Abstract
This chapter reveals that institutions are vital to frame development concepts and to keep them influential against counterpart concepts. At the same time, they are likely to skew development concepts as well and, consequently, similar concepts result in different outcomes in respective institutions. To demonstrate these issues, three different moments of institutionalisation of development concepts are featured: the economic growth model by the Bretton Woods Institutions (BWIs), the basic needs approach by the International Labour Organization (ILO) and later the World Bank, and the human development approach within the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). It leads to the conclusion that the current position of human development seems greatly attributed to a good match between the concept and the unique institutional features of the UNDP.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alkire, S. (2002). Valuing freedoms: Sen’s capability approach and poverty reduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Arndt, H. W. (1987). Economic development: The history of an idea. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bøås, M., & McNeill, D. (2004a). Ideas and institutions: Who is framing what? In M. Bøås & D. McNeill (Eds.), Global institutions and development: Framing the world? (pp. 206–224). London: Routledge.
Bøås, M., & McNeill, D. (2004b). Introduction. In M. Bøås & D. McNeill (Eds.), Global institutions and development: Framing the world? (pp. 1–12). London: Routledge.
Cowen, M. P., & Shenton, R. W. (1995). The invention of development. In D. Gasper & A. L. St Clair (Eds.), Development ethics (pp. 3–21). Farnham: Ashgate.
Emmerij, L., Jolly, R., & Weiss, T. G. (2001). Ahead of the curve?: UN ideas and global challenges. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Escobar, A. (1997). The making and unmaking of the third world through development. In M. Rahnema & V. Bawtree (Eds.), The post-development reader (pp. 85–93). London: Zed.
Esteva, G. (1992). Development. In W. Sachs (Ed.), The development dictionary: A guide to knowledge as power (pp. 6–25). London: Zed.
Fine, B. (2006). The new development economics. In K. S. Jomo & B. Fine (Eds.), The new development economics after the Washington Consensus (pp. 1–20). London: Zed.
Gasper, D. (2006). What is the point of development ethics? Éthique et économique/Ethics and Economics, 4(2), 1–30.
Gasper, D. (2004). The ethics of development: From economism to human development. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Gasper, D. (2011). Pioneering the human development revolution: Analysing the trajectory of Mahbub ul Haq. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 12(3), 433–456.
Gasper, D. (2008a). Denis Goulet and the project of development ethics: Choices in methodology, focus and organization. Journal of Human Development, 9, 453–474.
Gasper, D. (2008b). From “Hume’s Law” to problem- and policy-analysis for human development. Sen after Dewey, Myrdal, Streeten. Stretton and Haq. Review of Political Economy, 20(2), 233–256.
Goulet, D. (1971a). An ethical model for the study of values. Harvard Educational Review, 41(2), 205–227.
Goulet, D. (1971b). The cruel choice: A new concept in the theory of development. New York: Atheneum.
Haas, E. B. (1990). When knowledge is power: Three models of change in international organizations. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Hands, D. W., & Mirowski, P. (1998). Harold Hotelling and the neoclassical dream. In R. E. Backhouse, D. M. Hausman, U. Maki, & A. Salanti (Eds.), Economics and methodology: Crossing boundaries—Proceedings of the IEA Conference held in Bergamo, Italy (pp. 322–397). Basingstoke: Macmillan in association with the International Economic Association.
Haq, K., & Jolly, R. (2008). Global development, poverty alleviation, and north-south relations. In K. Haq & R. Ponzio (Eds.), Pioneering the human development revolution: An intellectual biography of Mahbub ul Haq (pp. 63–87). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Haq, K., & Kirdar, Ü. (Eds.). (1986). Human development: The neglected dimension. Islamabad: North South Roundtable.
Haq, M. U. (1976). The poverty curtain: Choices for the third world. New York: Columbia University Press.
Haq, M. U. (1989a). Human dimension in development. Journal of Development Planning, 19, 249–258.
Haq, M. U. (1989b). United Nations role in human development. Development, 89(4), 41–45.
Haq, M. U. (1995a). A new framework for development cooperation. In M. U. Haq, R. Jolly, P. Streeten, & K. Haq (Eds.), The UN and the Bretton Woods Institutions: New challenges for the twenty-first century (pp. 239–245). Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Haq, M. U. (1995b). Reflections on human development: How the focus of development economics shifted from national income accounting to people-centred policies told by one of the chief architects of the new paradigm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Haq, M. U. (1995c). The vision and the reality. In M. U. Haq, R. Jolly, P. Streeten, & K. Haq (Eds.), The UN and the Bretton Woods Institutions: New challenges for the twenty-first century (pp. 26–33). Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Haq, M. U., Jolly, R., Streeten, P., & Haq, K. (1995). Overview. In M. U. Haq, R. Jolly, P. Streeten, & K. Haq (Eds.), The UN and the Bretton Woods Institutions: New challenges for the twenty-first Century (pp. 3–14). Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Jahan, S. (2002). Evolution of the Human Development Index. In S. Fukuda-Parr & A. K. Shiva Kumar (Eds.), Readings in human development (pp. 152–163). New York: Oxford University Press.
Jolly, R. (1985). Adjustment with a human face. Development: Seeds of Change, 4, 83–87.
Jolly, R. (1989a). Restoring momentum for human development in the 1990s. Journal of Development Planning, 19, 259–263.
Jolly, R. (2005). The UN and development thinking and practice. Forum for Development Studies, 1-2005, 49–73.
Jolly, R. (2007). Society for International Development, the North-South Roundtable and the power of ideas. Development, 50(S1), 47–58.
Jolly, R. (2014). UNICEF (United Nations Children’s Fund): Global governance that works. London: Routledge.
Jolly, R., Emmerij, L., Ghai, D., & Lapeyre, F. (2004). UN contributions to development thinking and practice. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Jolly, R., Emmerij, L., & Weiss, T. G. (2009). UN ideas that changes the world. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Kirdar, Ü. (1984a). An overview. In K. Haq (Ed.), Crisis of the ‘80s (pp. 199–207). Washington, DC: North South Roundtable.
Kirdar, Ü. (1984b). Impact of IMF conditionality on human conditions. In K. Haq & C. Massad (Eds.), Adjustment with growth: A search for an equitable solution (pp. 229–242). Islamabad: North South Roundtable.
Kirdar, Ü. (1986). International institutions and human development: A critique. In K. Haq & Ü. Kirdar (Eds.), Human development: The neglected dimension (pp. 421–436). Islamabad: North South Roundtable.
Kirdar, Ü. (1989). A review of past strategies. In K. Haq & Ü. Kirdar (Eds.), Development for people: Goals and strategies for the year 2000 (pp. 181–200). Islamabad: North South Roundtable.
McNeill, D. (2007). Human development: The power of the idea. Journal of Human Development, 8(1), 5–22.
McNeill, D., & Clair, A. L. (2009). Global poverty, ethics and human rights: The role of multilateral organisations. London: Routledge.
Mirowski, P. (1990a). The philosophical bases of institutionalist economics. In D. Lavoie (Ed.), Economics and hermeneutics (pp. 76–112). London: Routledge.
Mirowski, P. (1990b). The rhetoric of economics. History of the Human Sciences, 3(2), 244–257.
Mirowski, P. (2002). Machine dreams: Economics becomes a cyborg science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mirowski, P. (2005a). A revisionist’s view of the history of economic thought. Change, 48(5), 79–94.
Mirowski, P. (2005b). How positivism made a pact with the postwar social sciences in the United States. In G. Steinmetz (Ed.), The politics of method in the human sciences: Positivism and its epistemological others (pp. 142–172). Durham: Duke University Press.
Mirowski, P. (2006). Twelve theses concerning the history of postwar neoclassical price theory. In P. Mirowski & D. W. Hands (Eds.), Agreement on demand: Consumer theory in the twentieth century—Annual supplement to, History of political economy (Vol. 38, pp. 343–379). Durham: Duke University Press.
Mirowski, P., & Hands, D. W. (1998). A paradox of budgets: The postwar stabilization of American neoclassical demand theory. In M. S. Morgan & M. Rutherfold (Eds.), From interwar pluralism to postwar neoclassicism (pp. 260–292). Durham: Duke University Press.
Morgan, M. S., & Rutherfold, M. (1998). American economics: The character of the transformation. In M. S. Morgan & M. Rutherfold (Eds.), From interwar pluralism to postwar neoclassicism – Annual supplement to, History of political economy (Vol. 30, pp. 1–26). Durham: Duke University Press.
Murphy, C. (2006). The United Nations Development Programme: A better way? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
North South Roundtable (NSRT) & UNDP. (1983, August 29–September 1). Statement from Istanbul: A report on the Istanbul Roundtable on world monetary, financial and human resource development issues. Istanbul.
Ponzio, R. (2008). The advent of the Human Development Report. In K. Haq & R. Ponzio (Eds.), Pioneering the human development revolution: An intellectual biography of Mahbub ul Haq (pp. 88–111). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rahnema, M. (1997a). Introduction. In M. Rahnema & V. Bawtree (Eds.), The post-development reader (pp. ix–xix). London: Zed.
Rahnema, M. (1997b). Towards post-development: Searching for signposts, a new language and new paradigms. In M. Rahnema & V. Bawtree (Eds.), The post-development reader (pp. 377–403). London: Zed.
Rist, G. (1997). The history of development: From western origins to global faith. London: Zed.
Sen, A. K. (1989). Development as capabilities expansion. Journal of Development Planning, 19, 41–58.
Sen, A. K. (1997). Development thinking at the beginning of the XXI century. In L. Emmerij (Ed.), Economic and social development into the XXI century (pp. 531–551). Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.
Sen, A. K. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Singer, H. (1995). An historical perspective. In M. U. Haq, R. Jolly, P. Streeten, & K. Haq (Eds.), The UN and the Bretton Woods Institutions: New challenges for the twenty-first century (pp. 17–25). Basingstoke: Macmillan.
St Clair, A. L. (2004). The role of ideas in the United Nations Development Programme. In M. Bøås & D. McNeill (Eds.), Global institutions and development: Framing the world? (pp. 178–192). London: Routledge.
St Clair, A. L. (2007). A methodologically pragmatist approach to development ethics. Journal of Global Ethics, 3, 141–162.
UN. (1970). Yearbook of the United Nations 1970, New York.
UN. (1976). Yearbook of the United Nations 1976, New York.
UN. (1980). Yearbook of the United Nations 1980, New York.
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (1967–74). Pre-Investment News, New York.
UNDP. (1974–86). Report of the Administrator, New York.
UNDP. (1975). Commitment, New York.
UNDP. (1975–77). Action UNDP, New York.
UNDP. (1987–89). UNDP World Development Annual Report, New York.
UNDP. (1988–92). World Development, New York.
UNDP. (1990–91). UNDP Annual Report: World development, New York.
UNDP. (1992–2009). UNDP Annual Report, New York.
Wade, R. H. (2001a). Making the World Development Report 2000: Attacking poverty. World Development, 29(8), 1435–1441.
Wade, R. H. (2001b). Showdown at the World Bank. New Left Review, 7(January/February), 124–137.
Wade, R. H. (2002). US hegemony and the World Bank: The fight over people and ideas. Review of International Political Economy, 9(2), 201–229.
Weiss, T. G., & Carayannis, T. (2005). Ideas matter: Voices from the United Nations. Forum for Development Studies, 1-2005, 243–274.
World Bank. (1980). World Development Report 1980. DC: Washington.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hirai, T. (2017). Institutionalisation of Development Concepts. In: The Creation of the Human Development Approach. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51568-7_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51568-7_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-51567-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-51568-7
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)