Abstract
Automated bots play a massive role in many online environments. The security firm Incapsula estimates that over 55 percent of Internet traffic is created by these automated computer programs. Social bots are iterations of this technology that move beyond scraping the Internet for data and toward active communication with human users. These programs generally function on social media platforms such as Facebook, Twitter , Telegram, and Reddit. Political actors—politicians, lobbyists, militaries, and hacktivists—are increasingly using politicized social bots (or “political bots ”), in attempts to manipulate the opinions of people online. These bots are built to mimic real users and computationally enhance the ability to deploy propaganda. What can the history of bots tell us about the power dynamics that exist between those who build and release social bots and other users active on social networking services? What can traditional political communication theory teach us about social bots ? How do new forms of agency in political communication complicate those traditional theories? How might qualitative research methods help researchers to study and understand social bots as a new, and fundamentally technical, political actor? This chapter analyzes a diverse range of literature in order to explore and address these questions. The aim is to (1) identify how uses of social bot technology interact with ideas related to communication, power , and structures of agency and (2) explain how qualitative methods and historical context can help us to understand the phenomenon of the political bot.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alexander, L. 2015. Social Network Analysis Reveals Full Scale of Kremlin’s Twitter Bot Campaign. Global Voices. https://globalvoices.org/2015/04/02/analyzing-kremlin-twitter-bots/.
Alfonso, F. 2014. Reddit Cofounder Abandons r/Technology Following Banned Terms Drama. http://www.dailydot.com/layer8/alexis-ohanian-reddit-technology-banned-words/. Accessed 26 Aug 2016.
Ananny, M. 2014. Networked Press Freedom and Social Media: Tracing Historical and Contemporary Forces in Press–Public Relations. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 19 (4): 938–956. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12076.
Barnes, J.A. 1969. Graph Theory and Social Networks: A Technical Comment on Connectedness and Connectivity. Sociology 3 (2): 215–232. doi:10.1177/003803856900300205.
Barocas, S., S. Hood, and M. Ziewitz. 2013. Provocation Piece|Governing Algorithms. http://governingalgorithms.org/resources/provocation-piece/.
Benkler, Y. 2006. The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Bennett, W.L., K. Foot, and M. Xenos. 2011. Narratives and Network Organization: A Comparison of Fair Trade Systems in Two Nations. Journal of Communication 61 (2): 219–245. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01538.x.
Bennett, W.L., and A. Segerberg. 2012. The Logic of Connective Action. Information, Communication & Society 15 (5): 739–768. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2012.670661.
Berry, D.M. 2012. The Relevance of Understanding Code to International Political Economy. International Politics 49 (2): 277–296. doi:10.1057/ip.2011.37.
Beyer, J.L. 2014. Expect Us: Online Communities and Political Mobilization. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Boshmaf, Y., I. Muslukhov, K. Beznosov, & M. Ripeanu. 2011. The Socialbot Network: When Bots Socialize for Fame and Money. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual Computer Security Applications Conference, 93–102. ACM. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2076746.
Bowler, G. 2010. Netnography: A Method Specifically Designed to Study Cultures and Communities Online. Qualitative Report 15 (5): 1270–1275.
Burrell, J. 2009. The Field Site as a Network: A Strategy for Locating Ethnographic Research. Field Methods 21 (2): 181–199. doi:10.1177/1525822X08329699.
Calo, R. 2015. Robotics and the Lessons of Cyberlaw. California Law Review 103: 513.
Castells, M. 2007. Communication, Power and Counter-power in the Network Society. International Journal of Communication 1 (1): 29.
Chadwick, A. 2013. The Hybrid Media System: Politics and Power. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Chu, Z., S. Gianvecchio, H. Wang, and S. Jajodia. 2010. Who is Tweeting on Twitter: Human, Bot, or Cyborg? In Proceedings of the 26th Annual Computer Security Applications Conference, 21–30. Austin, TX: ACM. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1920265.
Chu, Z., S. Gianvecchio, H. Wang, and S. Jajodia. 2012. Detecting Automation of Twitter Accounts: Are You a Human, Bot, or Cyborg? IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing 9 (6): 811–824. doi:10.1109/TDSC.2012.75.
Coldewey, D. 2012. Romney Twitter Account Gets Upsurge in Fake Followers, but from Where. NBC News.
Coleman, G. 2014. Hacker, Hoaxer, Whistleblower, Spy: The Many Faces of Anonymous. London; New York: Verso.
Cook, D.M., B. Waugh, M. Abdipanah, O. Hashemi, and S. Rahman. 2014. Twitter Deception and Influence: Issues of Identity, Slacktivism, and Puppetry. Journal of Information Warfare. http://works.bepress.com/david_cook/15/.
Dahlberg, N. 2014. It’s Prime Time for Hackathons and Other Technology Events. http://www.miamiherald.com/2014/02/09/3920440/its-prime-time-for-hackathons.html. Accessed 27 June 2014.
Dubbin, R. 2013. The Rise of Twitter Bots.
Durkheim, E. 1895. The Rules of Sociological Method.
Ford, R.T. 1999. Save the Robots: Cyber Profiling and Your So-Called Life. Stanford Law Review 52: 1573.
Forelle, M.C., P.N. Howard, A. Monroy-Hernandez, and S. Savage. 2015. Political Bots and the Manipulation of Public Opinion in Venezuela (SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 2635800). Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2635800.
Geertz, C. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. Basic Books.
Geiger, R.S. 2014. Bots, Bespoke Code, and the Materiality of Software Platforms. Information, Communication & Society 17 (3): 342–356.
Geiger, R.S., and D. Ribes. 2011. Trace Ethnography: Following Coordination Through Documentary Practices. In Presented at the 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), 1–10. IEEE.
Gillespie, T. 2009. Wired Shut, Copyright and the Shape of Digital Culture. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 7 (2/3): 213–218. doi:10.1108/14779960910955927.
Gillespie, T. 2011. Can an Algorithm be Wrong? Twitter Trends, the Specter of Censorship, and Our Faith in the Algorithms Around us. http://culturedigitally.org/2011/10/can-an-algorithm-be-wrong/.
Gillespie, T. 2014. The Relevance of Algorithms. In Media Technologies: Essays on Communication, Materiality, and Society, ed. T. Gillespie, P.J. Boczkowski, and K.A. Foot. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Himelboim, I. 2008. Reply Distribution in Online Discussions: A Comparative Network Analysis of Political and Health Newsgroups. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 14 (1): 156–177. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2008.01435.x.
Hindman, M. 2008. The Myth of Digital Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Hine, C. 2005. Virtual Methods. Bloomsbury Academic: Oxford; New York.
Hogan, B. 2015. From Invisible Algorithms to Interactive Affordances: Data After the Ideology of Machine Learning. In Roles, Trust, and Reputation in Social Media Knowledge Markets, eds. E. Bertino & S.A. Matei, 103–117. Springer International Publishing. http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-05467-4_7.
Horst, H.A., and D. Miller. 2013. Digital Anthropology. A&C Black. http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=9KuPzBgus7oC&oi=fnd&pg=PR5&dq=digital+anthropology&ots=uzgYGqVIHd&sig=OHQMy5JPTRN_zeAov_Jj0mi_3Gk.
Howard, P. 2002. Network Ethnography and the Hypermedia Organization: New Media, New Organizations, New Methods. New Media & Society 4 (4): 550–574.
Howard, P.N. 2006. New Media Campaigns and the Managed Citizen. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.
Howard, P.N. 2015. Pax Technica: The Impact of Automation on Public Opinion. New York: Yale University Press.
Jankowski, N.W., and M.V. Selm. 2008. Internet-Based Political Communication Research. Javnost—The Public 15 (2): 5–16. doi:10.1080/13183222.2008.11008967.
Kalathil, S., and T.C. Boas. 2010. Open Networks, Closed Regimes: The Impact of the Internet on Authoritarian Rule. Carnegie Endowment.
Karpf, D. 2012. The MoveOn Effect: The Unexpected Transformation of American Political Advocacy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Kelly, K. 2014. The Three Breakthroughs That Have Finally Unleashed AI on the World. http://www.wired.com/2014/10/future-of-artificial-intelligence/. Accessed 14 Oct 2015.
Kozinets, R.V. 2010. Netnography: Doing Ethnographic Research Online. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Kreiss, D., M. Finn, and F. Turner. 2011. The Limits of Peer Production: Some Reminders from Max Weber for the Network Society. New Media & Society 13 (2): 243–259. doi:10.1177/1461444810370951.
Latour, B. 2012. We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge; New York: Harvard University Press.
Latour, B., and C. Venn. 2002. Morality and Technology the End of the Means. Theory, Culture & Society 19 (5–6): 247–260. doi:10.1177/026327602761899246.
Lee, H.J., and T. Streeter. 2012. Romancing the Internet an Interview with Thomas Streeter. Journal of Communication Inquiry 36 (2): 95–110. doi:10.1177/0196859912445067.
Lindlof, T., and B. Taylor. 2010. Qualitative Communication Research Methods. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications Inc.
Manovich, L. 2001. The Language of New Media. Boston, MA: MIT Press.
Markham, A.N., and N.K. Baym. 2008. Internet Inquiry: Conversations About Method. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications Inc.
Medeiros, J. de. n.d. Turkey’s Twitter-Bot Army and the Politics of Social Media. http://Internetmagazin.de/en/Turkey-Twitterbot-army-and-social-media-politics-174524. Accessed 24 July 2014.
Metaxas, P.T., and E. Mustafaraj. 2012a. Social Media and the Elections. Science 338 (6106): 472–473.
Metaxas, P.T., and E. Mustafaraj. 2012b. Social Media and the Elections. Science 338 (6106): 472–473.
Miles, M., A.M. Huberman, and J. Saldaña. 2013. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications Inc.
Motti, J. 2014. Twitter Acknowledges 23 Million Active Users are Actually Bots. http://www.techtimes.com/articles/12840/20140812/twitter-acknowledges-14-percent-users-bots-5-percent-spam-bots.htm. Accessed 26 Aug 2016.
