine well-known composite indices created in the past to determine their lessons and to identify the added-value of the HDI. The conceptual investigation covers the identification of development approaches and institutions supporting each index. The operational investigation covers the selection of dimensions and variables, the methods of transformation and standardisation, and various weighting systems. It turns out that the HDI has shared most operational features with the past indices. Although nothing could be seen as its direct predecessor, some commonalities exist in most of them sporadically. Nevertheless, two original advantages of the HDI can be identified: the inclusion and treatment of income as a variable, and the possibility to make explicit the value judgement behind the index.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alkire, S. (2002). Valuing freedoms: Sen’s capability approach and poverty reduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, R. (1966). Social indicators. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayless, M., & Bayless, S. (1982). Current quality of life indicators: Some theoretical and methodological concerns. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 41(4), 421–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, M. K. (1937). On measurement of relative national standards of living. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1937, 317–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carchedi, G. (1972). Cultural biasses and levels of living indices. De Economist, 120(6), 550–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carley, M. (1981). Social measurement and social indicators: Issues of policy and theory. London: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drewnowski, J. (1972). Social indicators and welfare measurement: Remarks on methodology. In N. Baster (Ed.), Measuring development: The role and adequacy of development indicators (pp. 77–89). London: Frank Cass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drewnowski, J. (1973–4). Frustrated development. Development and Change, 5(2), 101–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drewnowski, J. (1974). On measuring and planning the quality of life. The Hague: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drewnowski, J. (1977). Poverty: Its meaning and measurement. Development and Change, 8(2), 183–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drewnowski, J. (1978). The affluence line. Social Indicators Research, 5, 263–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drewnowski, J., & Scott, W. (1966). The level of living index. Geneva: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, G. F. R. (1985). An overall framework for quality of life evaluation schemes with application to the Ciskei (South Africa). In J. G. M. Hilhorst & M. Klatter (Eds.), Social development in the third world: The level of living indicators and social planning (pp. 63–90). London: Published in co-operation with the Institute of Social Studies at the Hague [by] Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallup, G. H. (1976). Human needs and satisfactions: A global survey. Public Opinion Quarterly, 40(4), 459–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gasper, D. (2002). Is Sen’s capability approach an adequate basis for considering human development? Review of Political Economy, 14(4), 435–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gasper, D. (2004). The ethics of development: From economism to human development. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gasper, D. (2007). What is the capability approach? Its core, rationale, partners and dangers. Journal of Socio-Economics, 36, 335–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gasper, D. (2011). Pioneering the human development revolution: Analysing the trajectory of Mahbub ul Haq. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 12(3), 433–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillingham, R., & Reece, W. S. (1980). Analytical problems in the measurement of the quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 7, 91–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, J. P. (1981). A new way of measuring progress in living standards. World Health Forum, 2(3), 373–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harbison, F., & Myers, C. A. (1964). Education, manpower, and economic growth: Strategies of human resource development. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, N., & Streeten, P. (1979). Indicators of development: The search for a basic needs yardstick. World Development, 7, 567–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuznets, S. (1959). Six lectures on economic growth. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, D. A., & Wilford, W. T. (1979). The physical quality of life index: A useful social indicator? World Development, 7, 581–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liser, F. B. (1977). Statistical annexes. In J. W. Sewell (Ed.), The United States and world development: Agenda 1977 (pp. 143–246). New York: Praeger for the Overseas Development Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liser, F. B. (1979). Statistical annexes. In M. M. McLaughlin (Ed.), The United States and world development: Agenda 1979 (pp. 125–264). New York: Praeger for the Overseas Development Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, B.-C. (1975). Quality of life: Concept, measure and results. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 34(1), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, B.-C. 1976. Quality of life indicators in the U.S. metropolitan areas: A statistical analysis. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luetkenhorst, W. (1982). Operationalising basic needs: A few fundamental reflections. Intereconomics, 17(5), 244–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGranahan, D. V., Richard-Proust, C., Sovani, N. V., & Subramanian, M. (1972). Contents and measurement of socioeconomic development: A staff study of the United Nations Research Institute for Social Development. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, D. M. (1979). Measuring the condition of the world’s poor. New York: Pergamon for the Overseas Development Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naroll, R. (1983). The moral order: An introduction to the human situation. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schutz, T. W. (1961). Investment in human capital. The American Economic Review, 51(1), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seers, D. (1972). What are we trying to measure? In N. Baster (Ed.), Measuring development: The role and adequacy of development indicators (pp. 21–36). London: Frank Cass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidman, D. (1977). Book review: Quality of life indicators in U.S. metropolitan areas: A statistical analysis by B-C. Liu. Social Indicators Research, 4, 97–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. (1980). Description as choice. Oxford Economic Papers, 32(3), 353–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. (1997). Development thinking at the beginning of the XXI century. In L. Emmerij (Ed.), Economic and social development into the XXI century (pp. 531–551). Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinden, J. A. (1982). Application of quality of life indicators to socioeconomic problems: An extension of Liu’s method to evaluate policies for 26 Australian towns. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 41(4), 401–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. M. (1973). The geography of social well-being in the United States: An introduction to territorial social indicators. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streeten, P. (1981). Development perspectives. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Streeten, P. (1994). Human development: Means and ends. The American Economic Review, 84(2), 232–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (UN). (1954). Report on International Definition and Measurement of Standards and Levels of Living, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN. (1964). Yearbook of the United Nations 1964, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP. (1990–2015). Human Development Report, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, T. G., & Carayannis, T. (2005). Ideas matter: Voices from the United Nations. Forum for Development Studies, 1-2005, 243–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hirai, T. (2017). Measurement of Development: Predecessors of the Human Development Index. In: The Creation of the Human Development Approach. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51568-7_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics