Skip to main content

Differentiating Between Santos and Uribe

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 364 Accesses

Part of the book series: Studies of the Americas ((STAM))

Abstract

This chapter describes a more recent development in the Community’s radical narrative, in which President Juan Manuel Santos is perceived to be ‘the same’ as ex-President Álvaro Uribe, despite different official rhetoric on peace and victims’ rights. It describes how the Community’s four demands have been translated into orders by the Colombian Constitutional Court, leading to an attempt at a presidential apology which was received ambiguously by the Community, and the attitude that Community members have to state reparations programmes. Drawing on conversations with Community members about current topics such as the peace process, it shows how the radical narrative functions as a self-reconfirming framework.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Reply from the Presidency to Father Javier Giraldo to a derecho de petición, 26 January 2011. JGA 2011/58.

  2. 2.

    Semana, 20 May 2017. ‘“Pido perdón a las madres de Soacha”: Álvaro Uribe’. http://www.semana.com/nacion/articulo/alvaro-uribe-le-pidio-perdon-a-las-madres-de-soacha-por-afectar-la-memoria-de-sus-hijos/525896 [accessed 17 July 2017].

  3. 3.

    “On 12 January 2006, the army sent a document to the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, in which they affirmed that the Humanitarian Zones were inviable, because in the Geneva Conventions it is supposed that such zones should be created by agreement between sides in combat and at that moment there was no dialogue between the government and the guerrilla”, letter from the Community submitted to Humberto de la Calle and Iván Márquez, the heads of the government and FARC negotiating teams in the Havana peace process, 29 October 2014, during the fourth delegation of victims to Havana. Author’s personal archive.

  4. 4.

    Letter from the Ministry of the Interior and Justice Ministry to Father Javier Giraldo, 11 May 2011, JGA 2011/151–153.

  5. 5.

    Community communiqué, 14 June 2011. ‘Respuesta al gobierno nacional ante la negativa a interlocutar con la Comunidad de Paz’. http://cdpsanjose.org/?q=node/198 [accessed 1 June 2014].

  6. 6.

    Ministry of the Interior, 29 May 2013. ‘Intervención del Ministro del Interior Fernando Carrillo en el acto de retractación frente a acusaciones realizadas contra la “Comunidad de Paz de San José de Apartadó y sus acompañantes”’. Author’s personal archive.

  7. 7.

    Community communiqué, 29 May 2013, ‘Una agresión más del alto gobierno’. http://cdpsanjose.org/?q=node/262 [accessed 1 June 2014].

  8. 8.

    For example, Caracol Radio, 29 May 2013, ‘Comunidad de Apartadó no acepta desagravio del Gobierno por ausencia de Santos’, http://www.caracol.com.co/noticias/regional/comunidad-de-apartado-no-acepta-desagravio-del-gobierno-por-ausencia-de-santos/20130529/nota/1906946.aspx; El Colombiano 29 May 2013, ‘Víctimas de Apartadó no aceptaron desagravio del Gobierno’,

    http://www.elcolombiano.com/BancoConocimiento/V/victimas_de_apartado_no_aceptaron_desagravio_del_gobierno/victimas_de_apartado_no_aceptaron_desagravio_del_gobierno.asp;

    Terra, 29 May 2013, ‘El Estado que pidió un perdón que no fue aceptado por sus víctimas’,

    http://noticias.terra.com.pe/internacional/latinoamerica/el-estado-que-pidio-un-perdon-que-no-fue-aceptado-por-sus-victimas,318ddf70a20fe310VgnCLD2000000ec6eb0aRCRD.html; and RCN Radio, 29 May 2013, ‘Comunidad de Apartadó, inconforme porque Santos no pidió perdón público’,

    http://www.rcnradio.com/noticias/comunidad-de-apartado-inconforme-con-actitud-del-gobierno-por-no-pedir-perdon-publico-69014

  9. 9.

    El Tiempo, 29 May 2013, ‘Estado rectifica acusaciones de Uribe contra San José de Apartadó’. http://www.eltiempo.com/politica/carrillo-dice-que-rectifica-acusaciones-de-uribe-por-san-jose-de-apartado_12832082-4 [accessed 1 June 2014].

  10. 10.

    Community communiqué, 16 December 2013, ‘El Presidente nos pide perdón’. http://cdpsanjose.org/?q=node/290 [accessed 16 December 2013].

  11. 11.

    El Tiempo, 13 December 2013. ‘Santos pidió perdón a Comunidad de Paz de San José de Apartadó’. http://www.eltiempo.com/politica/santos-pide-perdon-a-comunidad-de-san-jose-de-apartado_13272615-4 [accessed 13 December 2013].

  12. 12.

    For example, Community communiqué, 27 October 2014. http://www.cdpsanjose.org/node/61 [accessed 5 January 2017].

  13. 13.

    CINEP. 2015. ‘Infografía: San José de Apartadó, Comunidad de Paz’. http://www.cinep.org.co/Home2/component/k2/item/113-recurso-002-infografia-san-jose-de-apartado.html [accessed 14 July 2015].

  14. 14.

    Interview in November 2013 for PBI UK, author’s personal archive.

Bibliography

  • Burnyeat, Gwen (2010). ‘Una barrera a la paz: polarización en el debate colombiano de víctimas’. In Revista Javeriana 768(146): 30–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corte Constitucional (2012). Auto 164/12 Seguimiento al cumplimiento de las órdenes impartidas en la sentencia T-1025 de 2007. http://www.corteconstitucional.gov.co/relatoria/autos/2012/A164-12.htm [accessed 1 June 2014].

  • Gómez-Suárez, Andrei (2016). El triunfo del No: La paradoja emocional detrás del plebiscito. Bogotá: Icono Editorial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, Timothy (2006). ‘Society, Economy, and the State Effect’. In Aradhana Sharma and Akhil Gupta (Eds.) The Anthropology of the State: A Reader. Oxford; Malden: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tate, Winifred (2007). Counting the Dead: The Culture and Politics of Human Rights Activism in Colombia. Berkeley; Los Angeles; London: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Burnyeat, G. (2018). Differentiating Between Santos and Uribe. In: Chocolate, Politics and Peace-Building. Studies of the Americas. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51478-9_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics