Abstract
Science is an amorphous, distributed, and dynamic institution, composed of many other institutions and falling under the control of no central body. Rather, the body of knowledge that science develops becomes a part of our common heritage. Over time, as science improves our understanding of the universe and our place in it, we are enriched in ways that are both tangible and intangible. Because of its nature as an institution composed of institutions, with many connections both tangential and integral to nearly every part of society, we must be particularly mindful of the value, impact, and responsibilities of science and those working in it. As well, we should take care to relate the reciprocal duties of science to society and vice versa. Scientists do not work in a vacuum, and the work that scientists do benefits us all, whether we know it or not. It is incumbent upon scientists to communicate with the public, and to interact in ways that are both educational and ethical because science and the public stand in mutually beneficial relationships to one another, and are also mutually dependent. In this chapter, I consider to what extent science and society owe duties to each other.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Birnholtz, Jeremy P., and Matthew J. Bietz. 2003. Data at work: Supporting sharing in science and engineering. In Proceedings of the 2003 international ACM SIGGROUP conference on Supporting group work. ACM.
Borgman, Christine L. 2012. The conundrum of sharing research data. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 63(6): 1059–1078.
Fienberg, Stephen E., Margaret E. Martin, and Miron L. Straf (eds.). 1985. Sharing research data. Washington, DC: National Academies.
Gordin, Michael D. 2012. How lysenkoism became pseudoscience: dobzhansky to velikovsky. Journal of the History of Biology 45(3): 443–468.
Grundmann, Reiner. 2013. “Climategate” and The Scientific Ethos. Science, Technology & Human Values 38(1): 67–93.
Holliman, Richard. 2011. Advocacy in the tail: Exploring the implications of ‘climategate’ for science journalism and public debate in the digital age. Journalism 12(7): 832–846.
Krementsov, Nikolai. 2000. Lysenkoism in Europe: Export-import of the Soviet model. Academia in upheaval: Origins, transfers, and transformations of the Communist Academic Regime in Russia and East Central Europe, 179–202. New York: Garland Publishing Group.
Leiserowitz, Anthony A., et al. 2013. Climategate, public opinion, and the loss of trust. American Behavioral Scientist 57(6): 818–837.
Lewontin, Richard, and Richard Levins. 1976. The problem of Lysenkoism. In The radicalization of science, ed. H. &. S. Rose. London: Macmillan.
Maibach, Edward, et al. 2012. The legacy of climategate: undermining or revitalizing climate science and policy? Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 3(3): 289–295.
Rai, Arti Kaur. 1999. Regulating scientific research: Intellectual property rights and the norms of science. Northwestern University Law Review 94: 77.
Sonneborn, T.M. 1950. Heredity, environment, and politics. American Association for the Advancement of Science. Science 111: 529–539.
Tenopir, Carol, et al. 2011. Data sharing by scientists: Practices and perceptions. PloS One 6(6): e21101.
Vickers, Andrew J. 2006. Whose data set is it anyway? Sharing raw data from randomized trials. Trials 7(1): 15.
Wallis, Jillian C., Elizabeth Rolando, and Christine L. Borgman. 2013. If we share data, will anyone use them? Data sharing and reuse in the long tail of science and technology. PloS One 8(7): e67332.
Ziman, John. 2002. Real science: What it is and what it means. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Koepsell, D. (2017). Duties of Science to Society (and Vice Versa). In: Scientific Integrity and Research Ethics. SpringerBriefs in Ethics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51277-8_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51277-8_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-51276-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-51277-8
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)