Abstract
This book provides a critique of more than two decades of sustained effort to infuse educational systems with education for sustainable development, sustainability education, and, for longer still, environmental education. Additionally, taking to heart the idea that deconstruction is a prelude to reconstruction, this critique leads to discussion about how education can be remade in ways that are conceptually strong and respond to the educational imperatives of our time, particularly as they relate to ecological crises and human/nature relationships. Central to the task at hand is not to add new bits to the curriculum, or new signifiers, but rather, to frame a “new vision for education.”
Notes
- 1.
The Glove and Mail, April 1, 2013, p. A14.
- 2.
- 3.
Here we are referring to Initiatives arising out of the Rio Earth Summit and Agenda 21 in 1992 and peaking with the decade of education for sustainable development that has just ended.
- 4.
- 5.
See, for example, Patti Lather, 2013.
References
Bengtsson, S. L. (2016). Hegemony and the politics of policy-making for education for sustainable development: A case study of Vietnam. Journal of Environmental Education, 47(2), 77–90.
Bengtsson, S. L., & Östman, L. O. (2013). Globalisation and education for sustainable development: Emancipation from context and meaning. Environmental Education Research, 19(4), 477–498.
Blühdorn, I. (2002). Unsustainability as a frame of mind: And how we disguise it: The silent counter-revolution and the politics of simulation. The Trumpeter, 18(1), 59–69.
Blühdorn, I. (2011). The politics of unsustainability: COP15, post-ecologism, and the ecological paradox. Organization & Environment, 24(1), 34–53.
Dobson, A. (1996). Environment sustainabilities: An analysis and a typology. Environmental Politics, 5(3), 401–428.
González-Gaudiano, E. J. (2005). Education for sustainable development. Policy Futures in Education, 3(3), 243–250.
González-Gaudiano, E. J. (2006). Environmental education: A field in tension or in transition? Environmental Education Research, 12(3–4), 291–300.
Jickling, B. (2013). Normalizing catastrophe: An educational response. Environmental Education Research, 19(2), 161–176.
Lather, P. (2013). Methodology-21: What do we do in the afterword? International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 634–645.
Marcuse, H. (1964). One-dimensional man. Boston: Beacon Press.
Saul, J. R. (1995). The unconscious civilization. Concord, ON: Anasi.
UNESCO. (2015). Rethinking education: Towards a global common good? Paris: UNESCO. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0023/002325/232555e.pdf
UNESCO. (2016). Education for people and planet: Creating sustainable futures for all. Paris: UNESCO. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0024/002457/245745e.pdf
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jickling, B., Sterling, S. (2017). Post-Sustainability and Environmental Education: Framing Issues. In: Jickling, B., Sterling, S. (eds) Post-Sustainability and Environmental Education. Palgrave Studies in Education and the Environment. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51322-5_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51322-5_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-51321-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-51322-5
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)