Skip to main content

Blurred Lines, Distinct Forces: The Evolving Practices of Italian TV Audiences in a Convergent Scenario

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1667 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter builds on the final results of a several-years-long qualitative research on Italian convergent television, mainly focusing on the different professional and cultural approaches to television and media convergence and on the changes in television viewers’ consumption habits and practices, following or reacting to broadcasters’ production strategies. An original “pyramid” model of “weak” and “strong” audience engagement is presented, to represent effectively the relationships between television shows and their audiences and the different possible practices. The model is also particularly effective in explaining the more recent trends inside the Italian scenario. These changes in viewing practices and in the interplay between broadcasters and audiences have been divided into four categories to offer a fluid and unstable yet accurate portrait of television convergent consumption.

The two authors conceived, planned and prepared this chapter jointly. The sections “Researching Convergent Television Viewing Practices: Beyond the Idealizations” and “Mapping Convergent Viewers’ Practices” were written by Massimo Scaglioni, and “Main Trends in Italian Television Convergent Television Consumption” and “Conclusions: A Doubly Mobile Pyramid” by Luca Barra.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Askwith, I.D. (2007). Television 2.0. Reconceptualizing TV as an engagement medium. Boston: MS thesis, MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barra, L. (2009). The mediation is the message. Italian regionalization of US TV series as co-creational work. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 12(5), 509–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barra, L. (2015). Palinsesto. Storia e tecnica della programmazione televisiva. Roma-Bari: Laterza.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barra, L., & Scaglioni, M. (2013). Risalite e discese. Le trasformazioni dei percorsi degli spettatori nell’ecosistema mediale. In C. Bisoni & V. Innocenti (Eds.), Media mutations. Gli ecosistemi narrativi nello scenario mediale contemporaneo. Spazi, modelli, usi sociali (pp. 165–174). Modena: Mucchi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barra, L., & Scaglioni, M. (2014). TV Goes Social. Italian broadcasting strategies and the challenges of convergence. View. Journal of European Television History and Culture, 3(6), 110–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, M. J. (2013). Transmedia television. New trends in network serial production. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Sola Pool, I. (1983). Technologies of freedom. Cambridge (MA): Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, J. (2000). Scheduling: the last creative act in television? Media, Culture and Society, 22(1), 25–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, E. (2011). Transmedia television. audiences, new media, and daily life. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grasso, A., & Scaglioni, M. (Eds.). (2010). Televisione convergente La tv oltre il piccolo schermo. Milano: Link RTI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grainge‚ P.‚ & Johnson‚ C. (2015). Promotional screen industries. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herkman, J. (2012). Convergence or intermediality? Finnish political communication in the New Media Age. Convergence, 18(4), 369–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibrus, I., & Scolari, C. A. (Eds.). (2012). Crossmedia innovations. Texts, markets, institutions. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, H. (2003). Transmedia storytelling. MIT Technology Review, 15 January.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture. New York: NYU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, H. (2009). The revenge of the origami unicorn: Seven principles of transmedia storytelling. Confessions of an Aca-Fan, 12 December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, H., Ford, S., & Green, J. (2013). Spreadable media. creating value and meaning in a networked culture. New York: NYU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, C. (2012). Branding television. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lotz, A. D. (2007). The television will be revolutionized. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsden, C. T., & Verhulst, S. G. (Eds.). (1999). Convergence in European digital tv regulation. London: Blackstone Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meikle, G., & Young, S. (2012). Media convergence. Networked digital media in everyday life. London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittell, J. (2015). Complex TV. The poetics of contemporary television storytelling. New York: NYU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortoleva, P. (2002). Mediastoria. Mezzi di comunicazione e cambiamento sociale nel mondo contemporaneo. Milano: il Saggiatore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pescatore, G., & Innocenti, V. (2012). Information architecture in contemporary television series. Journal of Information Architecture, 4(1–2), 57–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scaglioni, M. (2011). La tv dopo la tv. Il decennio che ha cambiato la televisione. Milano: Vita e Pensiero.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scaglioni, M., & Sfardini, A. (2008). MultiTv. L’esperienza televisiva nell’età della convergenza. Roma: Carocci.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spigel, L., & Olsson, I. (Eds.). (2004). Television after TV: Essays on a medium in transition. Durham (NC): Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szczepaniak, R. (Ed.). (2013). Media convergence. Approaches and experiences, Frankfurt: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tryon, C. (2013). On demand culture. Digital delivery and the future of movies. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulin, J. (2010). The business of media distribution. Monetizing film, tv, and video content. Burlington: Focal Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Bulck, H. (2009). The last yet also the first creative act in television? Media History, 15(3), 321–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ytreberg, E. (2002). Continuity in environments. The evolution of basic practices and dilemmas in northern television scheduling. European Journal of Communications, 17(3), 283–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luca Barra .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Barra, L., Scaglioni, M. (2017). Blurred Lines, Distinct Forces: The Evolving Practices of Italian TV Audiences in a Convergent Scenario. In: Sparviero, S., Peil, C., Balbi, G. (eds) Media Convergence and Deconvergence. Global Transformations in Media and Communication Research - A Palgrave and IAMCR Series. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51289-1_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics