Abstract
This chapter examines the cognitive structure of design methods as an entry point to understand how disciplinary bias, issues of scale, and complex situations can be negotiated. Moving from the foundational structure of divergent and convergent thinking, the discussion is focused on the underlying frameworks and location of judgment criteria in design processes. These are the key to understand how diverse methods can engage each other across disciplinary bias and scales to align design outcomes. Ultimately, scaling methods is about the ability to transfer values between missions and goals to strategies and tactics within a design method.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adhya A, Plowright P, Stevens J (2010) Defining sustainable urbanism: towards a responsive urban design. In: Proceedings of the conference on sustainability and the built environment. King Saud University, Saudi Arabia, pp 17–38
Alexander C (1964) Notes on the synthesis of form. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Baumgarten AG (1954) Meditationes Philosophicae de Nonnullis ad Poema Pertinentibus. English edition: Baumgarten A G (trans: Aschenbrenner K, Holther WB). University of California Press, Berkeley/Los Angeles
Buchanan R (1992) Wicked problems in design thinking. Des Issues 8(2):5–21
Chong D, Druckman JN (2007) Farming theory. Annu Rev Polit Sci 10(1):104
Cret PP (1941) The Ecole des Beaux-Arts and architectural education. J Am Soc Archit Hist 1(2):14
Dorst K, Cross N (2001) Creativity in the design process: co-evolution of problem–solution. Des Stud 22(5):425–437
Dorst K, Dijkhuis J (1995) Comparing paradigms for describing design activity. Des Stud 16(2):261–274
Durand J-N L (2000) Partie Graphique des Cours d’Architecture Faits a l’Ecole Royale Polytechnique Depuis sa Réorganisation; English: Précis of the lectures on architecture; with Graphic portion of the lectures on architecture. Texts & Documents, Getty Research Institute, Los Angeles
Finke RA, Ward TB, Smith SM (1992) Creative cognition: theory, research, and applications. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Friedman K (2003) Theory construction in design research: criteria: approaches, and methods. Des Stud 24(6):507–522
Groak S (1990) The idea of building: thought and action in the design and production of buildings. E & FN Spon (Taylor & Francis), London
Hellmund P, Smith DS (2006) Designing greenways: sustainable landscapes for nature and people. Island Press, Washington, DC
Inam A (2002) Meaningful urban design: teleological/catalytic/relevant. J Urban Des 7(2):36
Ingaramo R, Voghera A (2012a) Planning and architecture. Searching for an approach. Alinea International, Florence
Ingaramo R, Voghera A (2012b) Finding a design method: “Integrated multiscale project”. In: Proceedings of the EAAE/ARCC international conference on architectural research, Politecnico di Milano, Italy, pp 526–529
Jones JC (1973) Design methods: seeds of human futures. Wiley-Interscience, London
Jovanovic Weiss S, Plowright P (eds) (2014) Inhabiting everyday monuments. CRITPraX. http://issuu.com/critprax/docs/critprax14_book_ebook-issuu
Kruft H-W (1994) A history of architectural theory. Princeton Architectural Press, New York
Lawson B (2006) How designers think, the design process demystified. Architectural Press, Oxford
Plato, Hackforth R (1972) Plato’s Philebus; Uniform Title: Philebus. Cambridge University Press, London
Plowright P (2014) Revealing architectural design: methods, frameworks & tools. Routledge, London
Plowright P (2015) Structuring the irrational: tactics in methods. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference for design education researchers, vol 1. Aalto University, DRS, Cumulus, DESIGN-ED, Chicago, pp 397–415
Plowright P, Adhya A (2012) Setting priorities: sustainability, environmental health, and embedded value judgments for the urban design process. In: Proceedings of the EAAE/ARCC international conference on architectural research, Politecnico di Milano, Italy, pp 118–121
Plowright P, Adhya A (2014a) Sustainable architecture as ecology: defining shared systemic priorities of public health and social ethics in places. In: Khan A Z, Allacker K (eds) Architecture and sustainability: critical perspectives. ACCO, Leuven (Belgium), Den Haag (Netherlands)
Plowright P, Adhya A (2014b) Wilderness and its absence: dominance of anthropocentric human-nature relationship in sustainable development. In: Proceedings of EDRA45NewOrleans, Environmental Design Research Association (EDRA), New Orleans
Poe EA (1846) The philosophy of composition. Graham’s Magazine 28(4):163–167
Rowe P (1987) Design thinking. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Sesame Street (2013) Sesame Street-O-Saurus. Season 43 (2012–2013). February 4, 2013 http://www.sesamestreet.org/media/video_00c00650-fd5e-4474-bbb1a27d636c36ef?video=00c00650-fd5e-4474-bbb1-a27d636c36ef
Stempfle J, Badke-Schaub P (2002) Thinking in design teams – an analysis of team communication. Des Stud 23(5):473–496
Sullivan L (1918) Kindergarten chats and other writings (Documents of modern art). Dover Publications, New York
Viollet-le-Duc EE (1874) English version: (trans: Towle G M) The story of a house. James R. Osgood and Company, Boston
Ward TB, Smith SM, Finke RA (1999) Creative cognition. In: Sternberg RJ (ed) Handbook of creativity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA, p 193
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Plowright, P.D. (2016). Integrating Methods : Aligning the Effects of Scale and Bias . In: Ingaramo, R., Voghera, A. (eds) Topics and Methods for Urban and Landscape Design. Urban and Landscape Perspectives, vol 19. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51535-9_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51535-9_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-51534-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-51535-9
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)