Mukerji, C. 2003. Intelligent Uses of Engineering and the Legitimacy of State Power. Technology and Culture 44 (4): 655–676.
Nagy, P., and G. Neff. 2015. Imagined Affordance: Reconstructing a Keyword for Communication Theory. Social Media + Society 1 (2): 2056305115603385. doi:10.1177/2056305115603385.
Nardi, B. 1995. Studying Context: A Comparison of Activity Theory, Situated Action Models, and Distributed Cognition. Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human-Computer Interaction, 69–96. Boston, MA: MIT Press.
Neff, G. 2012. Venture Labor: Work and the Burden of Risk in Innovative Industries. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Neff, G., T. Jordan, J. McVeigh-Schultz, and T. Gillespie. 2012. Affordances, Technical Agency, and the Politics of Technologies of Cultural Production. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 56 (2): 299–313. doi:10.1080/08838151.2012.678520.
Orcutt, M. 2012. Twitter Mischief Plagues Mexico’s Election. http://www.technologyreview.com/news/428286/twitter-mischief-plagues-mexicos-election/. Accessed 20 June 2014.
Owen, T. 2015. Disruptive Power: The Crisis of the State in the Digital Age. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Parks, M.R., and M.B. Adelman. 1983. Communication Networks and the Development of Romantic Relationships: An Expansion of Uncertainty Reduction Theory. Human Communication Research 10 (1): 55–79. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1983.tb00004.x.
Parks, M.R., and K. Floyd. 1996. Making Friends in Cyberspace. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 1 (4): 0–0. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.1996.tb00176.x.
Preece, J., Y. Rogers, H. Sharp, D. Benyon, S. Holland, and T. Carey. 1994. Human-Computer Interaction. Essex, UK: Addison-Wesley Longman Ltd.
Qtiesh, A. 2011. Spam Bots Flooding Twitter to Drown Info About #Syria Protests [Updated]. http://advocacy.globalvoicesonline.org/2011/04/18/spam-bots-flooding-twitter-to-drown-info-about-syria-protests/.
Rogers, R. 2013. Digital Methods. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
Schneiderman, B., and C. Plaisant. 2009. Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction, 5th ed. Boston: Pearson.
Star, S.L., and K. Ruhleder. 1994. Steps Towards an Ecology of Infrastructure: Complex Problems in Design and Access for Large-Scale Collaborative Systems. In Proceedings of the 1994 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 253–264. New York, NY: ACM. http://doi.org/10.1145/192844.193021.
Stone-Gross, B., M. Cova, L. Cavallaro, B. Gilbert, M. Szydlowski, R. Kemmerer, … G. Vigna. 2009. Your Botnet is My Botnet: Analysis of a Botnet Takeover. In Proceedings of the 16th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, 635–647. New York, NY: ACM. http://doi.org/10.1145/1653662.1653738.
Suchman, L. 2006. Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions, 2nd ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Tufekci, Z. 2014. Engineering the Public: Big Data, Surveillance and Computational Politics. First Monday 19 (7). http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/4901.
Turner, F. 2006. From Counterculture to Cyberculture. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Urbina, I. 2013. I Flirt and Tweet. Follow Me at #Socialbot. The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/11/sunday-review/i-flirt-and-tweet-follow-me-at-socialbot.html.
US NSF—Transformative Research. n.d. http://www.nsf.gov/about/transformative_research/submit.jsp. Accessed 13 Oct 2015.
Van Maanen, J. 2011. Tales of the Field: On Writing Ethnography, 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Vertesi, J. 2008. Mind the Gap: The London Underground Map and Users’ Representations of Urban Space. Social Studies of Science 38 (1): 7–33. doi:10.1177/0306312707084153.
Vertesi, J. 2015. Seeing Like a Rover: How Robots, Teams, and Images Craft Knowledge of Mars. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Wellman, B., A. Quan-Haase, J. Boase, W. Chen, K. Hampton, I. Díaz, and K. Miyata. 2003. The Social Affordances of the Internet for Networked Individualism. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 8 (3): 0–0. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2003.tb00216.x.
Winner, L. 1980. Do Artifacts Have Politics? Daedalus 109 (1): 121–136.
Woolley, S., and P. Howard. 2016. Bots Unite to Automate the Presidential Election. http://www.wired.com/2016/05/twitterbots-2/.
Woolley, S., and P.N. Howard. forthcoming. Social Media, Revolution, and the Rise of the Political Bot. In Routledge Handbook of Media, Conflict, and Security. New York, NY: Routledge.
Ziewitz, M. 2012. Evaluation as Governance: The Practical Politics of Reviewing, Rating and Ranking on the Internet (DPhil Thesis). Oxford: University of Oxford.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Woolley, S. (2018). The Political Economy of Bots: Theory and Method in the Study of Social Automation. In: Kiggins, R. (eds) The Political Economy of Robots. International Political Economy Series. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51466-6_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51466-6_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-51465-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-51466-6
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)