Abstract
Dealing with pseudo-mechanistic models, which are continuous and empirical models where the parameters involved have a meaning according to the context where they are applied, has an added value. The aim of this study was to design a set of tasks to be performed with the help of the computer and implement them in the classroom in order to investigate a real data set with empirical models and pseudo-mechanistic models. A framework showing different strategies to tackle these data, and how they generate a variety of plausible responses to the problem, was configured. The sequence and structure of these tasks jointly with the help of appropriate computer resources, according to the students’ perceptions, enhanced the understanding of the construction and use of these models.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/nlsMicrobio/nlsMicrobio.pdf
References
Aldon, G. (2015). Technology and education: Frameworks to think mathematics education in the twenty-first century. In U. Gellert, J. Giménez Rodríguez, C. Hahn, & S. Kafoussi (Eds.), Educational paths to mathematics: A C.I.E.A.E.M. sourcebook (pp. 365–381). Cham: Springer.
Bennison, A., & Goos, M. (2010). Learning to teach mathematics with technology: A survey of professional development needs, experiences and impacts. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 22(1), 31–56.
Buchanan, R. L., Whiting, R. C., & Damert, W. C. (1997). When is simple good enough: A comparison of the Gompertz, Baranyi, and three-phase linear models for fitting bacterial growth curves. Food Microbiology, 14(4), 313–326.
Caspersen, M. E., & Nowack, P. (2014). Model-based thinking and practice: A top-down approach to computational thinking. In Proceedings of the 14th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research (pp. 147–151). New York: ACM.
de Vries, G., Hillen, T., Lewis, M., Müller, J., & Schönfisch, B. (2006). A course in mathematical biology: Quantitative modeling with mathematical & computational methods. Philadelphia: SIAM.
Gammack, D. (2015). Using NetLogo as a tool to encourage scientific thinking across disciplines. Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology, 4(1), 22–39.
Gibson, A. M., Bratchell, N., & Roberts, T. A. (1988). Predicting microbial growth: Growth responses of salmonellae in a laboratory medium as affected by pH, sodium chloride and storage temperature. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 6(2), 155–178.
Ginovart, M. (2014). Discovering the power of individual-based modelling in teaching and learning: The study of a predator-prey system. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(4), 496–513.
Ginovart, M., López, D., & Valls, J. (2002). INDISIM, an individual based discrete simulation model to study bacterial cultures. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 214(2), 305–319.
Hellweger, F. L., & Bucci, V. (2009). A bunch of tiny individuals: Individual-based modelling for microbes. Ecological Modelling, 220(1), 8–22.
Hitt, F. (2015). Technology in the teaching and learning of mathematics in the twenty-first century: What aspects must be considered? A commentary. In U. Gellert, J. Giménez Rodríguez, C. Hahn, & S. Kafoussi (Eds.), Educational paths to mathematics: A C.I.E.A.E.M. sourcebook (pp. 383–390). Cham: Springer.
Levy, S. T., & Wilensky, U. (2011). Mining students inquiry actions for understanding of complex systems. Computers & Education, 56, 556–573.
Monod, J. (1949). The growth of bacterial cultures. Annual Review of Microbiology, 3, 371–394.
Papert, S. (1996). An exploration in the space of mathematics educations. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 1(1), 95–123.
Perez-Rodriguez, F. (2014). Development and application of predictive microbiology models in food. In D. Granato & G. Ares (Eds.), Mathematical and statistical methods in food science and technology (pp. 321–361). Chichester: John Wiley.
Prado, M. E. B. B., & Lobo da Costa, N. M. (2015). Educational laptop computers integrated into mathematical classrooms. In U. Gellert, J. Giménez Rodríguez, C. Hahn, & S. Kafoussi (Eds.), Educational paths to mathematics: A C.I.E.A.E.M. sourcebook (pp. 351–363). Cham: Springer.
Railsback, S. F., & Grimm, V. (2012). Agent-based and individual-based modeling: A practical introduction. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Shiflet, A. B., & Shiflet, G. W. (2014). Introduction to computational science: Modelling and simulation for the science. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Stillman, G. A., Blum, W., & Biembengut, M. S. (2015). Cultural, social, cognitive and research influences on mathematical modelling education. In G. A. Stillman, W. Blum, & M. S. Biembengut (Eds.), Mathematical modelling in education research and practice: International perspectives on the teaching and learning of mathematical modelling (pp. 1–31). Dordrecht: Springer.
Wilensky, U. (1999). Netlogo. Evaston: Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modelling, Northwestern University.
Wilensky, U., & Rand, W. (2015). An introduction to agent-based modeling: Modeling natural, social, and engineered complex systems with NetLogo. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49, 33–35.
Zwietering, M. H., Jongenburger, I., Rombouts, F. M., & Van’t Riet, K. (1990). Modeling of the bacterial growth curve. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 56(6), 1875–1881.
Acknowledgments
I am very grateful to Dr Monica Blanco for several and interesting remarks and suggestions. The author thanks the two anonymous reviewers their valuable comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ginovart, M. (2017). A Classroom Activity to Work with Real Data and Diverse Strategies in Order to Build Models with the Help of the Computer. In: Aldon, G., Hitt, F., Bazzini, L., Gellert, U. (eds) Mathematics and Technology. Advances in Mathematics Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51380-5_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51380-5_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-51378-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-51380-5
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)