Advertisement

Region-Based Watermarking for Images

  • Konstantinos A. RaftopoulosEmail author
  • Nikolaos Papadakis
  • Klimis S. Ntalianis
  • Paraskevi Tzouveli
  • Georgios Goudelis
  • Stefanos D. Kollias
Chapter
Part of the Springer Optimization and Its Applications book series (SOIA, volume 113)

Abstract

Plain rotation, scaling, and/or translation (RST) of an image can lead to loss of watermark synchronization and thus authentication failure with standard techniques. The block-based approaches in particular, albeit strong against frequency and cropping attacks, are sensitive to geometric distortions due to the need for repositioning the blocks’ rectangular grid of reference. In this paper, we propose a block-based approach for watermarking image objects in a way that is invariant to RST distortions. With the term image object we refer to semantically contiguous parts of images that have a specific contour boundary. The proposed approach is based on shape information since the watermark is embedded in image blocks, the location and orientation of which are defined by Eulerian tours that are appropriately arranged in layers, around the object’s robust skeleton. The object’s robust skeleton is derived by its boundary after applying an extraction technique and not only is invariant to RST transformations but also to cropping, clipping, and other common deformation attacks, difficult to defend with current methods. Experiments using standard benchmark datasets demonstrate the advantages of the proposed scheme in comparison to alternative state-of-the-art methods.

Keywords

Image watermarking Intellectual property protection Invariant watermarking Region-based watermarking 

AMS Subject Classification Numbers:

65D18 68U10 94A08 68P25 

References

  1. 1.
    J. Cox, M.L. Miller, J.A. Bloom, Digital Watermarking (Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, 2001)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    N. Bi, Q. Sun, D. Huang, Z. Yang, J. Huang, Robust image watermarking based on multiband wavelets and empirical mode decomposition. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 16 (8), 1956–1966 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    I.J. Cox, J. Kilian, F.T. Leighton, T. Shamoon, Secure spread spectrum watermarking for multimedia. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 6 (12), 1673–1687 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. Alghoniemy, A.H. Tewfik, Geometric invariance in image watermarking. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 13 (2), 145–153 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    P. Dong, J. Brankov, N. Galatsanos, Y. Yang, Geometric robust watermarking based on a new mesh model correction approach. in IEEE International Conference on Image Processing ICIP (Rochester, New York, 2002)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    S. Kay, E. Izquierdo, Robust content based image watermarking. in WIAMIS 2001 - Workshop on Image Analysis for Multimedia Interactive Services, Tampere, Finland, 16–17 May 2001Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. Lichtenauer, I. Setyawan, T. Kalker, R. Lagendijk, Exhaustive geometrical search and false positive watermark detection probability, in SPIE Electronic Imaging 2002, Security and Watermarking of Multimedia Contents V, Santa Clara, January 2003Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    S. Baudry, P. Nguyen, H. Maître, Estimation of geometric distortions in digital watermarking, in IEEE- ICIP 2002, Rochester, September 2002Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    D. Delannay, B. Macq, 2-D Periodic patterns for image watermarking, in Advanced Sciences and Technologies for Security Applications, vol. 1 (Springer, New York, 2005), pp. 297–18Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    M. Alghoniemy, A.H. Tewfik, Progressive quantized projection watermarking scheme, in Proceedings of the 7th ACM International Multimedia Conference, Orlando, FL (1999), pp. 295–298Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. Wang, G. Liu, Y. Dai, J. Sun, Z. Wang, S. Lian, Locally optimum detection for Barni’s multiplicative watermarking in DWT domain. Signal Process. 88 (1), 117–130 (2008)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    W. Lu, H. Lu, F.-L. Chung, Feature based watermarking using watermark template match. Appl. Math. Comput. 177, 377–386 (2006). ElsevierGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    C. Serdean, M. Ambroze, M. Tomlinson, G. Wade, Dwt based video watermarking for copyright protection invariant to geometrical attacks, in International Symposium on Communication Systems, Networks and Digital Signal Processing, Staffordshire University, UK, 15–17 July 2002Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    F. Deguillaume, S. Voloshynovskiy, T. Pun, A method for the estimation and recovering from general affine transforms in digital watermarking applications, in SPIE Electronic Imaging 2002, Security and Watermarking of Multimedia Contents IV, San Jose, February 2002Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    J.J.K.O. Ruanaidh, T. Pun, Rotation, scale and translation invariant spread spectrum digital image watermarking. Signal Process. 66, 303–318 (1998)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    B.-S. Kim, J.-G. Choi, K.-H. Park, RST-Resistant Image Watermarking Using Invariant Centroid and Reordered Fourier-Mellin Transform. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2939 (Springer, New York, 2004), pp. 370–381Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    C.-Y. Lin, Public watermarking surviving general scaling and cropping: an application for print-and-scan process, in Multimedia and Security Workshop at ACM Multimedia 99, Orlando, FL, October 1999Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    H. Liu, M. Steinebach, Non-ubiquitous watermarking for image authentication by region of interest masking, in Proceedings of the Picture Coding Symposium, Portugal (2007)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    K. Zebbiche, F. Khelifi, Region-based watermarking of biometric images: case study in fingerprint images. Int. J. Digital Multimed. Broadcast. 2008, 1–13 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    X. Guo, T.-G. Zhuang, A region-based lossless watermarking scheme for enhancing security of medical data. J. Digit. Imaging 22 (1), 53–64 (2009). SpringerGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    K. Raftopoulos, K. Ntalianis, P. Tzouveli, N. Tsapatsoulis, A. Parker-Wood, M. Ferecatu, Watermark resynchronization: an efficient approach based on Eulerian tours around a robust skeleton, in Communications and Multimedia Security: 14th IFIP TC 6/TC 11 International Conference, CMS 2013, Magdeburg, Germany, 25–26 September 2013Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    C.Y. Lin, M. Wu, J.A. Bloom, I.J. Cox, M.L. Miller, Y.M. Lui, Rotation, scale, and translation resilient watermarking for images. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 10 (5), 767–82 (2001)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    R.L. Ogniewicz, Discrete Voronoi Skeletons (Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zurich, 1992)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    T. Sebastian, P. Klein, B. Kimia, Recognition of shapes by editing their Shock graphs. IEEE Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 26, 551–57 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    J. Viega, Practical random number generation in software, in Proceedings of the 19th Annual Computer Security Applications Conference, December 2003Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    J.A. Sethian, A fast marching level set method for monotonically advancing fronts. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 93 (4), 1591–1595 (1996)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    J.A. Sethian, Level Set Methods and Fast Marching Methods, 2nd edn. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    P. Kapsalas, S. Kollias, Affine morphological shape stable boundary regions (SSBR) for image representation, in Proceedings of International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP) 2011, Brussels, September 2011Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    T.B. Sebastian, P. Klein, B.B. Kimia, Recognition of shapes by editing Shock graphs. Proc. Int. Conf. Comput. Vis. 1, 755–762 (2001)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    S.R. Deans, The Radon Transform and Some of Its Applications (Krieger Publishing Company, Malabar, 1983)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    R.O. Duda, P.E. Hart, Use of the hough transformation to detect lines and curves in pictures. Commun. Assoc. Comput. Mach. 15 (1), 11–15 (1972)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    V. Kolmogorov, R. Zabih, What energy functions can be minimized via graph cuts? IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 26 (2), 147–159 (2004)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    M. Kass, A. Witkin, D. Terzopoulos, Snakes: active contour models. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 1 (4), 321–331 (1988). SpringerGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Konstantinos A. Raftopoulos
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Nikolaos Papadakis
    • 3
  • Klimis S. Ntalianis
    • 4
  • Paraskevi Tzouveli
    • 1
  • Georgios Goudelis
    • 1
  • Stefanos D. Kollias
    • 1
  1. 1.National Technical University of AthensZografouGreece
  2. 2.The American College of GreeceAgia ParaskeviGreece
  3. 3.Hellenic Military AcademyVari AttikisGreece
  4. 4.Technical Educational Institute of AthensEgaleoGreece

Personalised recommendations