Advertisement

Occlusal Dysesthesia and Dysfunction

  • Somsak MitrirattanakulEmail author
  • Tan Hee Hon
  • João N. A. R. Ferreira
Chapter

Abstract

  • The majority of the clinical research studies had agreed on one point: any dental procedure (occlusal adjustment, restorative, prosthetic, or orthodontic approaches) that aims to achieve equilibrated occlusal contacts between the maxillary and mandibular teeth (in maximum intercuspation) must be avoided in patients with occlusal dysesthesia (OD).

  • Therefore, any dental procedure that interferes with the occlusion of OD patients usually fails to improve the symptoms but could increase the patient’s somatosensorial focus on his or her bite.

References

  1. 1.
    Baba K, Aridome K, Haketa T, Kino K, Ohyama T. Sensory perceptive and discriminative abilities of patients with occlusal dysesthesia. Nihon Hotetsu Shika Gakkai Zasshi. 2005;49:599–607.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Clark G, Simmons M. Occlusal dysesthesia and temporomandibular disorders: is there a link? Alpha Omegan. 2003;96:33–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Clark GT, Minakuchi H, Lotaif AC. Orofacial pain and sensory disorders in the elderly. Dent Clin N Am. 2005;49:343–62.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hara ES, Matsuka Y, Minakuchi H, Clark GT, Kuboki T. Occlusal dysesthesia: a qualitative systematic review of the epidemiology, aetiology and management. J Oral Rehabil. 2012;39:630–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jagger RG, Korszun A. Phantom bite revisited. Br Dent J. 2004;197:241–3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Littler B. Phantom bite revisited. Br Dent J. 2005;198:149.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Marbach JJ, Varoscak JR, Blank RT, Lund P. “Phantom bite”: classification and treatment. J Prosthet Dent. 1983;49:556–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Marbach JJ. Phantom bite syndrome. Am J Psychiatry. 1978;135:476–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Marbach JJ. Phantom bite. Am J Orthod. 1976;70:190–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Marbach JJ. Psychosocial factors for failure to adapt to dental prostheses. Dent Clin North Am. 1985;29:215–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Melis M, Zawawi KH. Occlusal dysesthesia: a topical narrative review. J Oral Rehabil. 2015;42:779–85.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mew J. Phantom bite. Br Dent J. 2004;197:660.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Reeves JL, Merrill RL. Diagnostic and treatment challenges in occlusal dysesthesia. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2007;35:198–207.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tinastepe N, Kucuk BB, Oral K. Phantom bite: a case report and literature review. Cranio. 2015;33:228–31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Toyofuku A, Kikuta T. Treatment of phantom bite syndrome with milnacipran – a case series. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2006;2:387–90.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Watanabe M, Umezaki Y, Suzuki S, et al. Psychiatric comorbidities and psychopharmacological outcomes of phantom bite syndrome. J Psychosom Res. 2015;78:255–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Somsak Mitrirattanakul
    • 1
    Email author
  • Tan Hee Hon
    • 2
  • João N. A. R. Ferreira
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Masticatory Science, Faculty of DentistryMahidol UniversityBangkokThailand
  2. 2.Endodontics, Operative Dentistry & Prosthodontics, Faculty of DentistryNational University of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore
  3. 3.Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Faculty of DentistryNational University of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations