Skip to main content

The Political–Legal Representation Circuit of Human Rights Politics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Intermediation and Representation in Latin America

Part of the book series: Studies of the Americas ((STAM))

Abstract

In conventional wisdom, human rights politics is depicted as civil society engagement centred in both advocacy and legal representation of victims at national and international levels. Such understanding overlooks human rights non-governmental organisations (NGOs) working at the local level, confining them to a single centred role of transmission of international ideas, advocacy for change or defence of victims. Drawing on a refreshing and original depiction, the chapter provides a more textured understanding of human rights politics in light of the political intermediation approach. A full-fledged fieldwork on the defence of human rights in cases of victims of forced disappearances in Nuevo Leon, Mexico, shows that human rights organisations intermediate between victims of human rights violations and local and state government level agencies, in order to help empower victims and deploy rules and repertoires of action.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Anaya Muñoz, A. 2012. El país bajo presión. Debatiendo el papel del escrutinio internacional de derechos humanos sobre México. Mexico: CIDE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brysk, A. 2000. Democratizing Civil Society in Latin America. Journal of Democracy 11(3): 151–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CADHAC. 2015. Desaparición de personas en Nuevo León. Sistematización de experiencias en búsqueda de la justicia y la verdad. Mexico: CADHAC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chama, M. 2010. La defensa de presos políticos a comienzos de los ‘70: ejercicio profesional, derecho y política. Cuadernos de antropología social 32: 195–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J.L., and A. Arato. 1994. Civil Society and Political Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, C. 2010. Post-transitional Justice. Human Rights Trials in Chile and El Salvador. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estévez, A. 2007. Transición a la democracia y derechos humanos en México: la pérdida de integralidad en el discurso. Andamios 3(6): 7–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008. Human Rights and Free Trade in Mexico: A Discursive and Sociopolitical Perspective. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Felstiner, W., R. Abel, and A. Sarat. 1980. The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming, Claiming. Law and Society Review 15: 631–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, J. 2014. Human Rights Contention in Latin America: A Comparative Study. Human Rights Review 15(2): 139–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, J. 2014. Tipping the Scales of Justice: The Role of Citizen Action in Strengthening the Rule of Law. PhD thesis, Cornell University.

    Google Scholar 

  • González Ocantos, E. 2014. Persuade Them or Oust Them: Crafting Judicial Change and Transitional Justice in Argentina. Comparative Politics, Forthcoming 46(4): 479–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurza Lavalle, A. 2014. NGOs, Human Rights and Representation. Sur. Revista Internacional de Derechos Humanos 11(20): 293–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurza Lavalle, A., and G. Zaremberg. 2014. Más allá de la representación y del clientelismo: hacia un lenguaje de la intermediación política. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Políticas y Sociales 59(221): 19–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, K.R. 1999. Lawyering for a Social Change: What’s A Laywer to Do. Mich. J. Race & L. 5: 201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keck, M.E., and K. Sikkink. 1998. Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics. New York: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lessa, F., T.D. Olsen, L.A. Payne, G. Pereira, and A.G. Reiter. 2014. Overcoming Impunity: Pathways to Accountability in Latin America. International Journal of Transitional Justice 8(1): 75–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsico, R.D. 1994. Working for Social Change and Preserving Client Autonomy: Is There a Role for Facilitative Lawyering. Clinical Law Review 1: 639.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mccann, M.W. 1994. Rights at Work: Pay Equity Reform and the Politics of Legal Mobilization. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2006. Law and Social Movements: Contemporary Perspectives. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 2: 17–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merry, S.E. 2003. Rights Talk and the Experience of Law: Implementing Women’s Human Rights to Protection from Violence. Human Rights Quarterly 25(2): 343–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mertus, J. 2004. Raising Expectations? Civil Society’s Influence on Human Rights and US Foreign Policy. Journal of Human Rights 3(1): 21–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neier, A. 2012. The International Human Rights Movement: A History. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Santamaría, Á., and V. Vecchioli. 2008. Derechos humanos en América Latina: mundialización y circulación internacional del conocimiento experto jurídico. Bogotá: Universidad del Rosario.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarat, A., and S.A. Scheingold. 1998. Cause Lawyering: Political Commitments and Professional Responsibilities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smultovitz, C. 2012. The Past is Never Past: Accountability and Justice for Past Human Rights Violations in Argentina. Buenos Aires: mimeo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorj, B., and D. Martucelli. 2008. El desafío latinoamericano: cohesión social y democracia. Argentina: Siglo XXI.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stammers, N. 2009. Human Rights and Social Movements. London: Pluto Press; New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarrow, S. 2005. The New Transnational Activism. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Teitel, R.G. 2003. Transitional Justice Genealogy. Harvard Human Rights Journal 16: 69–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, C. 1984. Social Movements and National Politics. In Statemaking and Social Movements: Essays in History and Theory, ed. C. Bright and S. Harding. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

Dictionaries Consulted

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ansolabehere, K., de Bethencourt, P.V. (2017). The Political–Legal Representation Circuit of Human Rights Politics. In: Zaremberg, G., Guarneros-Meza, V., Gurza Lavalle, A. (eds) Intermediation and Representation in Latin America. Studies of the Americas. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51538-0_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics