Skip to main content

Institutionalisation of Development Concepts

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Creation of the Human Development Approach

Abstract

This chapter reveals that institutions are vital to frame development concepts and to keep them influential against counterpart concepts. At the same time, they are likely to skew development concepts as well and, consequently, similar concepts result in different outcomes in respective institutions. To demonstrate these issues, three different moments of institutionalisation of development concepts are featured: the economic growth model by the Bretton Woods Institutions (BWIs), the basic needs approach by the International Labour Organization (ILO) and later the World Bank, and the human development approach within the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). It leads to the conclusion that the current position of human development seems greatly attributed to a good match between the concept and the unique institutional features of the UNDP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alkire, S. (2002). Valuing freedoms: Sen’s capability approach and poverty reduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Arndt, H. W. (1987). Economic development: The history of an idea. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bøås, M., & McNeill, D. (2004a). Ideas and institutions: Who is framing what? In M. Bøås & D. McNeill (Eds.), Global institutions and development: Framing the world? (pp. 206–224). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bøås, M., & McNeill, D. (2004b). Introduction. In M. Bøås & D. McNeill (Eds.), Global institutions and development: Framing the world? (pp. 1–12). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowen, M. P., & Shenton, R. W. (1995). The invention of development. In D. Gasper & A. L. St Clair (Eds.), Development ethics (pp. 3–21). Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmerij, L., Jolly, R., & Weiss, T. G. (2001). Ahead of the curve?: UN ideas and global challenges. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Escobar, A. (1997). The making and unmaking of the third world through development. In M. Rahnema & V. Bawtree (Eds.), The post-development reader (pp. 85–93). London: Zed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esteva, G. (1992). Development. In W. Sachs (Ed.), The development dictionary: A guide to knowledge as power (pp. 6–25). London: Zed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, B. (2006). The new development economics. In K. S. Jomo & B. Fine (Eds.), The new development economics after the Washington Consensus (pp. 1–20). London: Zed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gasper, D. (2006). What is the point of development ethics? Éthique et économique/Ethics and Economics, 4(2), 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gasper, D. (2004). The ethics of development: From economism to human development. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gasper, D. (2011). Pioneering the human development revolution: Analysing the trajectory of Mahbub ul Haq. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 12(3), 433–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gasper, D. (2008a). Denis Goulet and the project of development ethics: Choices in methodology, focus and organization. Journal of Human Development, 9, 453–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gasper, D. (2008b). From “Hume’s Law” to problem- and policy-analysis for human development. Sen after Dewey, Myrdal, Streeten. Stretton and Haq. Review of Political Economy, 20(2), 233–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goulet, D. (1971a). An ethical model for the study of values. Harvard Educational Review, 41(2), 205–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goulet, D. (1971b). The cruel choice: A new concept in the theory of development. New York: Atheneum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, E. B. (1990). When knowledge is power: Three models of change in international organizations. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hands, D. W., & Mirowski, P. (1998). Harold Hotelling and the neoclassical dream. In R. E. Backhouse, D. M. Hausman, U. Maki, & A. Salanti (Eds.), Economics and methodology: Crossing boundaries—Proceedings of the IEA Conference held in Bergamo, Italy (pp. 322–397). Basingstoke: Macmillan in association with the International Economic Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haq, K., & Jolly, R. (2008). Global development, poverty alleviation, and north-south relations. In K. Haq & R. Ponzio (Eds.), Pioneering the human development revolution: An intellectual biography of Mahbub ul Haq (pp. 63–87). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haq, K., & Kirdar, Ü. (Eds.). (1986). Human development: The neglected dimension. Islamabad: North South Roundtable.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haq, M. U. (1976). The poverty curtain: Choices for the third world. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haq, M. U. (1989a). Human dimension in development. Journal of Development Planning, 19, 249–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haq, M. U. (1989b). United Nations role in human development. Development, 89(4), 41–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haq, M. U. (1995a). A new framework for development cooperation. In M. U. Haq, R. Jolly, P. Streeten, & K. Haq (Eds.), The UN and the Bretton Woods Institutions: New challenges for the twenty-first century (pp. 239–245). Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Haq, M. U. (1995b). Reflections on human development: How the focus of development economics shifted from national income accounting to people-centred policies told by one of the chief architects of the new paradigm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haq, M. U. (1995c). The vision and the reality. In M. U. Haq, R. Jolly, P. Streeten, & K. Haq (Eds.), The UN and the Bretton Woods Institutions: New challenges for the twenty-first century (pp. 26–33). Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Haq, M. U., Jolly, R., Streeten, P., & Haq, K. (1995). Overview. In M. U. Haq, R. Jolly, P. Streeten, & K. Haq (Eds.), The UN and the Bretton Woods Institutions: New challenges for the twenty-first Century (pp. 3–14). Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jahan, S. (2002). Evolution of the Human Development Index. In S. Fukuda-Parr & A. K. Shiva Kumar (Eds.), Readings in human development (pp. 152–163). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolly, R. (1985). Adjustment with a human face. Development: Seeds of Change, 4, 83–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolly, R. (1989a). Restoring momentum for human development in the 1990s. Journal of Development Planning, 19, 259–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolly, R. (2005). The UN and development thinking and practice. Forum for Development Studies, 1-2005, 49–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jolly, R. (2007). Society for International Development, the North-South Roundtable and the power of ideas. Development, 50(S1), 47–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jolly, R. (2014). UNICEF (United Nations Children’s Fund): Global governance that works. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolly, R., Emmerij, L., Ghai, D., & Lapeyre, F. (2004). UN contributions to development thinking and practice. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolly, R., Emmerij, L., & Weiss, T. G. (2009). UN ideas that changes the world. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirdar, Ü. (1984a). An overview. In K. Haq (Ed.), Crisis of the ‘80s (pp. 199–207). Washington, DC: North South Roundtable.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirdar, Ü. (1984b). Impact of IMF conditionality on human conditions. In K. Haq & C. Massad (Eds.), Adjustment with growth: A search for an equitable solution (pp. 229–242). Islamabad: North South Roundtable.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirdar, Ü. (1986). International institutions and human development: A critique. In K. Haq & Ü. Kirdar (Eds.), Human development: The neglected dimension (pp. 421–436). Islamabad: North South Roundtable.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirdar, Ü. (1989). A review of past strategies. In K. Haq & Ü. Kirdar (Eds.), Development for people: Goals and strategies for the year 2000 (pp. 181–200). Islamabad: North South Roundtable.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeill, D. (2007). Human development: The power of the idea. Journal of Human Development, 8(1), 5–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNeill, D., & Clair, A. L. (2009). Global poverty, ethics and human rights: The role of multilateral organisations. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirowski, P. (1990a). The philosophical bases of institutionalist economics. In D. Lavoie (Ed.), Economics and hermeneutics (pp. 76–112). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirowski, P. (1990b). The rhetoric of economics. History of the Human Sciences, 3(2), 244–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirowski, P. (2002). Machine dreams: Economics becomes a cyborg science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirowski, P. (2005a). A revisionist’s view of the history of economic thought. Change, 48(5), 79–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirowski, P. (2005b). How positivism made a pact with the postwar social sciences in the United States. In G. Steinmetz (Ed.), The politics of method in the human sciences: Positivism and its epistemological others (pp. 142–172). Durham: Duke University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mirowski, P. (2006). Twelve theses concerning the history of postwar neoclassical price theory. In P. Mirowski & D. W. Hands (Eds.), Agreement on demand: Consumer theory in the twentieth century—Annual supplement to, History of political economy (Vol. 38, pp. 343–379). Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirowski, P., & Hands, D. W. (1998). A paradox of budgets: The postwar stabilization of American neoclassical demand theory. In M. S. Morgan & M. Rutherfold (Eds.), From interwar pluralism to postwar neoclassicism (pp. 260–292). Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, M. S., & Rutherfold, M. (1998). American economics: The character of the transformation. In M. S. Morgan & M. Rutherfold (Eds.), From interwar pluralism to postwar neoclassicism – Annual supplement to, History of political economy (Vol. 30, pp. 1–26). Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, C. (2006). The United Nations Development Programme: A better way? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • North South Roundtable (NSRT) & UNDP. (1983, August 29–September 1). Statement from Istanbul: A report on the Istanbul Roundtable on world monetary, financial and human resource development issues. Istanbul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponzio, R. (2008). The advent of the Human Development Report. In K. Haq & R. Ponzio (Eds.), Pioneering the human development revolution: An intellectual biography of Mahbub ul Haq (pp. 88–111). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahnema, M. (1997a). Introduction. In M. Rahnema & V. Bawtree (Eds.), The post-development reader (pp. ix–xix). London: Zed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahnema, M. (1997b). Towards post-development: Searching for signposts, a new language and new paradigms. In M. Rahnema & V. Bawtree (Eds.), The post-development reader (pp. 377–403). London: Zed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rist, G. (1997). The history of development: From western origins to global faith. London: Zed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. (1989). Development as capabilities expansion. Journal of Development Planning, 19, 41–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. (1997). Development thinking at the beginning of the XXI century. In L. Emmerij (Ed.), Economic and social development into the XXI century (pp. 531–551). Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. K. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, H. (1995). An historical perspective. In M. U. Haq, R. Jolly, P. Streeten, & K. Haq (Eds.), The UN and the Bretton Woods Institutions: New challenges for the twenty-first century (pp. 17–25). Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • St Clair, A. L. (2004). The role of ideas in the United Nations Development Programme. In M. Bøås & D. McNeill (Eds.), Global institutions and development: Framing the world? (pp. 178–192). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • St Clair, A. L. (2007). A methodologically pragmatist approach to development ethics. Journal of Global Ethics, 3, 141–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN. (1970). Yearbook of the United Nations 1970, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN. (1976). Yearbook of the United Nations 1976, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN. (1980). Yearbook of the United Nations 1980, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (1967–74). Pre-Investment News, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP. (1974–86). Report of the Administrator, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP. (1975). Commitment, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP. (1975–77). Action UNDP, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP. (1987–89). UNDP World Development Annual Report, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP. (1988–92). World Development, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP. (1990–91). UNDP Annual Report: World development, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP. (1992–2009). UNDP Annual Report, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade, R. H. (2001a). Making the World Development Report 2000: Attacking poverty. World Development, 29(8), 1435–1441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wade, R. H. (2001b). Showdown at the World Bank. New Left Review, 7(January/February), 124–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade, R. H. (2002). US hegemony and the World Bank: The fight over people and ideas. Review of International Political Economy, 9(2), 201–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, T. G., & Carayannis, T. (2005). Ideas matter: Voices from the United Nations. Forum for Development Studies, 1-2005, 243–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (1980). World Development Report 1980. DC: Washington.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hirai, T. (2017). Institutionalisation of Development Concepts. In: The Creation of the Human Development Approach. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51568-7_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics