Skip to main content

Domains of Manipulation in Touchscreen Devices and Some Didactic, Cognitive, and Epistemological Implications for Improving Geometric Thinking

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Mathematics and Technology

Abstract

In this chapter, we discuss the results of a research project which investigates aspects of students’ cognitions during the process of solving tasks dealing with a Dynamic Geometric Environment with touchscreen (DGEwT). In this chapter, we discuss data from two teaching experiments carried out with Brazilian and Italian high school students dealing with GeoGebraTouch (GT) and a Geometric Constructer (GC) software. With the focus on strategies used by students to solve the proposed tasks, we suggest two domains: Constructive and relational. Furthermore, we suggest the drag-approach as an important form of manipulation to improve geometrical thinking. Finally, we present a selected variety of representative examples of didactic, cognitive, and epistemological implications for learning and researching with the use of DGEwT.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    To see this kind of motion , please download the video: https://youtu.be/qC-G96NssJk

  2. 2.

    In Brazil we are working with prospective mathematics teachers as well as with Sketchometry devices. We decided not to discuss data from their TE in this chapter.

  3. 3.

    In recent analyses we used SCR PRO (Assis 2016) as a strategy to review some details that emerged from the video analysis.

  4. 4.

    The whole video is available on https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qC-G96NssJk

  5. 5.

    In quadrilateral ABCD, the middle points (E, F, G and H) on each side have been drawn, forming quadrilateral EFGH. What characteristics does EFGH have? What happens if ABCD is a rectangle ? What if it is a square ? What if it is any quadrilateral? Demonstrate.

  6. 6.

    Build a quadrilateral ABCD. On each of its sides build a square external to the quadrilateral with one side coincident to the side of the quadrilateral. Consider the centers of the squares that have been built: R, S, T, U. Consider the quadrilateral RSTU: what can you observe? What commands do you use in order to verify your conjecture? This activity was thought as a task to introduce curiosity among students for the Napoleon Theorem , which was explored on the next assigned task.

  7. 7.

    Inspired by Arzarello et al. (2002).

References

  • Arzarello, F. (2009). New technologies in the classroom: Towards a semiotics analysis. In B. Sriraman & S. Goodchild (Eds.), Relatively and philosophically earnest: Festschrift in honor of Paul Ernest’s 65th birthday (pp. 235–255). Charlotte: IAP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arzarello, F., Olivero, F., Paola, D., & Robutti, O. (2002). A cognitive analysis of dragging practises in Cabri environments. ZDM, 34(3), 66–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arzarello, F., Paola, D., Robutti, O., & Sabena, C. (2009). Gestures as semiotic resources in the mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70(2), 97–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arzarello, F., Bartolini Bussi, M. G., Leung, A. Y. L., Mariotti, M. A., & Stevenson, I. (2012). Experimental approaches to theoretical thinking: Artefacts and proof. In G. Hanna & M. de Villliers (Eds.), Proof and proving in mathematics education (pp. 97–137). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arzarello, F., Bairral, M., Danè, C., & Yasuyuki, I. (2013). Ways of manipulation touchscreen in one geometrical dynamic software. In E. Faggiano & A. Montone (Eds.), Proceedings of the 11th international conference on technology in mathematics teaching (pp. 59–64). Bari: University of Bari.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arzarello, F., Bairral, M., & Dané, C. (2014). Moving from dragging to touchscreen: Geometrical learning with geometric dynamic software. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications, 33(1), 39–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Assis, A. R. (2016). Alunos do ensino médio trabalhando no geogebra e no geometric constructer: Mãos e rotações em touchscreen. Unpublished M.Ed. thesis, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Seropédica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bairral, M., & Arzarello, F. (2015). The use of hands and manipulation touchscreen in high school geometry classes. In K. Krainer & N. Vondrová (Eds.), Proceedings of CERME 9 (pp. 2460–2466). Prague: Charles University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bairral, M. A., Arzarello, F., & Assis, A. (2015a). High school students rotating shapes in Geogebra with touchscreen. Quaderni di Ricerca in Didattica, 25(Supplemento 2), 103–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bairral, M., Assis, A. R., & da Silva, B. C. (2015b). Mãos em ação em dispositivos touchscreen na educação matemática. Seropédica: Edur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bairral, M. A., Assis, A., & da Silva, B. C. (2015c). Toques para ampliar interações e manipulações touchscreen na aprendizagem em geometria. Paper presented at VI SIPEM, Pirenópolis, Brazil, 15–19 November 2015. http://www.sbembrasil.org.br/visipem/anais/story_ content/external_files/TOQUES%20PARA%20AMPLIAR%20INTERA%C3%87%C3%95ES%20E%20MANIPULA%C3%87%C3%95ES%20TOUCHSCREEN%20NA%20APRENDIZAGEM%20EM%20GEOMETRIA.pdf. Accessed 8 Apr 2016.

  • Boncoddo, R., Williams, C., Pier, E., Walkington, C., Alibali, M., Nathan, M., Dogan, M. F., & Waala, J. (2013). Gesture as a window to justification and proof. In M. C. S. Martinez & A. C. Superfine (Eds.), Proceedings of PME-NA 35 (pp. 229–236). Chicago: University of Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damásio, A. R. (2010). O livro da consciência: A construção do cérebro consciente. Porto: Temas e Debates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischbein, E. (1993). The theory of figural concepts. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 24(2), 139–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hostetter, A. B., & Alibali, M. W. (2008). Visible embodiment: Gestures as simulated action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(3), 495–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iijima, Y. (2012). GC/HTML5: Dynamic geometry software which can be used with Ipad and PC: Feature of software and some lessons with it. Paper presented at ICME-12, Seoul, 8–15 July 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruger, R., Carpendale, S., Scott, S. D., & Tang, A. (2005). Fluid integration of rotation and translation. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 601–610). New York: ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leung, A. (2011). An epistemic model of task design in dynamic geometry environment. ZDM–The International Journal on Mathematics Eduation, 43(3), 325–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, D. (2011). A study on the affective quality of interactivity by motion feedback in touchscreen user interfaces. PhD dissertation. Graduate School of Culture Technology. KAIST (Korea). Retrieved from. http://descarteslab.kaist.ac.kr/contents/thesis/PhDdissertation_DoyunPark.pdf

  • Park, D., Lee, J., & Kim, S. (2011). Investigating the affective quality of interactivity by motion feedback in mobile touchscreen user interfaces. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 69(12), 839–853.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radford, L. (2014). Towards an embodied, cultural, and material conception of mathematics cognition. ZDM – The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 46(3), 349–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, N., & Pimm, D. (2014). Number’s subtle touch: Expanding finger gnosis in the era of multi-touch technologies. In P. Liljedahl, C. Nicol, S. Oesterle, & D. Allan (Eds.), Proceedings of PME 38 and PME-NA 36 (Vol. 5, pp. 209–216). Vancouver: PME.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, A., Pahud, M., Carpendale, S., & Buxton, B. (2010). VisTACO: Visualizing tabletop collaboration. Paper presented at 10th international conference on interactive tabletops and surfaces, Saarbrücken, Germany, 7–10 Nov 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yook, H. J. (2009). A study on the types of interactive motions in mobile touch interface. Unpublished PhD thesis, Hongik University.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcelo Bairral .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

Appendices

Appendix 1: Timeline of the Varignon Theorem Task (Discussed on TE 2)

figure z

Appendix 2: Timeline of the Task Shown in note (a) of Table 5

figure aa

Appendix 3: List of Icons Elaborated for TE with GeoGebraTouch

figure ab
figure ac

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bairral, M., Arzarello, F., Assis, A. (2017). Domains of Manipulation in Touchscreen Devices and Some Didactic, Cognitive, and Epistemological Implications for Improving Geometric Thinking. In: Aldon, G., Hitt, F., Bazzini, L., Gellert, U. (eds) Mathematics and Technology. Advances in Mathematics Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51380-5_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51380-5_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-51378-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-51380-5

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics