Abstract
Robotic technology emerged after the advent of laparoscopic surgery in the 1990s, initially with camera steadying systems for laparoscopic surgery, now with console controlled articulating instruments, 3D visualization and enhanced optics. Due to these advances, multi-port robotic cholecystectomy (MPRC) is an acceptably safe alternative to laparoscopic cholecystectomy. It allows the surgeon increased visualization and wristed instrumentation which mimics the hand motion of open surgery. MPRC has not been widely adopted, but may be helpful in reoperative and complex patients. This chapter focuses on the safe application of robotic technology in performing cholecystectomy with the da Vinci SI Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical Inc. Sunnyvale, CA), but the concepts will be broadly applicable to other systems.
References
Soper NJ, Stockmann PT, Dunnegan DL, Ashley SW. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The new ‘gold standard’? Arch Surg 1992;127(8):917–921; discussion 921–3.
Kelley Jr WE. The evolution of laparoscopy and the revolution in surgery in the decade of the 1990s. JSLS. 2008;12(4):351–7.
A prospective analysis of 1518 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. The Southern Surgeons Club. N Engl J Med. 1991;324(16):1073–8.
NIH Conference. Gastrointestinal surgery for severe obesity. Consensus Development Conference Panel. Ann Intern Med 1991;115(12):956–61.
Jacobs LK, Shayani V, Sackier JM. Determination of the learning curve of the AESOP robot. Surg Endosc. 1997;11(1):54–5.
Baek NH, Li G, Kim JH, Hwang JC, Kim JH, Yoo BM, et al. Short-term surgical outcomes and experience with 925 patients undergoing robotic cholecystectomy during a 4-year period at a single institution. Hepatogastroenterology. 2015;62(139):573–6.
Breitenstein S, Nocito A, Puhan M, Held U, Weber M, Clavien PA. Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a case-matched control study. Ann Surg. 2008;247(6):987–93.
Vidovszky TJ, Smith W, Ghosh J, Ali MR. Robotic cholecystectomy: learning curve, advantages, and limitations. J Surg Res. 2006;136(2):172–8.
Ayloo S, Roh Y, Choudhury N. Laparoscopic versus robot-assisted cholecystectomy: a retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg (London, England). 2014;12(10):1077–81.
Kim JH, Baek NH, Li G, Choi SH, Jeong IH, Hwang JC, et al. Robotic cholecystectomy with new port sites. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19(20):3077–82.
Agresta F, Campanile FC, Vettoretto N, Silecchia G, Bergamini C, Maida P, et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: consensus conference-based guidelines. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2015;400(4):429–53.
Nelson EC, Gottlieb AH, Muller HG, Smith W, Ali MR, Vidovszky TJ. Robotic cholecystectomy and resident education: the UC Davis experience. Int J Medical Robot. 2014;10(2):218–22.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Parikh, S., Carr, A. (2018). Masters Program Biliary Pathway: Multiport Robotic Cholecystectomy. In: Patel, A.D., Oleynikov, D. (eds) The SAGES Manual of Robotic Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51362-1_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51362-1_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-51360-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-51362-1
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)