Abstract
The instrumentalist view of the purpose of education manifested in recent decades through the influence of neoliberal ideology, and the set of assumptions that accompany this wave of change and reform, are critiqued from an ecological and humanistic viewpoint. A collective blindness to the global systemic issues that are shaping the near human and planetary future is present both in wider society and in educational systems that can, consequently, be deemed maladaptive to this reality. A deep learning response within educational thinking, policymaking, and practice is required based upon an emerging relational or ecological worldview, already burgeoning in diverse civil society movements. This would allow attention to be brought to generating purposes and assumptions in education aligned to, and able to address, the possibilities of systemic breakdown or breakthrough in global and local systems. Such education is supportive of living in more creative, collaborative, and explorative ways that help assure breakthrough trajectories as the century plays out.
References
Armstrong, S., & Pamlin, D. (2015). Global challenges—12 risks that threaten human civilisation. Global Challenges Foundation, Future of Humanity Institute, Oxford: Oxford University. Retrieved from http://globalchallenges.org/wp-content/uploads/12-Risks-with-infinite-impact.pdf
Avent, R. (2016, October 9). Welcome to a world without work. The Observer, pp. 37–39.
Bentley, T. (1998). Learning beyond the classroom—Education for a changing world. London: Demos/Routledge.
Boffey, D. (2015). Half of all teachers in England threaten to quit as morale crashes. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/education/2015/oct/04/half-of-teachers-consider-leaving-profession-shock-poll
Boulding, K. (1978). Ecodynamics—A new theory of social evolution. London: Sage Publications.
Chapman, J. (2002). System failure. London: Demos.
Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (DBIS). (2016). Success as a knowledge economy: Teaching excellence, social mobility and student choice. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/523396/bis-16-265-success-as-a-knowledge-economy.pdf
Escrigas, C. (2015). A higher calling for higher education. Boston, MA: Tellus Institute. Retrieved from http://www.greattransition.org/publication/a-higher-calling-for-higher-education
Gore, A. (2013). The future. New York: W.H. Allen.
Greer, D. (2013). New assumptions and new solutions for higher education reform. Center for Higher Education, Strategic Information and Governance, NJ: The Richard Stockton College of New Jersey. Retrieved from http://intraweb.stockton.edu/eyos/hughescenter/content/docs/HESIG/Working%20Paper%201%20for%20Website.pdf
GurrÃa, A. (2014). Editorial—Education and skills for inclusive growth. Education at a glance 2014 OECD indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/edu/Education-at-a-Glance-2014.pdf
Holmwood, J., Hickey, T., Cohen, R., & Wallis, S. The alternative white paper for higher education—In defence of public education: Knowledge for a successful society. Retrieved from https://heconvention2.files.wordpress.com/2016/06/awp1.pdf
Homer-Dixon, T. (2006). The upside of down—Catastrophe, creativity and the renewal of civilisation. London: Souvenir Press.
Marshall, P., & Peters, M. (1999). Education policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
MartÃnez-RodrÃguez, F., & Fernández-HerrerÃa, A. (2016). Is there life beyond neoliberalism? Critical socio-educational alternatives for civic construction. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 14, 1–12. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/ref/10.1080/14767724.2016.1195726 doi:10.1080/14767724.2016.1195726
McGilchrist, I. (2009). The Master and his emissary: The divided brain and the making of the western world. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Meadows, D. (2009). Thinking in systems—A primer. London: Earthscan.
Peters, G. (1999). A systems failures view of the UK National Commission into Higher Education Report. In R. Ison (Ed.), Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 16(2), 123–131.
Press Association. (2016). Primary school pupils ‘driven to self-harm amid tests and social media stress’. Retrieved from http://www.aol.co.uk/news/2016/04/04/primary-school-pupils-driven-to-selfharm-amid-tests-and-social-media-stress/
Raskin, P., Banuri, T., Gallopin, G., Gutman, P., Hammond, A., Kates, R., & Swart, R. (2002). Great transition: The promise and lure of the times ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute/Tellus Institute.
Renner, M. (2015). The seeds of modern threats. In L. Mastny (Ed.), State of the world 2015: Confronting hidden threats to sustainability (pp. 3–17). Washington, DC: Earthwatch Institute, Island Press.
Rockström, J. W. (2015). Bounding the planetary future: Why we need a great transition. Tellus Institute. Retrieved from http://www.tellus.org/pub/Rockstrom-Bounding_the_Planetary_Future.pdf
Smith, W. (2016). The global testing culture—Shaping education policy, perceptions, and practice. Oxford: Symposium Books.
Sterling, S. (1996). Education in change. In J. Huckle & S. Sterling, (Eds.), Education for sustainability. London: Earthscan.
Sterling, S. (2001). Sustainable education—Re-visioning learning and change, Schumacher briefing. Dartington: Green Books.
Sterling, S. (2003). Whole systems thinking as a basis for paradigm change in education: explorations in the context of sustainability. PhD diss., Centre for Research in Education and the Environment, University of Bath. Available at: www.bath.ac.uk/cree/sterling/sterlingthesis.pdf
Sterling, S. (2009). Towards sustainable education. Environmental Scientist, 18(1), 19–21.
Strauss, V. (2013). Five bad education assumptions the media keeps recycling. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/answer-sheet/wp/2013/08/29/five-bad-education-assumptions-the-media-keeps-recycling/
UNESCO. (2015). Rethinking education—Towards a global common good? Paris: UNESCO.
Verger, A., Lubienski, C., & Steiner-Khamsi, G. (2016a). The rise of the global education industry: Some concepts, facts and figures. Retrieved from www.educationincrisis.net/blog/item/1308-the-rise-of-the-global-education-industry-some-concepts-facts-and-figures
Verger, A., Lubienski, C., & Steiner-Khamsi, G. (2016b). The emergence and structuring of the global education industry—Towards an analytic framework. In A. Verger, C. Lubienski, & G. Steiner-Khamsi (Eds.), The world yearbook of education 2016: The global education industry. London: Routledge. Retrieved from https://www.book2look.de/embed/HNoMrtccf1&euid=56938807&ruid=56938806&referurl=www.routledge.com&clickedby=H5W&biblettype=html5
World Economic Forum. (2016). The global risks report 2016 (11th ed.). Geneva: WEF. Retrieved from https://heconvention2.files.wordpress.com/2016/06/awp1.pdf
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sterling, S. (2017). Assuming the Future: Repurposing Education in a Volatile Age. In: Jickling, B., Sterling, S. (eds) Post-Sustainability and Environmental Education. Palgrave Studies in Education and the Environment. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51322-5_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51322-5_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-51321-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-51322-5
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)